Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-12
Predictors of Turnover Intention in U.S. Federal Government Workforce: Machine Learning Evidence That Perceived Comprehensive HR Practices Predict Turnover Intention
This study aims to identify important predictors of turnover intention and to characterize subgroups of U.S. federal employees at high risk for turnover intention. Data were drawn from the 2018 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS, unweighted N = 598,003), a nationally representative sample of U.S. federal employees. Machine learning Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analyses were conducted to predict turnover intention and accounted for sample weights. CART analyses identified six at-risk subgroups. Predictor importance scores showed job satisfaction was the strongest predictor of turnover intention, followed by satisfaction with organization, loyalty, accomplishment, involvement in decisions, likeness to job, satisfaction with promotion opportunities, skill development opportunities, organizational tenure, and pay satisfaction. Consequently, Human Resource (HR) departments should seek to implement comprehensive HR practices to enhance employees’ perceptions on job satisfaction, workplace environments and systems, and favorable organizational policies and supports and make tailored interventions for the at-risk subgroups.
BertelliA. M. (2007). Determinants of bureaucratic turnover intention: Evidence from the department of the treasury. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul003
2.
BrannonD.ZinnJ. S.MorV.DavisJ. (2002). An exploration of job, organizational, and environmental factors associated with high and low nursing assistant turnover. The Gerontologist, 42(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/42.2.159
3.
ChenX.HuangL.XieD.ZhaoQ. (2018). EGBMMDA: Extreme gradient boosting machine for MiRNA-disease association prediction. Cell Death & Disease, 9(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-017-0003-x
4.
ChiuC.-K.LinC.-P.TsaiY. H.HsiaoC.-Y. (2005). Modeling turnover intentions and their antecedents using the locus of control as a moderator: A case of customer service employees. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(4), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun010
5.
ChoY. J.LewisG. B. (2012). Turnover intention and turnover behavior: Implications for retaining federal employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X11408701
6.
ChoiS. (2009). Diversity in the US federal government: Diversity management and employee turnover in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 603–630. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun010
7.
ChoiS. (2011). Organizational justice and employee work attitudes: The federal case. American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010373275
8.
CohenG.BlakeR. S.GoodmanD. (2016). Does turnover intention matter? Evaluating the usefulness of turnover intention rate as a predictor of actual turnover rate. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(3), 240–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15581850
9.
CottonJ. L.TuttleJ. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4282625
10.
CurryD.McCarragherT.Dellmann-JenkinsM. (2005). Training, transfer, and turnover: Exploring the relationship among transfer of learning factors and staff retention in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(8), 931–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.12.008
11.
DaltonD. R.JohnsonJ. L.DailyC. M. (1999). On the use of “intent to.” variables in organizational research: An empirical and cautionary assessment. Human Relations, 52(10), 1337–1350. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905201006
12.
DurstS. L. (1999). Assessing the effect of family friendly programs on public organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(3), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9901900302
13.
EganT. M.YangB.BarlettK. R. (2004). The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1104
14.
ErtasN. (2015). Turnover intentions and work motivations of millennial employees in federal service. Public Personnel Management, 44(3), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026015588193
15.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
16.
GongY.ChangS. (2008). Institutional antecedents and performance consequences of employment security and career advancement practices: Evidence from the People’s Republic of China. Human Resource Management, 47(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20196
17.
GriffethR. W.HomP. W.GaertnerS. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implication for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305
18.
HapfelmeierA.HothornT.UlmK. (2012). Recursive partitioning on incomplete data using surrogate decisions and multiple imputation. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 56(6), 1552–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2011.09.024
19.
HastieT.TibshiraniR.FriedmanJ. H. (2009). The elements of statistical learning (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag.
20.
ItoJ. K. (2003). Career branding and mobility in the civil service: An empirical study. Public Personnel Management, 32(1), 1–21.
21.
KangI.-G.BichelmeyerB. A. (2019). Advancing the knowledge base toward a comprehensive model—Part 1: An empirically tested performance model. Performance Improvement, 58(8/9), 26–36. http://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21895
22.
KimS. (2005). Factors affecting state government information technology employee turnover intentions. American Review of Public Administration, 35(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004273150
23.
KimS. (2012). The impact of human resource management on state government IT employee turnover intentions. Public Personnel Management, 41(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004273150
24.
KimS. Y.FernandezS. (2017). Employee empowerment and turnover intention in the U.S. federal bureaucracy. American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015583712
25.
KoJ.HurS. (2013). The impacts of employee benefits, procedural justice, and managerial trustworthiness on work attitudes: Integrated understanding based on social exchange theory. Public Administration Review, 74(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12160
26.
LewisG. B. (1991). Turnover and the quiet crisis in the federal civil service. Public Administration Review, 51(2), 145–155. https://www.jstor.org/stable/977108
Liss-LevinsonR.BharthapudiK.LeiderJ. P.SellersK. (2015). Loving and leaving public health: Predictors of intentions to quit among state health agency workers. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 21(Suppl. 6), S91–S101. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000317
29.
LondonM.LarsenH. H.ThistedL. N. (1999). Relationships between feedback and self-development. Group & Organization Management, 24(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601199241002
30.
MaertzC. P.GriffethR. W.CampbellN. S.AllenD. G. (2007). The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1059–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.472
MoynihanD. P.LanduytN. (2008). Explaining turnover intention in state government: Examining the roles of gender, life cycle, and loyalty. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(2), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X08315771
33.
MundiaL. (2011). Social desirability, non-response bias and reliability in a long self-report measure: Illustrations from the MMPI-2 administered to Brunei student teachers. Educational Psychology, 31(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.545049
34.
Pink-HarperS. A.RauhausB. (2017). Examining the impact of federal employee wellness programs and employee resilience in the federal workplace. Journal of Health & Human Services Administration, 40(3), 353–387.
35.
PittsD.MarvelJ.FernandezS. (2011). So hard to say goodbye? Turnover intention among U.S. federal employees. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02414.x
36.
PorterL. W.SteersR. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80(2), 151–176. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0034829
37.
RubinE. V. (1973). The role of procedural justice in public personnel management: Empirical results from the department of defense. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum035
38.
SambasivanR.DasS. (2017, December). Big data regression using tree based segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE India Council International Conference, 3, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDICON.2017.8488137
39.
SmithB. D. (2005). Job retention in child welfare: Effects of perceived organizational support, supervisor support, and intrinsic job value. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.08.013
TerborgJ. R. (1981). Interactional psychology and research on human behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1981.4285691
WeaverT. L. (2015). Intent to exit: Why do US federal employees leave?International Journal of Public Administration, 38(6), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.949739
45.
WynenJ.Op de BeeckS. (2014). The impact of the financial and economic crisis on turnover intention in the U.S. federal government. Public Personnel Management, 43(4), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026014537043
46.
WynenJ.OpdeBeeckS.HondeghemA. (2013). Interorganizational mobility within the US federal government: Examining the effect of individual and organizational factors. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12113
47.
ZimmermanR. K.BalasubramaniG. K.NowalkM. P.EngH.UrbanskiL.JacksonM. L.… WisniewskiS. R. (2016). Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis to predict influenza in primary care patients. BMC Infectious Diseases, 16(1), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1839-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
