Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-12
U.S. Federal Employees With Disabilities: How Perceptions of Diversity,Equity,Inclusion,and Accessibility Affect Differences in Job Satisfaction,Organizational Commitment,and Job Involvement
Using the 2022 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, this study examines whether perceptions of diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) help explain why federal employees with disabilities have lower levels of three predictors of work motivation: job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job involvement. All aspects of DEIA have impacts, but accessibility matters most. People with disabilities have greater accessibility needs and are less satisfied with organizational responses; this difference explains much of why they have lower DEI perceptions. Lower DEIA perceptions account for nearly all the differences in job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job involvement. Although the federal service has been more effective than other sectors in achieving representation of employees with disabilities, objective measures of disability representation have minimal impact on these outcome variables. Instead, improving accessibility appears to be the key tool to making full use of the talents of federal employees with disabilities, alongside more equitable development and advancement opportunities and the espousal and enactment of inclusive leadership practices.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press.
2.
AkabasS. H. (1994). Workplace responsiveness: Key employer characteristics in support of job maintenance for people with mental illness. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 17, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095572
3.
BakerP. M. A.LindenM. A.LaForceS. S.RutledgeJ.GoughnourK. P. (2018). Barriers to employment participation of individuals with disabilities: Addressing the impact of employer (mis)perception and policy. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(5), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218768868
4.
BakhshiA.KumarK.RaniE. (2009). Organizational justice perceptions as predictor of job satisfaction and organization commitment. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(9), 145–154.
5.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
7.
BaumgärtnerM. K.DwertmannD. J. G.BoehmS. A.BruchH. (2015). Job satisfaction of employees with disabilities: The role of perceived structural flexibility. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21673
8.
BeattyJ. E.BaldridgeD. C.BoehmS. A.KulkarniM.ColellaA. J. (2019). On the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 58(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21940
9.
BeckerG. S. (1957). The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press.
10.
BlanckP. (2020). Disability inclusive employment and the accommodation principle: Emerging issues in research, policy, and law. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30(4), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09940-9
11.
BlanckP.HyseniF.Altunkol WiseF. (2020). Diversity and inclusion in the American legal profession: Workplace accommodations for lawyers with disabilities and lawyers who identify as LGBTQ+. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30(4), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09938-0
12.
BoehmS. A.BreierC.BaumgaertnerM. K. (2019). Getting stuck on the corporate ladder: The effect of disability on career progress. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 14611. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.195
13.
BonaccioS.ConnellyC. E.GellatlyI. R.JethaA.Martin GinisK. A. (2020). The participation of people with disabilities in the workplace across the employment cycle: Employer concerns and research evidence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5
14.
BranhamS. M.KaneS. K. (2015, October). The invisible work of accessibility: How blind employees manage accessibility in mixed-ability workplaces [Conference session]. 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility, Lisbon, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809864
15.
BrekhusW. (1998). A sociology of the unmarked: Redirecting our focus. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 34–51.
16.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
17.
BricoutJ. C. (2004). Using telework to enhance return to work outcomes for individuals with spinal cord injuries. NeuroRehabilitation, 19, 147–159.
18.
BricoutJ. C.BakerP. M. A.WardA. C.MoonN. W. (2010). Teleworking and the “disability divide.” In FerroE.DwivediY. K.Gil-GarciaJ. R.WilliamsM. D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on overcoming digital divides (pp. 155–178). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-699-0.ch009
19.
BruyèreS. (2000). Disability employment policies and practices in private and federal sector organizations. Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations Extension Division, Program on Employment and Disability.
20.
ChoiS.RaineyH. G. (2014). Organizational fairness and diversity management in public organizations: Does fairness matter in managing diversity?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(4), 307–331.
21.
ChordiyaR. (2022). Organizational inclusion and turnover intentions of federal employees with disabilities. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 60–87.
22.
ChordiyaR.DolamoreS.LoveJ. M.BorryE. L.ProtonentisA.SternB.WhitebreadG. (2023). Staking the tent at the margins: Using disability justice to expand the theory and praxis of social equity in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 46(1), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2023.2216616
23.
