Contracting out has long been used in all levels of government in the United States, with federal contract spending increasing 8% to 9% annually since 2015. The literature on contracting out has examined the impact of this practice on the work-related attitudes and motivation of public employees who have transitioned to work for private contractors. However, we understand very little about the effects of contracting out on the overwhelming number of public employees who are not displaced. Given the importance of work-related attitudes and turnover for organizations, this study explores the potential consequences of contracting out for employee turnover intention over a period of several years. The results of panel data analyses suggest that an increase in contracting activity in federal agencies increases the employee turnover intention rate. Contracting out also impacts employee turnover intention indirectly through its influence on job satisfaction.
AgrestiA. (2013). Categorical data analysis. John Wiley.
2.
AliS. B. (2019). Politics, bureaucracy, and employee retention: Toward an integrated framework of turnover intent. Administration & Society, 51, 1486–1516.
3.
AlonsoJ. M.CliftonJ.Díaz-FuentesD. (2017). The impact of government outsourcing on public spending: Evidence from European Union countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39, 333–348.
4.
ApplebyP. H. (1945). Big democracy. Alfred A. Knopf.
5.
BattaglioR. P. (2009). Privatization and its challenges for human resource management in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29, 203–206.
6.
BelG.FagedaX.WarnerM. (2010). Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29, 553–577.
7.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (1981). Race and sex differences in quits by young workers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 34, 16–25.
8.
BlauG. (1993). Further exploring the relationship between job search and voluntary individual turnover. Personnel Psychology, 46, 313–330.
9.
BozemanB. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Georgetown University Press.
10.
BrownL. A.KelloughJ. A. (2020). Contracting and the bureaucratic representation of minorities and women: Examining evidence from federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40, 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18822051
11.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. M. (2006). Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. Public Administration Review, 66, 323–331.
12.
BrudneyJ. L.FernandezS.RyuJ. E.WrightD. S. (2005). Exploring and explaining contracting out: Patterns among the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 393–419.
13.
BrunjesB. M.KelloughJ. E. (2018). Representative bureaucracy and government contracting: A further examination of evidence from federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28, 519–534.
14.
CantarelliP.BelardinelliP.BelleN. (2016). A meta-analysis of job satisfaction correlates in the public administration literature. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36, 115–144.
15.
ChiK. S. (1993). Privatization in state government: Options for the future. State Trends and Forecasts, 2, 12–21.
16.
ChiK. S.JasperC. (1998). Private practices: A review of privatization in state government. Council of State Governments.
17.
CottonJ. L.TuttleJ. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 11, 55–70.
18.
CunhaR. C.CooperC. L. (2002). Does privatization affect corporate culture and employee wellbeing?Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 21–49.
19.
DattaD. K.GuthrieJ. P.BausilD.PandeyA. (2010). Causes and effects of employee downsizing: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 36, 281–348.
20.
DiefenbachT. (2009). New public management in public sector organizations: The dark side of managerialistic “enlightenment.”Public Administration, 87, 892–909.
21.
DonahueJ. D. (1989). The privatization decision: Public ends, private means. Basic Books.
22.
FelpsW.MitchellT. R.HekmanD. R.LeeT. W.HoltomB. C.HarmanW. S. (2009). Turnover contagion: How coworkers’ job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 545–561.
FernandezS.SmithC. R. (2006). Looking for evidence of public employee opposition to privatization: An empirical study with implications for practice. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 356–381.
25.
FernandezS.SmithC. R.WengerJ. B. (2007). Employment, privatization, and managerial choice: Does contracting out reduce public sector employment?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 57–77.
26.
FleckerJ.HermannC. (2011). The liberalization of public services: Company reactions and consequences for employment and working conditions. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32, 523–544.
27.
FredericksonG. H. (1997). Spirit of public administration. Jossey-Bass.
28.
FullerC. M.SimmeringM. J.AticG.AttincY.BabinB. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3192–3198.
29.
GanslerJ. S.LucyshynW. (2004). Competitive sourcing: What happens to federal employees?IBM Center for the Business of Government.
30.
GeorgeB.PandeyS. K. (2017). We know the yin—But where is the yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37, 245–270.
31.
GirthA. M.HefetzA.JohnstonJ. M.WarnerM. E. (2012). Outsourcing public service delivery: Management responses in noncompetitive markets. Public Administration Review, 72, 887–900.
32.
Government Business Council. (2015). Inside federal outsourcing—A candid survey of federal managers. Government Executive Media Group.
33.
GreeneJ. D. (1996). How much privatization? A research note examining the use of privatization by cities in 1982 and 1992. Policy Studies Journal, 24, 632–640.
34.
HodgeG. A. (2000). Privatization: An international review of performance. Westview Press.
35.
HurH.PerryJ. L. (2020). Job security rule changes and employee organizational commitment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 641–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19842622
36.
JakobsenM.JensenR. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18, 3–30.
37.
JudgeT. A.BonoJ. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—Self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—With job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.
38.
KelloughJ. E.LingoL. G. (2002). Pay for performance in Georgia state government: Employee perspectives on GeorgiaGain after 5 years. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22, 146–166.
39.
KelloughJ. E.NigroL. (2005). Dramatic reform in the public sector: At-will employment and the creation of a new public workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 447–466.
40.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.BolgerN. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233–265). McGraw Hill.
41.
KettlD. F. (1993). Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Brookings Institution.
42.
KimS.FernandezS. (2017). Employee empowerment and turnover intention in the U.S. federal bureaucracy. The American Review of Public Administration, 47, 4–22.
43.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
44.
LambertE. G.HorganN. L.BartonS. M. (2001). The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intention: A test of a structural measurement model using a national sample of workers. Social Science Journal, 38, 233–250.
