PrimoffE. S. Personal communication, August 10, 1981.
2.
RemickH.Comparable worth definitions. Unpublished manuscript, March 1981. (Available from: Office for Affirmative Action, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.)
3.
WillisN. D.State of Washington comparable worth study. Unpublished manuscript, September 1974. (Available from: Norman D. Willis & Associates, 812 3rd Avenue, Seattle, Washington, 98101.)
4.
BrumbackG. B.One method is not enough;An overview of selection oriented job analysis methodology. Paper presented at the Selection Specialist's Symposium of the International Personnel Management Association, Chicago, Illinois, 1976. (Available from: 724 Wilson Avenue, Rockville, MD 20850.)
5.
McCormickE. J. Personal communication, June 12, 1981.
6.
LawsheC. H. Personal communication, June 13, 1981.
7.
ShartleC. L. Personal communication, June 15, 1981.
8.
BeattyR. W.BeattyJ. R.Job evaluation and discrimination: Legal, psychological and economic perspectives on comparable worth and women's pay. Unpublished manuscript, 1981. (Available from: University of Colorado, School of Business, Boulder, Colorado 80302.)
9.
LandauK. Personal communication, July 15, 1981.
10.
German Federal Diet, 8th Legislative Period. Federal Republic of Germany, Federal Ministry of Youth, Family and Health. Information from the Federal Government. Subject area 8. Printed Matter 8/547, June 3, 1977.
11.
Peterson-HardtS.Sex differences in occupational achievement: A structural analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, 1981. (Available from: Department of Sociology, Russell Sage College, Troy, New York.)
12.
American Psychological Association.Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Supplement. Psychological Bulletin, 1954, 51, 201–238.
13.
American Psychological Association.Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1966.
14.
American Psychological Association.Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1974.
15.
American Psychological Association, Division 14, Division of Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures. Dayton, Ohio: Author, 1975.
16.
American Psychological Association, Division of Industrial-Organizational Psychology.Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (Second Edition). Berkeley, CA: Author, 1980.
17.
AndersonC. H.CortsD. B.Development of a framework for a factor-ranking benchmark system of job evaluation. TS-73-3. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center, December 1973.
18.
AtchisonT.FrenchW.Pay systems for scientists and engineers. Industrial Relations, 1967, 7(1), 44–56.
19.
BellaceJ. R.A foreign perspective. In LivernashE. R. (Ed.), Comparable worth: Issues and alternatives. Washington, D.C.: Equal Employment Advisory Council, 1980.
20.
BlumrosenR. G. Wage discrimination, job segregation, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 1979, 12(3), 397–502.
21.
BurnsM.Understanding job evaluation. London: Institute of Personnel Management, 1978.
22.
CohenM. S. Sex differences compensation. Journal of Human Resources, 1971, VI (4), 434–447
23.
CohenB. G. F.SmithM. J.StammerjohnL. W.Jr.Psychosocial factors contributing to job stress of clerical VDT operators. InProceedings from the International Conference on Machine Pacing and Occupational Stress. Held at Purdue University. London: Taylor & Francis, Ltd., March 17–19, 1981.
24.
CooperC. L.MarshallJ. (Eds.) White collar and professional stress.New York: Wiley, 1980.
25.
CoxonA. P. M.JonesC. L.The images of occupational prestige: A study in social cognition.New York: St. Martin's, 1978.
26.
CoxonA. P. M.JonesC. L.Class and hierarchy: The social meaning of occupations.New York: St. Martin's, 1979.
27.
CraverG.Job evaluation practices in state and county governments. In SuskinH. (Ed.), Job evaluation and pay administration in the public sector. Washington, D.C.: International Personnel Management Association, 1977.
FineS. A.Functional job analysis scales: A desk aid. Methods for Manpower Analysis, No. 7. Kalamazoo, Michigan: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, April 1973.
30.
FryerD. H.HenryE. R. (Eds.) Handbook of applied psychology. (Vol. 1). New York: Rinehart, 1950.
31.
GittC. E.GelbM.Beyond the Equal Pay Act: Expanding wage differential protections under Title VII. Loyola University Law Review, 1977, 8, 723–766.
32.
HedgesJ. N.MellorE. F.Weekly and hourly earnings of U.S. workers, 1967–78. Monthly Labor Review, 1979, 102(8), 31–41.
33.
HelbergerC.Work analysis as a means to achieve equal pay for working women: The Federal Republic of Germany. In RatnerR. S. (Ed.), Equal employment policy for women—Strategies for implementation in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe.Philadelphia: Temple University, 1980.
34.
HendersonR. I.ClarkeK. L.Job pay for job worth: Designing and managing an equitable job classification and pay system. Research Monographs 86. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University, 1981.
35.
HillJ. A.Women in gainful occupations, 1870–1920. Census Monographs IX. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation, 1972. (Originally published, 1929.)
36.
International Women's Year Commission Report, U.S. Senate.Congressional Record, September 27, 1976, S16703–S16739
37.
JeanneretP. R.Equitable job evaluation and classification with the Position Analysis Questionnaire. Compensation Review, 1980, 12(1), 32–42.
38.
LandauK.RohmertW.AET: A new job analysis method. Proceedings of Spring Annual Conference and World Productivity Congress, American Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc., Detroit, May 17–21, 1981, 751–760
39.
LeonC.BednarzikR. W.A profile of women on part-time schedules. Monthly Labor Review, 1978, 101(10), 3–12.
40.
LivernashE. R. (Ed.) Comparable worth: Issues and alternatives. Washington, D.C.: Equal Employment Advisory Council, 1980a.
