U.S. Federal Employees With Disabilities: How Perceptions of Diversity,Equity,Inclusion,and Accessibility Affect Differences in Job Satisfaction,Organizational Commitment,and Job Involvement

Abstract

Using the 2022 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, this study examines whether perceptions of diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) help explain why federal employees with disabilities have lower levels of three predictors of work motivation: job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job involvement. All aspects of DEIA have impacts, but accessibility matters most. People with disabilities have greater accessibility needs and are less satisfied with organizational responses; this difference explains much of why they have lower DEI perceptions. Lower DEIA perceptions account for nearly all the differences in job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job involvement. Although the federal service has been more effective than other sectors in achieving representation of employees with disabilities, objective measures of disability representation have minimal impact on these outcome variables. Instead, improving accessibility appears to be the key tool to making full use of the talents of federal employees with disabilities, alongside more equitable development and advancement opportunities and the espousal and enactment of inclusive leadership practices.

Keywords

diversity workplace attitudes and behaviors employment equity federal government ADA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. S.

(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press.

Akabas

S. H.

(1994). Workplace responsiveness: Key employer characteristics in support of job maintenance for people with mental illness. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 17, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095572

Baker

P. M. A.

Linden

M. A.

LaForce

S. S.

Rutledge

Goughnour

K. P.

(2018). Barriers to employment participation of individuals with disabilities: Addressing the impact of employer (mis)perception and policy. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(5), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218768868

Bakhshi

Kumar

Rani

(2009). Organizational justice perceptions as predictor of job satisfaction and organization commitment. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(9), 145–154.

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Baumgärtner

M. K.

Dwertmann

D. J. G.

Boehm

S. A.

Bruch

(2015). Job satisfaction of employees with disabilities: The role of perceived structural flexibility. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21673

Beatty

J. E.

Baldridge

D. C.

Boehm

S. A.

Kulkarni

Colella

A. J.

(2019). On the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 58(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21940

Becker

G. S.

(1957). The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press.

10.

Blanck

(2020). Disability inclusive employment and the accommodation principle: Emerging issues in research, policy, and law. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30(4), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09940-9

11.

Blanck

Hyseni

Altunkol Wise

(2020). Diversity and inclusion in the American legal profession: Workplace accommodations for lawyers with disabilities and lawyers who identify as LGBTQ+. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30(4), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09938-0

12.

Boehm

S. A.

Breier

Baumgaertner

M. K.

(2019). Getting stuck on the corporate ladder: The effect of disability on career progress. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 14611. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.195

13.

Bonaccio

Connelly

C. E.

Gellatly

I. R.

Jetha

Martin Ginis

K. A.

(2020). The participation of people with disabilities in the workplace across the employment cycle: Employer concerns and research evidence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5

14.

Branham

S. M.

Kane

S. K.

(2015, October). The invisible work of accessibility: How blind employees manage accessibility in mixed-ability workplaces [Conference session]. 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility, Lisbon, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809864

15.

Brekhus

(1998). A sociology of the unmarked: Redirecting our focus. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 34–51.

16.

Brewer

M. B.

(1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001

17.

Bricout

J. C.

(2004). Using telework to enhance return to work outcomes for individuals with spinal cord injuries. NeuroRehabilitation, 19, 147–159.

18.

Bricout

J. C.

Baker

P. M. A.

Ward

A. C.

Moon

N. W.

(2010). Teleworking and the “disability divide.” In Ferro

Dwivedi

Y. K.

Gil-Garcia

J. R.

Williams

M. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on overcoming digital divides (pp. 155–178). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-699-0.ch009

19.

Bruyère

(2000). Disability employment policies and practices in private and federal sector organizations. Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations Extension Division, Program on Employment and Disability.

20.

Choi

Rainey

H. G.

(2014). Organizational fairness and diversity management in public organizations: Does fairness matter in managing diversity? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(4), 307–331.

21.

Chordiya

(2022). Organizational inclusion and turnover intentions of federal employees with disabilities. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 60–87.

22.

Chordiya

Dolamore

Love

J. M.

Borry

E. L.

Protonentis

Stern

Whitebread

(2023). Staking the tent at the margins: Using disability justice to expand the theory and praxis of social equity in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 46(1), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2023.2216616

23.

Chordiya

Sabharwal

Goodman

(2017). Affective organizational commitment and job satisfaction: A cross-national comparative study. Public Administration, 95(1), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12306

24.

Conyers

Unger

Rumrill

P. D.

Jr. (2005). A comparison of equal employment opportunity commission case resolution patterns of people with HIV/AIDS and other disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22(3), 171–178.