45.
LeeG. R.LeeS. (2020). How outsourcing may enhance job satisfaction in the U.S. federal bureaucracy: Exploring the role of knowledge sharing. The American Review of Public Administration, 50, 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020913980
46.
LeeS. (2018). Employee turnover and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 48, 522–534.
47.
LeeS.FernandezS.ChangC. (2018). Job scarcity and voluntary turnover in the U.S. federal bureaucracy. Public Personnel Management, 47, 3–25.
48.
LindholstA. C.HansenM. B.RandrupT. B.PerssonB.KistofferssonA. (2018). The many outcomes from contracting out: The voice of public managers. Environmental and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36, 1046–1067.
49.
Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1997). Privatization in the United States. The RAND Journal of Economics, 28, 447–471.
50.
McKnightD. H.PhillipsB.HardgraveB. C. (2009). Which reduces IT turnover intention the most: Workplace characteristics or job characteristics?Information & Management, 46, 167–174.
51.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr. (2013). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 429–456.
52.
MilwardB. H. (1994). Implications of contracting out: New roles for the hollow state. In IngrahamP. W.RomzekB. (Eds.), New paradigm for government: Issues for the changing public service (pp. 41–62). Jossey-Bass.
53.
MobleyW. H.GriffethR. W.HandR. H.MeglinoB. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493–522.
54.
MoynihanD. P. (2008). The normative model in decline? Public service motivation in the age of governance. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 247–267). Oxford University Press.
55.
MuchinskyP. M.MorrowP. C. (1980). A multidisciplinary model of voluntary employee turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 263–290.
56.
NelsonA.CooperC. L.JacksonP. R. (1995). Uncertainty amidst change: The impact of privatization on employee job satisfaction and well-being. Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68, 57–71.
57.
OhY.ParkJ. (2011). New link between administrative reforms and job attitude: The role of interpersonal trust in peers as a mediator on organizational commitment. International Review of Public Administration, 16, 65–87.
58.
O’TooleL. J.MeierK. J. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: Implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 505–526.
59.
O’TooleL. J.MeierK. J. (2004). Parkinson’s law and the new public management? Contracting determinants and service-quality consequences in public education. Public Administration Review, 64, 342–352.
60.
PapkeL. E.WooldridgeJ. L. (2008). Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics, 145(1–2), 121–133.
61.
PegnatoJ. A. (2011). What is the right balance between outsourcing government work to the private sector versus performing the work in-house?Journal of Contract Management, 9, 91–102.
62.
PerryJ. L.VandenabeeleW. (2008). Behavioral dynamics: Institutions, identities, and self-regulation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 294–313). Oxford University Press.
63.
PetersenO. H.HjelmarU.VrangbækK. (2018). Is contracting out of public services still the great panacea? A systematic review of studies on economic and quality effects from 2000 to 2014. Social Policy & Administration, 52, 130–157.
64.
PittsD.MarvelJ.FernandezS. (2011). So hard to say goodbye? Turnover intention among U.S. federal employees. Public Administration Review, 71, 751–760.
65.
RaineyH. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations. Jossey-Bass.
66.
ReevesE.BarrowM. (2000). The impact of contracting out on the costs of refuse collection services: The case of Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 31, 120–150.
67.
RobinsonS. L.MorrisonE. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 289–298.
68.
RobinsonS. L.RousseauD. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 249–259.
69.
RousseauD. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389–400.
70.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 66–68.
71.
RyanT. A.SmithP. C. (1954). Principles of industrial psychology. Ronald Press.
72.
SavasE. S. (2000). Privatization: The key to better government. Chatham House.
73.
ScarpelloV.CampbellJ. P. (1983). Job satisfaction: Are all the parts there?Personnel Psychology, 36, 577–600.
74.
SchluchterM. D. (2008). Flexible approaches to computing mediated effects in generalized linear models: Generalized estimating equations and bootstrapping. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 268–288.
75.
SclarE. D. (2000). You don’t always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization. Cornell University.
76.
ShahP. P. (2000). Network destruction: The structural implications of downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 101–112.
77.
SiS.WeiF.LiY. (2008). The effect of organizational psychological contract violation on managers’ exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect in the Chinese context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 932–944.
78.
SmithP. C.KendallL. M.HulinC. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Rand McNally.
79.
SnavelyK.DesaiU. (2010). Competitive sourcing in the federal civil service. The American Review of Public Administration, 40, 83–99.
80.
SpectorP. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Sage.
81.
SpectorP. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.
82.
TerryL. D. (2006). The thinning of administrative institutions. In RosenbloomD. H.McCurdyH. E. (Eds.), Revisiting Waldo’s administrative state: Constancy and change in public administration (pp. 109–128). Georgetown University.
83.
TettR. P.MeyerJ. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 673–686.
84.
ThompsonF. J.RiccucciN. M. (1998). Reinventing government. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 231–257.
85.
TurnleyW. H.FeldmanD. C. (2000). Re-examining the effects of psychological contract violations: Unmet expectations and job dissatisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 25–42.
86.
Van SlykeD. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government- nonprofit social services contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 157–187.
87.
Van SlykeD. M. (2009). Collaboration and relational contacting. In O’LearyR.BinghamL. B. (Eds.), The collaborative public manager (pp. 173–156). Georgetown University.
88.
VrangbækK.PetersenO. H.HjelmarU. (2015). Is contracting out good or bad for employees? A review of international experience. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35, 3–23.
89.
WanousJ. P.ReichersA. E.HudyM. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252.
90.
YangK.KassekertA. (2010). Linking management reform with employee job satisfaction: Evidence from federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 413–436.
