Public virtues can help street-level bureaucracies reflect and respond to the shortcomings in current public administration. According to the public virtue approach, this research identifies the key role of ethical leadership in improving the enforcement of street-level bureaucrats (SLBs). By promoting subordinates’ psychological empowerment, ethical leadership is significantly and positively correlated with facilitation, accommodation, and legal style. Public service motivation and organizational citizenship behavior moderate the above processes in diverse ways. This research calls for bringing public virtue back to street-level practices, and particularly for educating and encouraging the public sector about ethical leadership that will provide values, guidance, and empower SLBs to exercise virtue.
AdamsG. B.BalfourD. L. (2010). Market-based government and the decline of organizational ethics:. Administration & Society, 42(6), 615–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710381347
2.
AveyJ. B.WernsingT. S.PalanskiM. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1298-2
3.
AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
4.
BaeK.-S.ChumaH.KatoT.KimD.-B.OhashiI. (2011). High performance work practices and employee voice: A comparison of Japanese and Korean workers. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 50(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2010.00623.x
5.
BellS. J.MengucB. (2002). The employee-organization relationship, organizational citizenship behaviors, and superior service quality. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(02)00069-6
6.
BouckenoogheD.ZafarA.RajaU. (2015). How ethical leadership shapes employees’ job performance: The mediating roles of goal congruence and psychological capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2162-3
7.
BowmanJ. S. (2007). Virtue ethics. In Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy (2nd ed.) (pp. 2028–2032). Routledge.
8.
BozemanB. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Georgetown University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2tt37c
9.
BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K.HarrisonD. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
10.
ÇetinF.AşkunD. (2018). The effect of occupational self-efficacy on work performance through intrinsic work motivation. Management Research Review, 41(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0062
11.
CourseyD. H.PandeyS. K. (2007). Public service motivation measurement: Testing an abridged version of Perry’s proposed scale. Administration & Society, 39(5), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707303634
12.
de BoerN. (2019). Street-level enforcement style: A multidimensional measurement instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1465954
13.
de BoerN. (2021). The (un)intended effects of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement style: Do citizens shame or obey bureaucrats?Public Policy and Administration, 36(4), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720905005
de VriesM. S.KimP. S. (2011). Introduction to value and virtue in public administration. In De VriesM. S.KimP. S. (Eds.), Value and virtue in public administration: A comparative perspective (pp. 1–16). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230353886_1
16.
DobelJ. P. (2007). Public management as ethics. In FerlieE.LynnL. E.PollittC. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public management (pp. 156–181). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199226443.003.0008
DobelJ. P. (2018b). Public virtue and the ethical dimensions of leading. In JurkiewiczC. (Ed.), Radical thoughts on ethical leadership (pp. 21–46). Information Age Publishing.
19.
DowneJ.CowellR.MorganK. (2016). What determines ethical behavior in public organizations: Is it rules or leadership?Public Administration Review, 76(6), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12562
20.
DustS. B.ResickC. J.MargolisJ. A.MawritzM. B.GreenbaumR. L. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee success: Examining the roles of psychological empowerment and emotional exhaustion. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 570–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.02.002
21.
FarhJ.-L.EarleyP. C.LinS.-C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393733
22.
FarhJ.-L.ZhongC.-B.OrganD. W. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2), 241–253. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034728
23.
FarmerD. J. (1995). The language of public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity. University of Alabama Press.
24.
FehrR.YamK. C. (Sam)DangC. (2015). Moralized leadership: The construction and consequences of ethical leader perceptions. The Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0358
25.
FernandezS.MoldogazievT. (2011). Empowering public sector employees to improve performance: Does it work?The American Review of Public Administration, 41(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074009355943
26.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
27.
GofenA.LottaG. (2021). Street-level bureaucrats at the forefront of pandemic response: A comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1861421
28.
GreenleafR. K. (1991). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
29.
HairJ. F. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson Education.
30.
HassanS.ParkJ.RaadscheldersJ. C. N. (2019). Taking a closer look at the empowerment-performance relationship: Evidence from law enforcement organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12978
31.
HassanS.WrightB. E.YuklG. (2014). Does ethical leadership matter in government? Effects on organizational commitment, absenteeism, and willingness to report ethical problems. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12216
32.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2010). Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(4), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2010.498290
33.