ChordiyaR.SabharwalM.GoodmanD. (2017). Affective organizational commitment and job satisfaction: A cross-national comparative study. Public Administration, 95(1), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12306
24.
ConyersL.UngerD.RumrillP. D.Jr. (2005). A comparison of equal employment opportunity commission case resolution patterns of people with HIV/AIDS and other disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22(3), 171–178.
25.
DittrichJ. E.CarrellM. R. (1979). Organizational equity perceptions, employee job satisfaction, and departmental absence and turnover rates. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(79)90013-8
26.
DubinR. (1956). Industrial workers’ worlds: A study of the “central life interests” of industrial workers. Social Problems, 3(3), 131–142.
27.
EmersonE.FortuneN.LlewellynG.StancliffeR. (2021). Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study. Disability Health Journal, 14(1), 100965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965
28.
EmidyM. B. (2024). United States federal employee development in turbulent times: Using job demands-resources theory to explain changes in perceived performance and turnover intention during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X231220860
29.
EnayatiH.von SchraderS.EricksonW.BruyèreS. (2019). Minimizing discrimination and maximizing inclusion: Lessons from the federal workforce and federal subcontractors. In BruyèreS. M. (Ed.), Employment and disability: Issues, innovations, and opportunities (pp. 33–63). Cornell University Press.
FrenkelS. J.BednallT. (2016). How training and promotion opportunities, career expectations, and two dimensions of organizational justice explain discretionary work effort. Human Performance, 29(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1120306
36.
GadeD. M.WilkinsV. M. (2013). Where did you serve? Veteran identity, representative bureaucracy, and vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus030
37.
GatesL. B. (2000). Workplace accommodation as a social process. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009445929841
38.
GatesL. B.AkabasS. H. (2011). Inclusion of people with mental health disabilities into the workplace: Accommodation as a social process. In SchultzI. Z.RogersE. S. (Eds.), Work accommodation and retention in mental health (pp. 375–391). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0428-7_20
39.
GeorgeB.PandeyS. K. (2017). We know the yin—but where is the yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17698189
40.
GignacM. A. M.JethaA.GinisK. A. M.IbrahimS. (2021). Does it matter what your reasons are when deciding to disclose (or not disclose) a disability at work? The association of workers’ approach and avoidance goals with perceived positive and negative workplace outcomes. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 31(3), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09956-1
41.
GilbrideK. (2022). Evolving beyond reasonable accommodations towards “off-shelf accessible” workplaces and campuses. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 30(3), 297–319.
42.
GonzalezK.TillmanC. J.HolmesJ. J. (2019). Coming home: Why veterans with disabilities withhold workplace accommodation requests. Human Relations, 73(10), 1439–1466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719875810
GrahamK. M.McMahonB. T.KimJ. H.SimpsonP.McMahonM. C. (2019). Patterns of workplace discrimination across broad categories of disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 64, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000227
45.
GreenwoodR.JohnsonV. A. (1987). Employer perspectives on workers with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 53(3), 37–45.
46.
HernandezB.McDonaldK. (2010). Exploring the costs and benefits of workers with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 76(3), 15–23.
47.
HoangT.SuhJ.SabharwalM. (2022). Beyond a numbers game? Impact of diversity and inclusion on the perception of organizational justice. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13463
48.
HyseniF.KruseD.SchurL.BlanckP. (2023). Disability, workplace inclusion and organizational citizenship behavior: An exploratory study of the legal profession. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership, 6(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-10-2022-0017
49.
JohnsonT. (2015). Service after serving: Does veterans’ preference diminish the quality of the us federal service?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 669–696.
KennedyA. H.BishuS. G. (2022). This for that: What EEOC trends reveal about representative bureaucracy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20942811
52.
KhanJ.JaafarM.JavedB.MubarakN.SaudagarT. (2020). Does inclusive leadership affect project success? The mediating role of perceived psychological empowerment and psychological safety. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(5), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2019-0267
53.
KitchinR. O. B. (1998). “Out of place,” “knowing one’s place”: Space, power and the exclusion of disabled people. Disability & Society, 13(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826678
54.
KruseD.SchurL.RogersS.AmeriM. (2018). Why do workers with disabilities earn less? Occupational job requirements and disability discrimination. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(4), 798–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12257
55.
