This article examines the experience of several agencies in Florida state government with their standards-based performance appraisal system and develops and tests a research strategy for determining the effect of agency investment in its implementation. Findings based on interviews of personnel managers and a survey of employees that suggest there are limits to the usefulness of performance appraisal which management must consider when deciding how to appraise and improve employee performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CummingsL.SchwabD. (1973). Performance in organizations: Determinants and appraisal. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Co.
2.
DaleyD. (1988). Performance appraisal and organizational success: Public employee perceptions in an MBO-based appraisal system. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 9 (1), 17–27.
3.
DaleyD. (1987). Meritpay enters with a whimper: The initial federal civil service reform experience. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7 (2), 72–79.
4.
DaleyC.MadsenA. (1980). How to evaluate people in business, the track record method of making correct judgments. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Florida Department of Administration. (1989). Rules of the career service system (Chapter 22A-9.02). Tallahassee, FL: Author.
6.
GabrisG. (1986). Can merit pay systems avoid creating discord between supervisors and subordinates?—Another uneasy look at performance appraisal. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7 (1), 70–89.
7.
GlueckW. (1982). Personnel: A diagnostic approach. Dallas, TX Business Publications.
8.
HalachmiA.HolzerM. (1987). Merit pay, performance targeting and productivity. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7 (2), 80–91.
9.
HaysS.TyerC. (1980). Human resource management: The missing link. International Journal of Public Administration, 2 (3), 297–330.
10.
KaneJ.LawlerE.E.III. (1978). Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 555–586.
11.
KelloggM. (1975). What to do about performance appraisal. New York: AMACOM.
12.
LeeR.D. (1987). Public personnel systems. Rockville, MA: Aspen Publishers.
13.
LocherA.TeelK. (1977). Performance appraisal: A survey of current practices. Personnel Journal, 56, 245–254.
14.
LovrichN. (1982). Assessing the performance of individual on the job. In RabinJ.VocinoT.HildrethW.B.MillerG. (Eds.), Handbook on public personnel administration and labor relations (pp. 250–275). New York: Marcel Dekker.
15.
McGregorD. (1957). An uneasy look at performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 35, 89–94.
MorriseyG. (1983). Performance appraisals in the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
NigroL. (1982). CSRA performance appraisals and merit pay: Growing uncertainty in the federal workforce. Public Personnel Management, 11, 371–375.
19.
Office of Personnel Management. (1981). Performance standards handbook: A reference for managers and supervisors. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 1–15.
20.
PattenT. (1982). A manager's guide to performance appraisal. New York: Free Press.
21.
PerryJ. (1986). Merit pay systems in the public sector: The case for a failure of theory. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7 (1), 57–69.
22.
PulakosE.WexleyK. (1983). The relationship among perceputal similarity, sex and performance rating in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 129–139.
23.
RichW. (1989). Appraising employee performance. In PerryJ. (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 388–400). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
SherwoodF. (1982/83). Wrong assumptions, wrong strategies. The Bureaucrat, 11, 22–27.
25.
SherwoodF.WechslerB. (1986). The ‘hadacol’ of the eighties: Paying senior public managers for performance. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7 (1), 27–41.
26.
SiegelG. (1987). The jury is still out on merit pay in government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7 (3), 3–15.
ThayerF. (1987). Performance appraisal and merit pay systems: The disasters multiply. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7 (2), 36–53.
30.
TyerC. (1982). Employee performance appraisal in American state governments. Public Personnel Management, 11, 199–212.
31.
The United States General Accounting Office. (1989). Managing human resources: Greater OPM leadership needed to address critical challenges. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 371–375.
