The purpose of this study was to investigate sick leave use in the West Virginia Department of Education. Salary, gender, number of supervisors, job autonomy, job classification and stress were the factors chosen to relate to sick leave use. Salary, gender, number of supervisors and job autonomy were found to be related statistically to sick leave use. This study has implications for policy development pertaining to sick leave. Several explanations are offered for the findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Absence from work: Measuring the hours lost. (1978). Special Labor Force Report No. 207. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Labor.
2.
ArgyleM.GardnerG.CioffiF. (1958). Supervisory methods related to productivity, absenteeism and labor turnover. Human Relations, 2, 23–40.
3.
BaumgartelH.SobolR. (1959). Background and organizational factors in absenteeism. Personnel Psychology, 12, 431–443.
4.
BernardinHarold, (1977) The relationship of personality variables to organizational withdrawal. Personnel Psychology, 30, 25–26.
5.
BridgesE.HallinanM. (1978). Subunit size, work system interdependence, and employee absenteeism. Educational Administration Quarterly, 14, 24–42.
6.
CampbellE. (1970). Sick leave abuse and what to do about it: A look at government employees. Personnel, 47, 42–43.
7.
CarranzaE., (1974). Life changes and teacher performance. California Journal of Educational Research, 25, 73–78.
8.
ClarkJ. (1980). A study of the relationship between sick leave usage and the variables of life change, salary, rank, age, sex, and race in the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Southern Mississippi, Mississippi.
9.
CleggC. (1983). The Psychology of employee lateness, absence and turnover: A methodological critique and an empirical study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 88–101.
10.
FarrellD.RusboltC. (1985). Understanding the retention function: A model of the causes of exit, voice, loyalty and neglect behaviors. Personnel Administrator, 30, 4, 129–140.
11.
FriedJ.WestmanM.DavisM. (1972). Man-machine salary interactions and absenteeism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 5, 428–429.
12.
GibsonO.LafornaraP. (1972). Collective legitimacy and organizational attachment: A longitudinal case study of school personnel absences. Presented at eh annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. ERIC Document ED 063 674.
13.
HackmanJ.LawlerE.III (1977). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259–286.
14.
HedgesJ. (1973). Absence from work — A look at some national data. Monthly Labor Review, 96, 24–30.
15.
HedgesJ. (1977). Absence from work — Measuring the hours lost. Monthly Labor Review, 100, 16–23.
16.
HerzbergF.MausnerB.PetersonR.CapwellD. (1957). Job attitudes: Review of research and opinion. Pittsburgh: Psychological Service of Pittsburgh.
17.
HillJ.TristE. (1955). Changes in accident and other absences with length of service. Human Relations, 8, 121–152.
18.
HolmesT.RaheR. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218.
19.
IvancevichJ. (1985). Predicting absenteeism from prior absence and work attitudes, Academy of Management Journal, 28, 219–228.
20.
JohnsG. (1978). Attitudinal and non-attitudinal predictors of two forms of absence from work. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 431–444.
21.
KopelmanA.SchnellerG.IVSilverJ.Jr. (1961). Parkinson's law and absenteeism: A program to rein in sick leave costs. Personnel Administration, 57–64.
22.
KroesserH. (1984). Salary, sex and sick leave use. School Business Affairs, 50, 49,88.
23.
KuzmitsF. (1980). How good is your absenteeism control system?S. A. M. Advanced Management Journal, 45, 4–15.
24.
LeczinskyC. (1972). Work — Autonomy and teacher illness — Absence in the elementary school, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New York: Buffalo.
25.
MetznerH.MannF. (1953). Employee attitudes and absences. Personnel Psychology, 6, 467–485.
26.
MowdayR.SpencerD. (1981). The influence of task and personality characteristics on employee turnover and absenteeism incidents. Academy of Management Journal24, 634–642.
27.
NicholsonN.WallT.LischeronJ. (1977). The predictability of absence and propensity to leave from employees' job satisfaction an attitudes toward influence in decision-making. Human Relations, 30, 6, 499–514.
28.
ScottK.TaylorG. (1985). An examination of conflicting findings on the relationship between job satisfaction and absenteeism: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 599–612.
29.
TalacchiS. (1960). Organization size, individual attitudes and behavior: An empirical study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 398–420.
30.
TerborgJ.LeeT.SmithF.DavisG.TurbinM. (1982). Extension of the Schmidt and Hunter Validity generalization procedure to the prediction of absenteeism behavior from knowledge of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 440–449.
31.
WaltersL.RoachD. (1971). Relationship between job attitudes and two forms of withdrawal from the work situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 92–94.
32.
West Virginia Department of Education Annual Report Volume. (1982–1983). Charleston, West Virginia: West Virginia Department of Education.
