Much criticism is leveled at the nature and usefulness of the employment interview. Yet, there are continuous efforts made to refine and enhance interview procedures and techniques. Despite its shortcomings, despite the availability of more objective means of selection, classification, and placement, the personal interview is used pervasively.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArveyR.D. (1979). Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological aspects. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 736–765.
2.
BakerH. G.BerryV. M. (1987). Processes and advantages of entry-level career counseling. Personnel Journal, 66 (4), 111–121.
3.
CriscuoloN. (1977, July). How to size up a prospective reading teacher. American School Board Journal, 27.
4.
DipboyeD.L.ArveyR.D.TerpstraD.E. (1976). Equal employment and the interview. Personnel Journal, 55 (10), 520–524.
5.
HakelM.D. (1982). Employment interviewing. In RowlandK.M.FerrisG.R. (Eds.), Personnel Management, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 129–155.
6.
JanzT. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577–580.
7.
LandyF.J. (1976). The validity of the interview in police officer selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 193–198.
8.
MayfieldE.C.BrownS.H.HamstraB.W. (1980). Selection interviewing in the life insurance industry: An update of research and practice. Personnel Psychology, 33, 725–739.