KulkarniM.Lengnick-HallM. L. (2011). Socialization of people with disabilities in the workplace. Human Resource Management, 50(4), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20436
56.
KuvaasB.DysvikA. (2010). Exploring alternative relationships between perceived investment in employee development, perceived supervisor support and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00120.x
57.
KwonC. K. (2021). Resisting ableism in deliberately developmental organizations: A discursive analysis of the identity work of employees with disabilities. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21412
58.
Lengnick-HallM. L.GauntP. M.KulkarniM. (2008). Overlooked and underutilized: People with disabilities are an untapped human resource. Human Resource Management, 47(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20211
59.
LeventhalG. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In GergenK. J.GreenbergM. S.WillisR. H. (Eds.), Social exchange (pp. 27–55). Springer.
60.
LewisG. B.AlleeC. L. (1992). The impact of disabilities on federal career success. Public Administration Review, 52(4), 389–397.
61.
LewisG. B.EmidyM. B. (2022). Sexual orientation and organizational justice in the federal service: Exploring differences through an intersectional lens. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(3), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab041
62.
LewisG. B.PathakR. (2023, September27–30). Towards full inclusion? Representation of people with disabilities in the federal government [Conference session]. Southeastern Conference for Public Administration, Atlanta, GA, United States.
63.
LewisG. B.PittsD. W. (2017). LGBT–heterosexual differences in perceptions of fair treatment in the federal service. American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 574–587.
64.
LightJ. S. (2001). Separate but equal? Reasonable accommodation in the information age. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976235
65.
LockeE. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In DunnetteM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1343). Rand McNally.
66.
LodahlT. M.KejnerM. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1), 24–33.
67.
LundE. M.Forber-PrattA. J.WilsonC.MonaL. R. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic, stress, and trauma in the disability community: A call to action. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(4), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000368
68.
MacdonaldS. J.DeaconL.NixonJ.AkintolaA.GillinghamA.KentJ.EllisG.MathewsD.IsmailA.SullivanS.DoreS.HighmoreL. (2018). “The invisible enemy”: Disability, loneliness and isolation. Disability & Society, 33(7), 1138–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1476224
69.
MaestasN.MullenK. J.RennaneS. (2019). Unmet need for workplace accommodation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(4), 1004–1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22148
70.
MaloM. Á.PagánR. (2012). Wage differentials and disability across Europe: Discrimination and/or lower productivity?International Labour Review, 151(1–2), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2012.00134.x
71.
MammanA.KamocheK.BakuwaR. (2012). Diversity, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior: An organizing framework. Human Resource Management Review, 22(4), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.12.003
72.
McCandlessS.BishuS. G.Gómez HernándezM.Paredes ErasoÉ.SabharwalM.SantisE. L.YatesS. (2022). A long road: Patterns and prospects for social equity, diversity, and inclusion in public administration. Public Administration, 100(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12830
73.
MellifontD.Smith-MerryJ.ScanlanJ. N. (2016). Disabling accommodation barriers: A study exploring how to better accommodate government employees with anxiety disorders. Work, 55(3), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162423
74.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.
75.
MeyerJ. P.StanleyD. J.HerscovitchL.TopolnytskyL. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.
76.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2007). Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39(7), 803–832.
77.
MurrayB.KennyS. (1990). Telework as an employment option for people with disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 13, 205–210.
78.
NishiiL. H.LeroyH. (2022). A multi-level framework of inclusive leadership in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), 683–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221111505
79.
OldhamG. R.HackmanJ. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 463–479.
80.
OlsenJ. (2018). Socially disabled: The fight disabled people face against loneliness and stress. Disability & Society, 33(7), 1160–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1459228
PhelpsE. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The American Economic Review, 62(4), 659–661.
83.
PlessN.MaakT. (2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 129–147.
84.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
85.
Purc-StephensonR. J.JonesS. K.FergusonC. L. (2017). “Forget about the glass ceiling, I’m stuck in a glass box”: A meta-ethnography of work participation for persons with physical disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 46, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-160842
86.
