ArgyrisChris (1978). “Organizational Behavior,” in ShafritzJayHydeAlbert (eds.) Classics of Public Administration.Oak Park, IL: Moore Publishing: 182–186.
3.
BarnardChester I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BurkeR. J.WilcoxD. S. (1969)., “Characteristics of Effective Employee Performance Review and Development Interviews,”Personnel Psychology22 (Autumn): 291–305.
5.
CherryRobert (1970)., “Performance Reviews: A Note on Failure,”Personnel Journal49 (May): 398–403.
6.
Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. (1978). Senate Bill 2640, 95th Congress, Second Session: 27–30.
7.
ClingenpeelRichard (1962). “How Employees Feel About Performance Appraisal,”PersonnelVol. 39, No. 3 (May/June), p. 73.
8.
DemarcoJohnNigroLloyd G. (1983)., “Implementing Performance Appraisal Reform in the United States Civil Service,”Public Administration61 (Spring): 45–57.
9.
FalcioneRaymond L. (September, 1973). “The Relationship of Supervisor Credibility to Subordinate Satisfaction,”Personnel Journal.Vol. 52, No. 9, pp. 800–803.
10.
FrenchJohnJr.KayEmanuelMeyerHerbert H. (1966)., “Participation and the Appraisal System,”Human Relations19 (February): 3–20.
11.
GouldnerAlvin W. (1957)., “Cosmopolitans and Locals: Towards an Analysis of Latent Social Roles, I,”Administrative Science Quarterly2 (December): 281–306.
12.
GrellerMartin (1975)., “Subordinate Participation and Reactions to the Appraisal Interview,”Journal of Applied Psychology60 (October): 544–549.
HellreigelD.SlocumJ. W.Jr. (1974). “Organization Climate: Measures, Research and Contingencies,”Academy of Management Journal, pp. 255–280.
15.
HesperGeorgeWollToby (1976)., “The Demand for Participation Among Employees,”Human Relations29 (May): 411–428.
16.
HerzbergFrederick (1959). Motivation to Work.New York: John Wiley.
17.
HerzbergFrederick (1966). Work and the Nature of Man.New York: Thomas Crowell.
18.
HilleryJ.WexleyK. (1974)., “Participation Effects in Appraisal Interviews Conducted in a Training Situation,”Journal of Applied Psychology59 (April): 168–171.
19.
KindallAlva F.GatzaJames (1963)., “Positive Program for Performance Appraisal,”Harvard Business Review41 (November/December): 153–166.
20.
LikertRenis (1959)., “Motivational Approach to Management Development,”Harvard Business Review37 (July/August): 75–182.
21.
LipskyMichael (1980). Street Level Bureaucracy.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
LovrichN.ShafferP.YaleD.HopkinsR. (1979). “Participative Performance Appraisal in the State of Washington,”Intergovernmental Personnel Notes (May/June): 13–16.
23.
LovrichN.ShafferP.YaleD.HopkinsR. (1980)., “Do Public Servants Welcome or Fear Merit Evaluation of Their Performance?”Public Administration Review49 (May/June): 214–222.
24.
LovrichN.ShafferP.YaleD.HopkinsR. (1981)., “Quasi-Experimental Pilot Study of a Participative Performance Appraisal System in Six Washington State Agencies: Effects Upon Job Satisfaction, Agency Climate, and Work Values,”Review of Public Personnel Administration1 (Summer): 51–73.
25.
LovrichN.BishopD.HopkinsR.ShafferP. (1983)., “Participate Performance Appraisal in a Municipal Setting: A Pre- and Post-Implementation Study,”State and Local Government Review15 (Winter): 24–31.
26.
McGregorDouglas (1957)., “An Uneasy Look at Performance Appraisal,”Harvard Business Review35 (May/June): 89–94.
27.
MaierNorman R. F. (1958). The Appraisal Interview: Objectives, Methods, and Skills.New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
28.
MeyerH.KayE.FrenchJohnJr. (1965)., “Split Roles in Performance Appraisal,”Harvard Business Review43 (January/February): 123–129.
29.
MinerJ. B. (1969). Personnel and Industrial Relations: A Managerial Approach.New York: MacMillan.
30.
MorganJ. S. (1964)., “The Supervisor's Three Toughest Communication Problems: No. 3 Appraisal,”Supervisory Management11 (November): 20–22.
31.
MorriseyGeorge L. (1983). Performance Appraisal in the Public Sector.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
32.
NalbandianJohn (1981)., “Performance Appraisal: If Only People Were Not Involved,”Public Administration Review41 (May/June): 392–396.
33.
NewmanJohn E. (1977). “Development of a Measure of Perceived Work Environment,”Academy of Management Journal.Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 520–534.
34.
Public Services Laboratory (1975). Do Productivity Measures Pay Off for Employee Performance?Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University.
35.
SalingerRuth D. (1980). “Disincentives to Effective Employee Training and Development,” pp. 378–392 in LevineMarvin J. (ed.). Public Personnel Management.Salt Lake City, UT: Brighton Publishing Company.
36.
SchneiderB.HallD. (1972). “Toward Specifying the Concept of Work Climate: A Study of Roman Catholic Diocesan Priests,”Journal of Applied Psychology.Vol. 56, pp. 447–455.
37.
ShafritzJay M. (1974)., “The Cancer Eroding Public Personnel Professionalism,”Public Personnel Management3 (November/December).
38.
SmithPatricia C.KendallLane M.HulinCharles L. (1969). The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement.Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally and Company.
39.
StoneThomas H. (1973)., “An Examination of Six Prevalent Assumptions Concerning Performance Appraisal,”Public Personnel Management2 (November/December): 408–414.
40.
ThompsonPaulDaltonGene (1970)., “Performance Appraisal: Managers Beware,”Harvard Business Review48 (January/February): 149–157.
41.
WexleyK.SinghJ. P.YuklG. A. (1973)., “Subordinate Personality as a Moderator of the Effects of Participation in Three Types of Appraisal Interviews,”Journal of Applied Psychology58 (February): 54–59.
42.
VroomVictor (1960)., “Some Personality Determinant of the Effects of Participation,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology59 (November): 322–327.
43.
VroomVictor (1964). Work and Motivation.New York: John Wiley and Sons.