ChapmanSamuel G.SwansonCheryl G.A Descriptive Profile of the Assault Incident.Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma, 1974.
4.
DollarBarry“A Win-Win Situation for Everyone But the Attorneys or How Eureka Slashed Its Exposure to Worker's Compensation Claims and Disability Retirements.”Journal of California Law Enforcement, 17(1), 1983.
5.
HernandezErnieJr.Problems and Implications in Validating Physical Agility Test Criteria in Law Enforcement. Paper presented to American Society of Criminology, Annual ASC Meetings, 1981.
6.
HernandezErnieJr.“Physical Agility Remedial Training.”Journal of Police Science and Administration, 11(1), 1983.
7.
HorstmanPreston L.“Assaults on Police Officers.”The Police Chief, December, 1973, p. 44.
8.
Los Angeles County Sheriff's DepartmentMethodology for the Establishment of a Validated Physical Agility Tests.Los Angeles, California: Los Angeles County, 1976.
9.
MaherPatrick T.LonerganThomas F.A Comparison Of Role Performance and Role Perception Among Police Officers. Unpublished Masters Thesis, 1974.
10.
MoormanCharles B.WemmerRichard C.“Law Enforcement Officers Murdered in California — 1982.”Journal of California Law Enforcement, 17(1), 1983.
11.
PattersonM. J.“Training Tailored for Women.”Police Magazine, Sept., 1980, 23–29.
12.
PriceC. S.PollockM. L.GettmanL. R.KentD. A.Physical Fitness Programs for Law Enforcement Officers: A Manual for Police Administrators.Washington, D. C.: LEAA, U.S., Department of Justice, 1977.
13.
SchwartzRobert A.McGowanHarvey E.Analysis of Assaulted and Non-Assaulted Officers by Height, Weight, Tenure, and Assignment.Portland, Oregon: Portland Bureau of Police, 1973.
14.
Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978); 43 FR 38290, August 24, 1978).