25.

Dittrich

J. E.

Carrell

M. R.

(1979). Organizational equity perceptions, employee job satisfaction, and departmental absence and turnover rates. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(79)90013-8

26.

Dubin

(1956). Industrial workers’ worlds: A study of the “central life interests” of industrial workers. Social Problems, 3(3), 131–142.

27.

Emerson

Fortune

Llewellyn

Stancliffe

(2021). Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study. Disability Health Journal, 14(1), 100965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965

28.

Emidy

M. B.

(2024). United States federal employee development in turbulent times: Using job demands-resources theory to explain changes in perceived performance and turnover intention during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X231220860

29.

Enayati

von Schrader

Erickson

Bruyère

(2019). Minimizing discrimination and maximizing inclusion: Lessons from the federal workforce and federal subcontractors. In Bruyère

S. M.

(Ed.), Employment and disability: Issues, innovations, and opportunities (pp. 33–63). Cornell University Press.

30.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2017). Affirmative action for individuals with disabilities in federal employment. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2016-31397

31.

Executive Order 13163. (2000). Increasing the opportunity for individuals with disabilities to be employed in the federal government. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2000-07-28/pdf/00-19322.pdf

32.

Executive Order 13548. (2010). Increasing federal employment of individuals with disabilities. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2011-title3-vol1/CFR-2011-title3-vol1-eo13548

33.

Executive Order 13985. (2021). Advancing racial equity and support for underserved communities through the federal government. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-202100054/pdf/DCPD-202100054.pdf

34.

Executive Order 14035. (2021). Diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in the federal workforce. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-202100538/pdf/DCPD-202100538.pdf

35.

Frenkel

S. J.

Bednall

(2016). How training and promotion opportunities, career expectations, and two dimensions of organizational justice explain discretionary work effort. Human Performance, 29(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1120306

36.

Gade

D. M.

Wilkins

V. M.

(2013). Where did you serve? Veteran identity, representative bureaucracy, and vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus030

37.

Gates

L. B.

(2000). Workplace accommodation as a social process. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009445929841

38.

Gates

L. B.

Akabas

S. H.

(2011). Inclusion of people with mental health disabilities into the workplace: Accommodation as a social process. In Schultz

I. Z.

Rogers

E. S.

(Eds.), Work accommodation and retention in mental health (pp. 375–391). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0428-7_20

39.

George

Pandey

S. K.

(2017). We know the yin—but where is the yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17698189

40.

Gignac

M. A. M.

Jetha

Ginis

K. A. M.

Ibrahim

(2021). Does it matter what your reasons are when deciding to disclose (or not disclose) a disability at work? The association of workers’ approach and avoidance goals with perceived positive and negative workplace outcomes. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 31(3), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09956-1

41.

Gilbride

(2022). Evolving beyond reasonable accommodations towards “off-shelf accessible” workplaces and campuses. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 30(3), 297–319.

42.

Gonzalez

Tillman

C. J.

Holmes

J. J.

(2019). Coming home: Why veterans with disabilities withhold workplace accommodation requests. Human Relations, 73(10), 1439–1466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719875810

43.

Gooden

S. T.

(2015). Race and social equity: A nervous area of government. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701301

44.

Graham

K. M.

McMahon

B. T.

Kim

J. H.

Simpson

McMahon

M. C.

(2019). Patterns of workplace discrimination across broad categories of disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 64, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000227

45.

Greenwood

Johnson

V. A.

(1987). Employer perspectives on workers with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 53(3), 37–45.

46.

Hernandez

McDonald

(2010). Exploring the costs and benefits of workers with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 76(3), 15–23.

47.

Hoang

Suh

Sabharwal

(2022). Beyond a numbers game? Impact of diversity and inclusion on the perception of organizational justice. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13463

48.

Hyseni

Kruse

Schur

Blanck

(2023). Disability, workplace inclusion and organizational citizenship behavior: An exploratory study of the legal profession. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership, 6(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-10-2022-0017

49.

Johnson

(2015). Service after serving: Does veterans’ preference diminish the quality of the us federal service? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 669–696.

50.

Jones

G. E.

(1997). Advancement opportunity issues for persons with disabilities. Human Resource Management Review, 7(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(97)90005-X

51.

Kennedy

A. H.

Bishu

S. G.

(2022). This for that: What EEOC trends reveal about representative bureaucracy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20942811

52.

Khan

Jaafar

Javed

Mubarak

Saudagar

(2020). Does inclusive leadership affect project success? The mediating role of perceived psychological empowerment and psychological safety. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(5), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2019-0267

53.

