BelcherD. W.Compensation Administration.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974. Blumrosen, R. G. Wage discrimination, job segregation, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 1979, 12, 397–502.
2.
CruneJ. A.Manual on pay equity: Raising wages for women's work. Washington, D.C.: Conference on Alternative State and Local Policies, 1980.
3.
GordonM. E.KleimanL. S.HanieC. A.Industrial-organizational psychology, “Open Thy Ears 0' House of Israel.”American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 893–905.
4.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R.Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159–170.
5.
JohnsonE.Testimony of Eve Johnson, Coordinator of Women's Activities of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission hearings on job segregation and wage discrimination. Washington, D.C.: AFSCME, 1980.
6.
KrzystofiakF.NewmanJ. M.AndersonG.A quantified approach to measurement of job content: Procedures and payoffs. Personal Psychology, 1979, 32, 341–357.
7.
LissitzR. W.MendozaJ. L.HubertyC. J.MarkosH. V.Some further ideas on a methodology for determining job similarities/differences. Personnel Psychology, 179, 32, 517–528.
8.
LivernashE. R. (Ed.) Comparable worth: Issues and alternatives. Washington, D.C.: Equal Employment Advisory Council, 1980.
9.
McCormickE. J.JeanneretP. R.MechamR. C.A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ). Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972, 56, 347–368.
10.
MechanR. C. Personal communication, 1980.
11.
MilkovichG. T.The emerging debate. In LivernashE. R. (Ed.), Comparable Worth: Issues and Alternatives, Washington, D.C.: Equal Employment Advisory Council, 1980, 23–47
12.
MilkovichG. T.BroderickR.Pay discrimination: Legal issues and implications for research. Industrial Relations, 1982, 21(3), 309–317.
13.
NelsonB. A.OptonE. M.Jr.WilsonT. E.Wage discrimination and the “comparable worth” theory in perspective. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 1980, 13, 233–301.
RemickH.The comparable worth controversy. Public Personnel Management Journal, 1981, 371–383
16.
SchwabD. P.Job evaluation and pay setting: Concepts and practices. In LivernashE. R. (Ed.), Comparable Worth: Issues and Alternatives. Washington, D.C.: Equal Employment Advisory Council, 1980, 51–77
17.
SchwabD. P.WichernD. W.Systematic bias in job evaluation and market wages: Implications for the comparable worth debate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983, 68(1), 60–69.
18.
SmithJ. E.HakelM. D.Convergence among data sources, response bias and reliability and validity of a structured job analysis questionnaire. Personnel Psychology, 1979, 32, 677–708.
SpelfogelE. J.Equal pay for work of comparable value: A new concept. Labor Law Journal, 1981.
21.
TreimanD. J.Job evaluation: An analytic review.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1979.
22.
TreimanD. J.HartmannH. I. (Eds.). Women, work, and wages: Equal pay for jobs of equal value.Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1981.
23.
U.S. Department of Labor.The female-male earnings gap: A review of employment and earnings issues. (Report 673, No. 3, Third Quarter, 1978), Washington, D.C.: Author, September, 1982.