41.
LivernashE. R.An overview. In LivernashE. R. (Ed.) Comparable worth: Issues and alternatives. Washington, D.C.: Equal Employment Advisory Council, 1980b.
42.
McCormickE. J.JeanneretP. R.MechamR. C.A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire. Contract Nonr-1100(28), Report No. 6: Final Report. Washington, D.C.: Office of Naval Research, June 1969.
43.
McCormickE. J.JeanneretP. R.MechamR. C.A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ). Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 1972, 56(4), 347–368.
44.
McCormickE. J.Job analysis: Methods and applications.New York: AMACOM, a division of American Management Associations, 1979.
45.
MillinL. F.Women in the federal service. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Civil Service Commission, 1938.
46.
MaddenJ. M.The effect of varying the degree of rater familiarity in job evaluation. Personnel Administration, 1962, 25(6), 42–46.
47.
MaddenJ. M.A further note on the familiarity effect in job evaluation. Personnel Administration, 1963, 26(6), 52–54.
48.
NievaV. F.GutekB. A.Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 1980, 5(2), 267–276.
49.
O'KellyC. G.The ‘impact’ of equal employment legislation on women's earnings: Limitations of legislative solutions to discrimination in the economy. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1979, 38(4), 419–430.
50.
OtisJ. S.LeukartR. H.Job evaluation: A basis for sound wage administration. (2nd ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall, 1954.
51.
Pandora's worth. Wall Street Journal, July 16, 1981, p. 24.
52.
RatnerR. S.The policy and problem: Overview of seven countries. In RatnerR. S. (Ed.), Equal employment policy women: Strategies for implementation in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe.Philadelphia: Temple University, 1980.
53.
RemickH.Strategies for creating sound, bias-free job evaluation plans. In Industrial Relations Counselors, Inc. Job evaluation and EEO: The emerging issues.New York: Author, 1978.
54.
RemickH.Beyond equal pay for equal work: Comparable worth in the state of Washington. In RatnerR. S. (Ed.), Equal employment policy for women.Philadelphia: Temple University, 1980.
55.
RohmertW.RutenfranzJ.Arbeitswissenschalftliche Beurteilung: DerBelastung und underschiedlichen industriellen Arbeitsplatzen. Bonn: Bundesrepublik, Der Bundesminister für Arbeit und Sozialordnung, 1975.
56.
RohmertW.LuczakH.KuglerH.Geschlechtstypische Unterschiede aus der Sicht det Arbeitswissenschaft. In Eckert, R. (Hrsg.), Geschlectsrollen und Arbeitsteilung Mann und Frau in soziologischer Sicht. München: C. H. Beck, 1979.
57.
RohmertW.LandauI.Das Arbeitswissenschaftliche Erhebungsverfahren zur Tätigheitsanalyse—AET. Handbuch (Band I). Merkmalheft (Band II). Bern: Hans Huber, 1979.
58.
RonenS.Flexible working hours: An innovation in the quality of work life.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
59.
RytinaN. F.Occupational segregation and earnings differences by sex. Monthly Labor Review, 1981, 104(1), 49–53.
60.
SaintA. M.Women in the public service: 1-A general survey. Public Personnel Studies, 1930, 8(4), 46–54.
61.
SchwabD. P.Job evaluation and pay setting: Concepts and practices. In LivernashE. R. (Ed.), Comparable worth: Issues and alternatives. Washington, D.C.: Equal Employment Advisory Council, 1980.
62.
ShartleC. L.Job classification and evaluation. In FryerD. H.HenryE. R. (Eds.), Handbook of applied psychology. (Vol. 1). New York: Rinehart, 1950.
63.
SmithJ. P.WelchF.Race differences in earnings: A survey and new evidence. R-2295-NSF. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, March 1978.
64.
SmithM. J.CohenB. G. F.StammerjohnL. W.HappA.An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operations. Human factors, in press.
65.
StoneP.Do you know the pay in San José?Union W.A.G.E. May/June 1981, 65, p. 1 ff.
66.
TreimanD. J.Job evaluation: An analytic review: Interim report to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1979.
67.
U.S. Department of Labor, Women's Bureau.The earnings gap between women and men.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.
68.
U.S. Department of Labor, Women's Bureau. Twenty facts on women workers. December 1980.
69.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (USEEOC). Guidelines on employment testing procedures, Federal Register, August 24, 1966.
70.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (USEEOC).Guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, August 1, 1970, 35, 12333–12336.
71.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (USEEOC).U.S. Civil Service Commission, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of Justice. Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, August 25, 1978, 43(166), 38290–38315.
72.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (USEEOC).Hearings on job segregation and wage discrimination. Washington, D.C.: Author, April 28–30, 1980.
73.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Office of Intergovernmental Personnel Programs.Equal employment opportunity court cases. Washington, D.C.: Author, September 1979.
74.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Office of Intergovernmental Personnel Programs.Equal employment opportunity court cases. Washington, D.C.: Author, October 1980.
75.
U.S. Treasury Department.The U.S. Treasury Register.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1875.
76.
Van RiperP. P.History of the United States civil service. Evanston, IL: Row and Peterson, 1958.
77.
WallaceM. J.KreftingL. A.External and internal constraints on wage policy: The case of a municipality. Proceedings of Academy of Management, 1975, 463–465
78.
WishM.CarrollJ. D.Appreciations of individual differences scaling to studies of human perception and judgment. In CarteretteE. C.FriedmanM. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception: Psychological judgment and measurement. (Vol. II). New York: Academic Press, 1974.