Kitchin

R. O. B.

(1998). “Out of place,” “knowing one’s place”: Space, power and the exclusion of disabled people. Disability & Society, 13(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826678

54.

Kruse

Schur

Rogers

Ameri

(2018). Why do workers with disabilities earn less? Occupational job requirements and disability discrimination. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(4), 798–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12257

55.

Kulkarni

Lengnick-Hall

M. L.

(2011). Socialization of people with disabilities in the workplace. Human Resource Management, 50(4), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20436

56.

Kuvaas

Dysvik

(2010). Exploring alternative relationships between perceived investment in employee development, perceived supervisor support and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00120.x

57.

Kwon

C. K.

(2021). Resisting ableism in deliberately developmental organizations: A discursive analysis of the identity work of employees with disabilities. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21412

58.

Lengnick-Hall

M. L.

Gaunt

P. M.

Kulkarni

(2008). Overlooked and underutilized: People with disabilities are an untapped human resource. Human Resource Management, 47(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20211

59.

Leventhal

G. S.

(1980). What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen

K. J.

Greenberg

M. S.

Willis

R. H.

(Eds.), Social exchange (pp. 27–55). Springer.

60.

Lewis

G. B.

Allee

C. L.

(1992). The impact of disabilities on federal career success. Public Administration Review, 52(4), 389–397.

61.

Lewis

G. B.

Emidy

M. B.

(2022). Sexual orientation and organizational justice in the federal service: Exploring differences through an intersectional lens. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(3), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab041

62.

Lewis

G. B.

Pathak

(2023, September 27–30). Towards full inclusion? Representation of people with disabilities in the federal government [Conference session]. Southeastern Conference for Public Administration, Atlanta, GA, United States.

63.

Lewis

G. B.

Pitts

D. W.

(2017). LGBT–heterosexual differences in perceptions of fair treatment in the federal service. American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 574–587.

64.

Light

J. S.

(2001). Separate but equal? Reasonable accommodation in the information age. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976235

65.

Locke

E. A.

(1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In Dunnette

M. D.

(Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1343). Rand McNally.

66.

Lodahl

T. M.

Kejner

(1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1), 24–33.

67.

Lund

E. M.

Forber-Pratt

A. J.

Wilson

Mona

L. R.

(2020). The COVID-19 pandemic, stress, and trauma in the disability community: A call to action. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(4), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000368

68.

Macdonald

S. J.

Deacon

Nixon

Akintola

Gillingham

Kent

Ellis

Mathews

Ismail

Sullivan

Dore

Highmore

(2018). “The invisible enemy”: Disability, loneliness and isolation. Disability & Society, 33(7), 1138–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1476224

69.

Maestas

Mullen

K. J.

Rennane

(2019). Unmet need for workplace accommodation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(4), 1004–1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22148

70.

Malo

M. Á.

Pagán

(2012). Wage differentials and disability across Europe: Discrimination and/or lower productivity? International Labour Review, 151(1–2), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2012.00134.x

71.

Mamman

Kamoche

Bakuwa

(2012). Diversity, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior: An organizing framework. Human Resource Management Review, 22(4), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.12.003

72.

McCandless

Bishu

S. G.

Gómez Hernández

Paredes Eraso

É.

Sabharwal

Santis

E. L.

Yates

(2022). A long road: Patterns and prospects for social equity, diversity, and inclusion in public administration. Public Administration, 100(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12830

73.

Mellifont

Smith-Merry

Scanlan

J. N.

(2016). Disabling accommodation barriers: A study exploring how to better accommodate government employees with anxiety disorders. Work, 55(3), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162423

74.

Meyer

J. P.

Allen

N. J.

(1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.

75.

Meyer

J. P.

Stanley

D. J.

Herscovitch

Topolnytsky

(2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.

76.

Moynihan

D. P.

Pandey

S. K.

(2007). Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39(7), 803–832.

77.

Murray

Kenny

(1990). Telework as an employment option for people with disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 13, 205–210.

78.

Nishii

L. H.

Leroy

(2022). A multi-level framework of inclusive leadership in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), 683–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221111505

79.

Oldham

G. R.

Hackman

J. R.

(2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 463–479.

80.

Olsen

(2018). Socially disabled: The fight disabled people face against loneliness and stress. Disability & Society, 33(7), 1160–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1459228

81.

Paauwe

(2009). HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00809.x

82.

Phelps

E. S.

(1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The American Economic Review, 62(4), 659–661.

83.

Pless

Maak

(2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 129–147.

84.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

85.