HeresL. (2015). Ethical leadership research: Looking beyond the leader. In LawtonA.van der WalZ.HubertsL. (Eds.), Ethics in public policy and management: A global research companion (pp. 165–180). Routledge.
34.
HeresL.LasthuizenK. (2012). What’s the difference? Ethical leadership in public, hybrid and private sector organizations. Journal of Change Management, 12(4), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2012.728768
35.
HuiM. K.AuK.FockH. (2004). Empowerment effects across cultures. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 46–60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3875256
36.
JacobsR. M. (2018). Developing ethical competence: Some considerations regarding virtue, deliberation, intention, and guilt. Public Integrity, 20(5), S5–S17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2017.1405703
37.
JunJ. S. (2006). The social construction of public administration: Interpretive and critical perspectives. State University of New York Press.
38.
KanK.KuH. B. (2021). Serving the people, building the party: Social organizations and party work in China’s urban villages. The China Journal, 85, 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1086/711182
39.
KlijnE. H.de BoerN.EshuisJ. (2022). Leading frontline enforcers: How supervisors’ leadership style impacts inspectors’ enforcement style. Public Management Review, 24(3), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1833610
40.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
41.
KunduS. C.KumarS.GahlawatN. (2019). Empowering leadership and job performance: Mediating role of psychological empowerment. Management Research Review, 42(5), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-04-2018-0183
42.
LemoineG. J.HartnellC. A.LeroyH. (2019). Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 148–187. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0121
LoW.-H.FryxellG. E.Van RooijB. (2009). Changes in enforcement styles among environmental enforcement officials in China. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(11), 2706–2723. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41357
MacIntyreA. C. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.
47.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
48.
MiaoQ.NewmanA.SchwarzG.CooperB. (2018). How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12839
OrganD. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Com.
52.
PaesenH.WoutersK.MaesschalckJ. (2019). Servant leaders, ethical followers? The effect of servant leadership on employee deviance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(5), 624–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2019-0013
53.
ParkS. M.RaineyH. G. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in U.S. federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887954
54.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA.WiseL. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x
55.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
56.
PiccoloR. F.GreenbaumR.den HartogD. N.FolgerR. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.627
57.
PodsakoffN. P.WhitingS. W.PodsakoffP. M.BlumeB. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079
58.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
59.
PotipiroonW.FaermanS. (2016). What difference do ethical leaders make? Exploring the mediating role of interpersonal justice and the moderating role of public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 19(2), 171–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1141813
60.
PotipiroonW.FordM. T. (2017). Does public service motivation always lead to organizational commitment? Examining the moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and ethical leadership. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017717241
61.
PrestonN. (1992). Can virtue be regulated? An examination of the EARC proposals for a code of conduct for public officials in Queensland. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 51(4), 410–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1992.tb01087.x
62.
QingM.AsifM.HussainA.JameelA. (2020). Exploring the impact of ethical leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in public sector organizations: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 14(6), 1405–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00340-9
63.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12505
64.
SchottC.van KleefD. D.SteenT. (2015). What does it mean and imply to be public service motivated?The American Review of Public Administration, 45(6), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014533589
65.
ShakeelF.KruyenP. M.Van ThielS. (2020). Ethical leadership: A structured review into construct, measurement, public sector context and effects. International Journal of Public Leadership, 16(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-09-2019-0060
66.
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
67.
StewartD. W. (1991). Theoretical foundations of ethics in public administration: Approaches to understanding moral action. Administration & Society, 23(3), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979102300305
68.
StokerG. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance?The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583
69.
TaylorJ. (2013). Goal setting in the Australian public service: Effects on psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12040
70.
TholenB. (2011). Public virtue approaches. In De VriesM. S.KimP. S. (Eds.), Value and virtue in public administration: A comparative perspective (pp. 33–46). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230353886_3
TreviñoL. K.HartmanL. P.BrownM. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166057
73.
TummersL. L. G.BekkersV.VinkE.MushenoM. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056
74.
Van LoonN.KjeldsenA. M.AndersenL. B.VandenabeeleW.LeisinkP. (2018). Only when the societal impact potential is high? A panel study of the relationship between public service motivation and perceived performance. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16639111
75.
WalumbwaF. O.SchaubroeckJ. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275–1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015848
76.
WangX. (2015). Psychological empowerment of frontline police officers in response to social service role strain in China. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(3), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-015-9210-5
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
