Span of control may be a critical structural condition for ethical leadership. According to social learning theory, emulation and vicarious learning processes are mechanisms through which ethical leaders enhance ethical commitment among employees. However, if the span of control (number of employees per manager) is too wide, ethical leadership can be difficult to practice due to a more distant relationship between manager and employees. Using a mixed method design with survey data and interviews, we analyze the relationship between span of control and ethical leadership among doctors in Danish hospitals. Survey results from the study show no statistical association between span of control and clinical directors’ self-reported ethical leadership. Interviews with employees and managers support this finding by showing how ethical guidance unfolds through social exchange relationships where employees can act as moral professionals. This suggests that span of control is not a critical structural condition for intending and perceiving a high level of ethical leadership. Span of control is indirectly relevant through the perceived distance between manager and employees. The findings thus enhance our understanding of how ethical leadership takes place in complex, professionalized public organizations. This might inspire managers to lower the organizational power distance and promote professionalism.
BaiY.LinL.LuiJ. T. (2019). Leveraging the employee voice: A multi-level social learning perspective of ethical leadership. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(12), 1869–1901.
2.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Prentice-Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In KurtinesW. M.GewirtzJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 45–59). Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BelleN.CantarelliP. (2019). Do ethical leadership, visibility, external regulation, and prosocial impact affect unethical behavior? Evidence from a laboratory and a field experiment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 1–23.
6.
BroL. L. (2016). Small, large or rather medium-sized organizations? An investigation of the connection between span of control, leadership identity and the use of transformational leadership in Danish day care institutions. Politica, 48(2), 158–178.
7.
BrownM.MitchellM. (2010). Ethical and unethical leadership. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 583–616.
8.
BrownM.TreviñoL. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.
9.
BrownM.TreviñoL. (2014). Do role models matter? An investigation of role modeling as an antecedent of perceived ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 587–598.
10.
BrownM.TreviñoL.HarrisonD. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 117–134.
11.
BurauV.AndersenL. B. (2014). Professions and professionals: Capturing the changing role of expertise through theoretical triangulation. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 73(1), 264–293.
12.
CathcartD.JeskaS.KarnasJ.MillerS. E.PecheacekJ.LolitaR. (2004). Span of control matters. Journal of Nursing Administration, 34(9), 395–399.
13.
CogliserC.SchriesheimC. (2000). Exploring work unit context and leader-member exchange: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 487–511.
14.
CohenJ. J. (2006). Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: From evidence to accountability. Medical Education, 2006(40), 607–617.
15.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. L. P. (Eds.), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (pp. 53–105). SAGE.
De HooghA. H. B.Den HartogD. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 297–311.
18.
De HooghA. H. B.Den HartogD. N. (2009). Ethical leadership: The positive and responsible use of power. In TjosvoldD.WisseB. (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 338–354). Cambridge University Press.
Den HartogD. N. (2015). Ethical leadership. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 409–434.
21.
Den HartogD. N.BelschakF. D. (2012). Work engagement and machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 35–47.
22.
DoranD.McCutcheronA. S.EvansM. G.MacMillanK.HallL. M.PringleD.SmithS.ValenteA. (2004). Impact of the manager’s span of control on leadership and performance. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation.
23.
EisenbeissS. A.BrodbeckF. (2014). Ethical and unethical leadership: A cross-cultural and cross-sectoral analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 343–359.
24.
FaroukS.JabeenF. (2018). Ethical climate, corporate social responsibility and organizational performance: Evidence from the UAE public sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(4), 737–752.
25.
FournierV. (1999). The appeal to “professionalism” as a disciplinary mechanism. The Sociological Review, 47(2), 280–307.
26.
FreidsonE. (2001). Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
27.
GibsonD. (2004). Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 134–156.
28.
GittellJ. H. (2001). Supervisory span, relational coordination and flight departure performance: A reassessment of postbureaucracy theory. Organization Science, 12(4), 468–483.
29.
GreenS.AndersonS.ShiversS. (1996). Demographic and organizational influences on leader-member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(2), 203–214.
30.
GrønC. H.BroL. L.AndersenL. B. (2020). Public managers’ leadership identity: Concept, causes, and consequences. Public Management Review, 22(11), 1696–1716.
31.
GumusluogluL.Karakitapoğlu-AygünaZ.HirstG. (2013). Transformational leadership and R&D workers’ multiple commitments: Do justice and span of control matter?Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2269–2278.
32.
HannahS. T.AvolioB. J. (2010). Moral potency: Building the capacity for character-based leadership. Consulting Psychological Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 291–310.
33.
HauffS.RichterN. F. (2015). Power distance and its moderating role in the relationship between situational job characteristics and job satisfaction: An empirical analysis using different cultural measures. Cross Cultural Management, 22(1), 68–89.
34.
Hechanova-AlampayR.BeehrT. (2001). Empowerment, span of control, and safety performance in work teams after workforce reduction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(4), 275–282.
35.
HofstedeG. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Abridged version). SAGE.
36.
Holm-PetersenC.AndersenL. B.BjørnholtB.MortensenM. H.BroL. L.AndersenV. N. (2015). Span of control in the daycare area: Size, management style, quality management and well-being. VIVE.
37.
Holm-PetersenC.RieperO. (2013). When the Span of control grows. Managers’ experiences with the social and elderly areas [in Denmark]. KORA.
38.
HupeP.HillM. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85, 279–299.
39.
JacobsenC. B.AndersenL. B. (2015). Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 75, 829–841.
40.
JakobsenM.JensenR. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30.
41.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.BroL. L.BøllingtoftA.EriksenT. L. M.HoltenA.-L.JacobsenC. B.LadenburgJ.NielsenP. A.SalomonsenH. H.Westergård-NielsenN.WürtzA. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration & Society, 51(1), 3–33.