Purc-Stephenson

R. J.

Jones

S. K.

Ferguson

C. L.

(2017). “Forget about the glass ceiling, I’m stuck in a glass box”: A meta-ethnography of work participation for persons with physical disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 46, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-160842

86.

Randel

A. E.

Galvin

B. M.

Shore

L. M.

Ehrhart

K. H.

Chung

B. G.

Dean

M. A.

Kedharnath

(2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002

87.

Riccucci

N. M.

(2002). Managing diversity in public sector workforces. Westview Press.

88.

Riccucci

N. M.

(2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled? Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01984.x

89.

Rupp

D. E.

Bashshur

Liao

(2007). Justice climate past, present, and future: Models of structure and emergence. In Dansereau

Yammarino

F. J.

(Eds.), Multi-level issues in organizations and time (Vol. 6, pp. 357–396). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(07)06017-1

90.

Sabharwal

(2014). Is diversity management sufficient? Organizational inclusion to further performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197–217.

91.

Schur

Han

Kim

Ameri

Blanck

Kruse

(2017). Disability at work: A look back and forward. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 27(4), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9739-5

92.

Schur

Kruse

Blanck

(2005). Corporate culture and the employment of persons with disabilities. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.624

93.

Schur

Kruse

Blasi

Blanck

(2009). Is disability disabling in all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 48(3), 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2009.00565.x

94.

Shandra

C. L.

(2018). Disability as inequality: Social disparities, health disparities, and participation in daily activities. Social Forces, 97(1), 157–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy031

95.

Shinall

J. B.

(2016). Distaste or disability? Evaluating the legal framework for protecting obese workers. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 37(1), 101–142.

96.

Shore

L. M.

Randel

A. E.

Chung

B. G.

Dean

M. A.

Holcombe Ehrhart

Singh

(2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289.

97.

Simon

H. A.

(2013). Administrative behavior. Simon and Schuster.

98.

Snyder

C. R.

Fromkin

H. L.

(1980). Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference. Plenum Press.

99.

Solovieva

T. I.

Walls

R. T.

(2013). Implications of workplace accommodations for persons with disabilities. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 28(3), 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2013.808079

100.

Sommer

K. L.

Kulkarni

(2012). Does constructive performance feedback improve citizenship intentions and job satisfaction? The roles of perceived opportunities for advancement, respect, and mood. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23(2), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21132

101.

Stazyk

E. C.

Pandey

S. K.

Wright

B. E.

(2011). Understanding affective organizational commitment: The importance of institutional context. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011398119

102.

Stone

D. L.

Colella

(1996). A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 352–401. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9605060216

103.

Syma

(2019). Invisible disabilities: Perceptions and barriers to reasonable accommodations in the workplace. Library Management, 40(1/2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-10-2017-0101

104.

Tomas

Ahmed

Lindsay

(2022). Unravelling the complexities of workplace disclosure among persons with non-visible disabilities and illnesses: A qualitative meta-ethnography. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 32(3), 538–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10023-0

105.

Triana

M. d. C.

Chapa

Richard

Colella

(2021). Sixty years of discrimination and diversity research in human resource management: A review with suggestions for future research directions. Human Resource Management, 60(1), 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22052

106.

von Schrader

Malzer

Bruyère

(2013). Perspectives on disability disclosure: The importance of employer practices and workplace climate. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26(4), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-013-9227-9

107.

von Schrader

Bruyère

S. M.

(2014). Accommodation requests: Who is asking for what? Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 28(4), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1891/2168-6653.28.4.329

108.

Vornholt

Uitdewilligen

Nijhuis

F. J.

(2013). Factors affecting the acceptance of people with disabilities at work: A literature review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9426-0

109.

Winters

J. V.

(2018). Veteran status, disability rating, and public sector employment. Health Economics, 27(6), 1011–1016.

110.

Wise

L. R.

(1990). Social equity in civil service systems. Public Administration Review, 50(5), 567–575.

111.

Wittmer

L.-S.

Lin

(2017). Valuing employees with disabilities: A chain effect of pro-disability climate on organizational commitment. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i3.5555

112.

Woodhams

Lupton

Perkins

Cowling

(2015). Multiple disadvantage and wage growth: The effect of merit pay on pay gaps. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21692

113.

Wright

B. E.

Hassan

Park

(2016). Does a public service ethic encourage ethical behavior? Public service motivation, ethical leadership and the willingness to report ethical problems. Public Administration, 94(3), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12248

114.

Zellner

(1963). Estimators for seemingly unrelated regression equations: Some exact finite sample results. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(304), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10480681

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB