The management of poor performers significantly affects their coworkers’ behaviors. Using the glass floor effect and social loafing theory, this study found that public employees’ perceptions of poor performer mismanagement varied based on their gender, race, age, disability, and leader status. Moreover, the mismanagement of poor performers significantly increased their coworkers’ turnover intention, with affective organizational commitment serving as a significant mediator in this relationship. Furthermore, the influence of mismanagement of poor performers on their coworkers’ turnover intention decreased as the level of organizational communication increased. These results highlight the critical importance of effective management of poor performers.
AbdienM. (2019). Impact of communication satisfaction and work-life balance on employee turnover intention. Journal of Tourism Theory and Research, 5(2), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.24288/jttr.526678
2.
AdamsJ. S. (1961). Reduction of cognitive dissonance by seeking consonant information. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047029
3.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction. SAGE Publication.
4.
AlbrechtS. L.MartyA. (2020). Personality, self-efficacy and job resources and their associations with employee engagement, affective commitment and turnover intentions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(5), 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1362660
5.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506
6.
AndrewsR.BoyneG. A.EnticottG. (2006). Performance failure in the public sector: Misfortune or mismanagement?Public Management Review, 8(2), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600587612
7.
A’yuninnisaR. N.SaptotoR. (2015). The effects of pay satisfaction and affective commitment on turnover intention. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 4(2), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsp.2015.1055
8.
BakerM. (2024). Public sector job security and how it is related to employee performance [Doctoral dissertation, California State University].
9.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
10.
BothmaC. F.RoodtG. (2013). The validation of the turnover intention scale. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 1–12.
11.
BrackenD. W.TimmreckC. W.ChurchA. H. (2001). The handbook of multisource feedback. Jossey-Bass.
12.
BrownJ. D. (2014). Self-esteem and self-evaluation: Feeling is believing. Psychological Perspectives on the Self, 4, 27–58.
13.
CherrierH.GoswamiP.RayS. (2018). Social entrepreneurship: Creating value in the context of institutional complexity. Journal of Business Research, 86, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.056
14.
ChillakuriB. (2020). Understanding generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058
15.
CohenK. R.HanoverK. (2019). Preparing the right physicians to be exceptional leaders in the 21st century: How to maximize their success most cost-effectively and efficiently. In CostleyC. (Ed.), Preparing Physicians to Lead in the 21st Century (pp. 56–70). IGI.
16.
DaleyD. M. (2008). The burden of dealing with poor performers: Wear and tear on supervisory organizational engagement. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X07311253
17.
DestlerK. N. (2017). A matter of trust: Street level bureaucrats, organizational climate and performance management reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw055
18.
DownsC. W.HazenM. D. (1977). A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 14(3), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194367701400306
FelpsW.MitchellT. R.ByingtonE. (2006). How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 175–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27005-9
22.
FergusonA. J.OrmistonM. E.MoonH. (2010). From approach to inhibition: The influence of power on responses to poor performers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018376
23.
FletcherC. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167488
24.
GneezyU.NiederleM.RustichiniA. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049–1074. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360698496
GugushviliA.BukodiE.GoldthorpeJ. H. (2017). The direct effect of social origins on social mobility chances: ‘Glass floors’ and ‘glass ceilings’ in Britain. European Sociological Review, 33(2), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx043
27.
HvidmanU.AndersenS. C. (2014). Impact of performance management in public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut019
28.
HoodC. (1998). Doing public management the egalitarian way? In HoodC. (Ed.), The Art of the State, Culture Rhetoric and Public Management (pp. 120–144). Oxford, Clarendon Press.
LatanéB.WilliamsK.HarkinsS. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822
31.
MaslachC.LeiterM. P. (2000). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. John Wiley & Sons.
32.
McQuillanP. J.Salomon-FernandezY. (2008). The impact of state intervention on underperforming schools in Massachusetts: Implications for policy and practice. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 16, 1–43.
33.
MercurioZ. A. (2015). Affective commitment as a core essence of organizational commitment: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 14(4), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315603612
34.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011
35.
MitchellT. R.WoodR. E. (1980). Supervisor’s responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(80)90029
36.
MohaleA. B.LitshaniN. F.MashauT. S.MoyoH. (2021). A critical review on academic performance improvement plans of underperforming rural public high schools in Mopani West District, Limpopo Province. Gender and Behaviour, 19(1), 17335–17355.
37.
MunteanuI.NewcomerK. (2020). Leading and learning through dynamic performance management in government. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13126
38.
Office of Personnel Management. (2024). Federal employee viewpoint survey results. Office of Personnel Management.
39.
PoppeL. B.GrankoR. P. (2011). Managing underperformers. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 68(22), 2123–2125. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp110074
40.
RingelmannM. (1913). Recherches sur les Moteurs Animés: Travail de L’homme. Annales de L’Institut National Agronomique.
41.
RhoadesL.EisenbergerR.ArmeliS. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825
42.
RobertsK. H.O’ReillyC. A. (1974). Measuring organizational communication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036660
43.
RubinoC.AveryD. R.VolponeS. D.FordL. (2014). Does teaming obscure low performance? Exploring the temporal effects of team performance diversity. Human Performance, 27(5), 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2014.956175
44.
SalaminA.HomP. W. (2005). In search of the elusive u-shaped performance-turnover relationship: Are high performing Swiss bankers more liable to quit?Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1204–1216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1204
45.
SchmaderT.JohnsM.ForbesC. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
46.
SimmsA.NicholsT. (2014). Social loafing: A review of the literature. Journal of Management, 15(1), 58–67.
47.
SimsionG. (2007). Data modeling: Theory and practice. Technics Publishing.
48.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723
49.
SpencerS. J.LogelC.DaviesP. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1146
50.
SunR.WangW. (2017). Transformational leadership, employee turnover intention, and actual voluntary turnover in public organizations. Public Management Review, 19(8), 1124–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1257063
51.
TaggarS.NeubertM. (2004). The impact of poor performers on team outcomes: An empirical examination of attribution theory. Personnel Psychology, 57(4), 935–968. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00011
52.
TaylorM. S.AudiaG.GuptaA. K. (1996). The effect of lengthening job tenure on managers’ organizational commitment and turnover. Organization Science, 7(6), 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.6.632
53.
TourishD.RobsonP. (2006). Sensemaking and the distortion of critical upward communication in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 711–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00608
54.
TrevorC. O.PiyanontaleeR. (2020). Discharges, poor-performer quits, and layoffs as valued exits: Is it really addition by subtraction?Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1146
55.
TsaiM. T.ChuangS. S.HsiehW. P. (2009). An integrated process model of communication satisfaction and organizational outcomes. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(6), 825–834. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.6.825
56.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2015). Improved supervision and better use of probationary periods are needed to address substandard employee performance. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-15-191.pdf
57.
VandenbergheC.BenteinK.StinglhamberF. (2004). Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00029
58.
WirthJ. H.SaccoD. F.BrownM.OkdieB. M. (2021). I hate to be a burden!: Experiencing feelings associated with ostracism due to one’s poor performance burdening the group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4–5), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2738
59.
WuP.ChenT.LeungK. (2011). Toward performance-based compensation: A study of the gaps between organizational practices and employee preferences with regard to compensation criteria in the state-owned sector in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(9), 1986–2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.573974
60.
WulurL.MandagiD. W. (2023). Employee performance 2.0: Antecedents and consequences of gen Z employees performance. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 6(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v6i2.5078
61.
XiM.HeW.FehrR.ZhaoS. (2022). Feeling anxious and abusing low performers: A multilevel model of high performance work systems and abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2558
62.
YuklG. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