42.
KacmarK. M.BachrachD. G.HarrisK. J.ZivnuskaS. (2011). Fostering good citizenship through ethical leadership: The moderating role of gender and organizational politics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 633–642.
43.
KalshovenK.Den HartogD. N.De HooghA. H. B. (2011). Ethical leader behavior and Big Five factors of personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 349–366.
44.
KlausenK. K.MichelsenJ. (2004). The institutional manager—An examination of conditions for management in public institutions. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
45.
LiuJ.KwanH.FuP.MaoY. (2014). Ethical leadership and job performance in China: The roles of workplace friendships and traditionality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(4), 564–584.
46.
LuX.GuyM. E. (2014). How emotional labor and ethical leadership affect job engagement for Chinese public servants. Public Personnel Management, 43(1), 3–24.
47.
LucasV.LaschingerH. K. S.WongC. A. (2008). The impact of emotional intelligent leadership on staff nurse empowerment: The moderating effect of span of control. Journal of Nursing Management, 16(8), 964–973.
48.
MayerD. M.AquinoK.GreenbaumR. L.KuenziM. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151–171.
49.
MayerD. M.KuenziM.GreenbaumR.BardesM.SalvadorR. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 1–13.
50.
McCutcheonA. S.DoranD.EvansM.HallL. M.PringleD. (2009). Effects of leadership and span of control on nurses’ job satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Nursing Leadership, 22(3), 48–67.
51.
MeierK. J.BohteJ. (2000). Ode to Luther Gulick: Span of control and organizational performance. Administration & Society, 32(2), 115–137.
52.
MeierK. J.BohteJ. (2003). Span of control and public organizations: Implementing Luther Gulick’s research design. Public Administration Review, 63(1), 61–70.
53.
MoonK. K.JungC. (2018). Management representativeness, ethical leadership, and employee job satisfaction in the U.S. federal government. Public Personnel Management, 47(3), 265–286.
54.
MoonK. K.ParkJ. (2019). Leadership styles and turnover behavior in the U.S federal government: Does span of control matter?International Public Management Journal, 22(3), 417–443.
55.
NgT. W. H.FeldmanD. C. (2015). Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 948–965.
56.
NørgaardR. R. (2022). Ethical leadership understandings in public professional organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 26(3), 3–23.
57.
NørgaardR. R.HansenA. L. (2021). Public ethical leadership questionnaire (PELQ). Aarhus University.
58.
PedersenL. D.JacobsenC. B.HansenA. L. (2021, September7–10). Not too narrow, not too broad: Span of control, leadership behavior, and employee job satisfaction in public organizations [Working paper]. Presented at EGPA conference 2021, Brussels, Belgium.
59.
PiccoloR.ColquittJ. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 327–340.
60.
PorterL.McLaughlinG. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather?The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 559–576.
61.
PotipiroonW.FordM. T. (2017). Does public service motivation always lead to organizational commitment? Examining the moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and ethical leadership. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 211–238.
62.
ResickC.HargisM.ShaoP.DustS. (2013). Ethical leadership, moral equity judgments, and discretionary workplace behavior. Human Relations, 66(7), 951–972.
63.
RiggioR. E.ZhuW.ReinaC.MaroosisJ. A. (2010). Virtue-based measurement of ethical leadership: The leadership virtues questionnaire. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 235–250.
64.
RoeckK. D.FarooqO. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership: Investigating their interactive effect on employees’ socially responsible behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 923–939.
65.
SahaR.Shashi CerchioneR.SinghR.DahiyaR. (2020). Effect of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A systematic review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 409–429.
66.
SchaubroeckJ.LamS.ChaS. (2012). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1020–1030.
67.
SchriesheimC. A.CastroS. L.YammarinoF. J. (2000). Investigating contingencies: An examination of the impact of span of supervision and upward controllingness on leadermember exchange using traditional and multivariate within- and between-entities analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 659–677.
68.
StoryJ. S.YoussefC. M.LuthansF.BarbutoJ. E.BovairdJ. A. (2013). Contagion effect of global leaders’ positive psychological capital on followers: Does distance and quality of relationship matter?The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2534–2553.
69.
ThielC. E.HardyJ. H.PetersonD. R.WelshD. T.BonnerJ. M. (2018). Too many sheep in the flock? Span of control attenuates the influence of ethical leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1324–1334.
70.
ToorS.OforiG. (2009). Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 533–547.
71.
TreviñoL. K.BrownM.HartmanL. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5–37.
72.
TreviñoL. K.HartmanL.BrownM. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128–142.
73.
Van WartM. (2013). Administrative leadership theory: A reassessment after 10 years. Public Administration, 91(3), 521–543.
74.
WaldmanD.YammarinoF. (1999). CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 266–285.
75.
WalumbwaF. O.MayerD. M.WangP.WangH.WorkmanK.ChristensenA. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204–213.
76.
WalumbwaF. O.SchaubroeckJ. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275–1286.
77.
WangZ.XuH.LiuY. (2018). How does ethical leadership trickle down? Test of an integrative dual-process model. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 691–705.
78.
WeaverG.TreviñoL. K.AgleB. (2005). Somebody I look up to: Ethical role models in organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 34(4), 313–330.
79.
WoD. X. H.AmbroseM. L.SchminkeM. (2015). What drives trickle-down effects? A test of multiple mediation processes. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1848–1868.
80.
ZollerY. J.MuldoonJ. (2020). Journey of a concept: Span of control—the rise, the decline, and what is next?Journal of Management History, 26(4), 515–533.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
