This paper presents research addressed to understanding how candidate age affects promotability. A field study of 125 lower-level managers indicated that age had an inverse relationship with promotability for both young and older managers and also appeared to serve as a moderator variable for the job tenure and education factors. Job tenure and education were relevant criteria only for the younger managers. By contrast, job performance ratings were significant for both age groups. Alternative explanations for the results and the implications of the findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ. C.MilkovichG. T.TsuiA., 1981. A model of intra-organizational mobility. Academy of Management Review, 6, No. 4, 529–538.
2.
BowersW. H., 1952. An appraisal of worker characteristics as related to age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 36, 296–300.
3.
ChaseR. B.AquilanoN. J., 1981. Production and Operations Management, 602–605. Homewood, ILL.: Richard D. Irwin.
4.
CoxT.NkomoS. M., 1985. Fixed vs. discretionary factors as predictors of promotability ratings: A field study of public sector managers. Southeast AIDS Proceedings, February, pp. 18–20.
5.
CoxT.Jr.NkomoS. M., 1986. Differential performance appraisal criteria: A field study of black and white managers. Group and Organization Studies, 11 (1–2), 101–119.
6.
ClevelandJ. N.LandyF. J., 1983. The effects of person and job stereotypes on two personnel decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 609–619.
7.
CrewJ. C., 1984. Age stereotypes as a function of race. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 431–435.
8.
CraftJ. A.DoctorsS. I.ShkopY. M.BeneckiT. J., 1979. Simulated management perceptions, hiring decisions and age. Aging and Work, 2, 95–102.
9.
DaltonM., 1951. Informal factors in career achievement. American-Journal of Sociology, 56 No. 4, 407–415.
10.
EhrenbergR. G.SmithR. S., 1985. Modern Labor Economics. Glenview, ILL.: Scott Foresman & Co.
11.
ElliottC. K., 1966. Age and internal labor mobility of semi-skilled workers. Occupational Psychology, 40, No.4, 227–236.
12.
FaleyR. H.KleinmanL. S.Lengnick-HallM. L., 1984. Age discrimination and personnel psychology: A review and synthesis of the legal literature with implications for future research. Personnel Psychology, 37, No. 2, 327–349.
13.
FieldH. S.HolleyW. H., 1982. The relationship performance appraisal system characteristics to verdicts in selected employment discrimination cases. Academy of Management Journal, 25, No. 2, 392–406.
14.
GraenG. B.OrrisD.JohnsonT., 1973. Role assimilation process in a complex organization. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 30, 395–420.
HallR., 1982. The importance of lifetime jobs in the U.S. economy. American Economic Review, 72, 716–724.
17.
KachiganS., 1982. Multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Radius Press.
18.
KelleherC. H.QuirkD. A., 1973. Age, functional capacity and work: An annotated bibliography. Industrial Gerontology, No. 3, 147–155.
19.
KerlingerF. N., 1973. Foundations of behavioral research, New York: Holt, Linehart and Winston, Inc.
20.
LawrenceB. S., 1984. Age grading: The implicit organizational timetable. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 5, 23–35.
21.
MartinN. H.StraussA. L.1959. Patterns of mobility within industrial organizations, pp. 85–101 in Industrial man ed. WarnerW. L.MarrinN. H.. New York: Harper & Row.
22.
NkomoS. M.CoxT.Jr., 1987. Individual and organizational factors affecting the upward mobility of black managers. (Working paper). Charlotte, N.C.University of North Carolina/Charlotte.
23.
ParsonsD. O., 1977. Models of labor market turnover: A theoretical and empirical survey. Research in Labor Economics, 185–223. ed. EhrenbergRonald, Greenwich, Conn., JAI Press.
24.
RhodesS. R., 1983. Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 93, No. 2, 328–367.
25.
RosenB.JerdeeT. H., 1976a. The nature of job related age stereotypes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, No. 2, 180–183.
26.
RosenB.JerdeeT. H., 1976b. The influence of age stereotypes on managerial decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, No. 4, 428–432.
27.
RosenB.JerdeeT. H.LunnR. O., 1981. Effects of performance appraisal format, age and performance level on retirement decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, No. 4, 515–519.
28.
RosenbaumJ. E.1984. Career mobility in a corporate hierarchy. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
29.
SchusterM. H.MillerS. C., 1984. Performance appraisal and the age discrimination in employment act. Personnel Journal, 63, 48–58.
30.
SchwabD. P.HenemanH. G., 1978. Age stereotyping in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, No. 5, 573–578.
31.
SchwabD. P.HenemanH. G., 1977. Effects of age and experience on productivity”. Industrial Gerontology, 4, 113–117.
32.
SimonH. A., 1957. Models of man: Social and rational. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
33.
SpurrW. A.BoniniC. P., 1967. Statistical Analysis for Business Decisions. Homewood, ILL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
34.
StewartL. P.GudykunstW. B., 1982. Differential factors influencing the hierarchical level and number of promotions of males and females within an organization”. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 586–597.
35.
StumpfS. A.LondonM., 1983. Effects of candidate characteristics on management promotion decisions: An experimental study. Personnel Psychology, 36, 241–256.
36.
StumpfS. A.LondonM., 1981. Management promotions: Individual and organizational factors influencing the decision process. Academy of Management Review, 6, No. 4, 539–549.
37.
TaylorR. N.1975a. Age and experience as determinants of managerial information processing and decision making performance. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 74–81.
38.
TaylorR.N., 1975b. Preferences of industrial managers for information sources in making promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 269–272.
39.
WaldmanD. A.AvolioB. J., 1986. A meta analysis of age differences in job performance”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 33–38.
40.
WeberR. A.1974. The relation of group performance to age of members in homogeneous groups. Academy of Management Journal, 17: 570–574.
