Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The impact of using two different consensus procedures in an assessment center was investigated using a field experiment. Two groups of assessors observed participants in the same exercises. The experimental group used a consensus procedure that did not allow evaluative discussions of behaviors or attribution of scores to assessors. The control group allowed both activities. The results showed significant and important differences between the two groups of assessors in both scores and rankings of participants. Scores from the experimental group showed no significant difference form independent ratings by supervisors on the same performance dimensions. This contrasted with the strongly significant difference shown by the control group. The results support previous findings that there is a need to standardize the consensus procedures. The process described for the experimental group is suggested as a model.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cohen

S.L.

(1978). Standardization of assessment center technology: Some critical concerns. Journal of Assessment Center Technology, 1, 1–10.

Delbecq

A. L.

Van de Ven

Gustafson

D.H.

(1975). Group Techniques for Program Planning. Glenview, Illinois, Scott, Foresman & Company.

Dugan

(1988). Effects of assessor training on information use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 743–748.

Fitzgerald

L.F.

Quaintance

M.K.

(1982). Survey of assessment center use in state and local government. Journal of Assessment Center Technology, 5, 9–21. Publishing Company.

Lowry

P.E.

(in press). The Assessment center: Reducing interassessor influence. Public Personnel Management.

Norusis

M.J.

(1988). SPSS/PC+ advanced statistics V2.0 for the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2. Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc.

Russell

C.J.

(1985). Individual decision processes in an assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 737–746.

Sackett

P.R.

(1982). A critical look at some common beliefs about assessment centers. Public Personnel Management Journal, 11 140–147.

Sackett

P.R.

(1987). Assessment Centers and content validity: Some neglected issues. Personnel Psychology, 40, 13–25.

10.

Sackett

P.R.

Wilson

M.A.

(1982). Factors affecting the consensus judgment process in managerial assessment centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 10–17.

11.

Schmitt

(1977) Interrater agreement in dimensionality and combination of assessment center judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 171–176.

12.

Silverman

W.H.

Dalessio

Woods

S. B.

Johnson

R.L.

Jr. (1986). Influence of assessment center methods on rating methods Personnel Psychology, 39, 565–578.

13.

Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines (1989). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Public Personnel Management, 18, 457–470.

14.

Task Force on Assessment Center Standards (1980). Standards and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. The Personnel Administration, 35–38.

15.

Thornton

G.C.

III Byham

W.C.

(1982). Assessment centers and managerial performance. New York: Academic Press.

16.

Yeager

S.J.

(1982). Use of assessment centers by metropolitan fire departments in North America. Public Personnel Management, 15, 51–64.

The Assessment Center: Effects of Varying Consensus Procedures

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References