RandelA. E.GalvinB. M.ShoreL. M.EhrhartK. H.ChungB. G.DeanM. A.KedharnathU. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002
87.
RiccucciN. M. (2002). Managing diversity in public sector workforces. Westview Press.
88.
RiccucciN. M. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled?Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01984.x
89.
RuppD. E.BashshurM.LiaoH. (2007). Justice climate past, present, and future: Models of structure and emergence. In DansereauF.YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Multi-level issues in organizations and time (Vol. 6, pp. 357–396). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(07)06017-1
90.
SabharwalM. (2014). Is diversity management sufficient? Organizational inclusion to further performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197–217.
91.
SchurL.HanK.KimA.AmeriM.BlanckP.KruseD. (2017). Disability at work: A look back and forward. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 27(4), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9739-5
92.
SchurL.KruseD.BlanckP. (2005). Corporate culture and the employment of persons with disabilities. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.624
93.
SchurL.KruseD.BlasiJ.BlanckP. (2009). Is disability disabling in all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 48(3), 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2009.00565.x
94.
ShandraC. L. (2018). Disability as inequality: Social disparities, health disparities, and participation in daily activities. Social Forces, 97(1), 157–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy031
95.
ShinallJ. B. (2016). Distaste or disability? Evaluating the legal framework for protecting obese workers. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 37(1), 101–142.
96.
ShoreL. M.RandelA. E.ChungB. G.DeanM. A.Holcombe EhrhartK.SinghG. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289.
97.
SimonH. A. (2013). Administrative behavior. Simon and Schuster.
98.
SnyderC. R.FromkinH. L. (1980). Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference. Plenum Press.
99.
SolovievaT. I.WallsR. T. (2013). Implications of workplace accommodations for persons with disabilities. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 28(3), 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2013.808079
100.
SommerK. L.KulkarniM. (2012). Does constructive performance feedback improve citizenship intentions and job satisfaction? The roles of perceived opportunities for advancement, respect, and mood. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23(2), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21132
101.
StazykE. C.PandeyS. K.WrightB. E. (2011). Understanding affective organizational commitment: The importance of institutional context. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011398119
102.
StoneD. L.ColellaA. (1996). A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 352–401. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9605060216
103.
SymaC. (2019). Invisible disabilities: Perceptions and barriers to reasonable accommodations in the workplace. Library Management, 40(1/2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-10-2017-0101
104.
TomasV.AhmedH.LindsayS. (2022). Unravelling the complexities of workplace disclosure among persons with non-visible disabilities and illnesses: A qualitative meta-ethnography. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 32(3), 538–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10023-0
105.
TrianaM. d. C.GuP.ChapaO.RichardO.ColellaA. (2021). Sixty years of discrimination and diversity research in human resource management: A review with suggestions for future research directions. Human Resource Management, 60(1), 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22052
106.
von SchraderS.MalzerV.BruyèreS. (2013). Perspectives on disability disclosure: The importance of employer practices and workplace climate. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26(4), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-013-9227-9
107.
von SchraderS.XuX.BruyèreS. M. (2014). Accommodation requests: Who is asking for what?Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 28(4), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1891/2168-6653.28.4.329
108.
VornholtK.UitdewilligenS.NijhuisF. J. (2013). Factors affecting the acceptance of people with disabilities at work: A literature review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9426-0
109.
WintersJ. V. (2018). Veteran status, disability rating, and public sector employment. Health Economics, 27(6), 1011–1016.
110.
WiseL. R. (1990). Social equity in civil service systems. Public Administration Review, 50(5), 567–575.
111.
WittmerL.-S.LinC. (2017). Valuing employees with disabilities: A chain effect of pro-disability climate on organizational commitment. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i3.5555
112.
WoodhamsC.LuptonB.PerkinsG.CowlingM. (2015). Multiple disadvantage and wage growth: The effect of merit pay on pay gaps. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21692
113.
WrightB. E.HassanS.ParkJ. (2016). Does a public service ethic encourage ethical behavior? Public service motivation, ethical leadership and the willingness to report ethical problems. Public Administration, 94(3), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12248
114.
ZellnerA. (1963). Estimators for seemingly unrelated regression equations: Some exact finite sample results. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(304), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10480681
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
