Women govern differently and offer a distinct voice in the governing process yet remain significantly underrepresented among city managers and chief administrative officers. Despite decades of work to improve gender parity, women hold just 13% of chief local government positions according to the International City/County Managers Association (ICMA). One reason for this may be that women have different experiences and are socialized differently than men, as suggested by differing motivations, identities, and attitudes. Using a mixed-methods approach, we explore differences in the experiences and socialization of women and men that may contribute to the gender disparity in representation among city managers. Our study yields several significant findings that suggest women are mentored differently, develop different political attitudes over time, and develop confidence differently than their male counterparts. Contrary to prior research, we did not find significant differences in public service motivations by gender or year of service.
AguadoN. A.FredericksonH. G. (2012). Gender and careers in city management: A case study of the career paths of one department’s MPA graduates. Journal of Women, Politics, & Policy, 33(1), 25–37.
2.
AlkadryM.BishuS. G.AliS. B. (2019). Beyond representation: Gender, authority, and city managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(2), 300–319.
3.
BakerH. E.JenningsK. M. (2000). Limitations in “realistic recruiting” and subsequent socialization efforts: The case of Riddick Bowe and the United States Marine Corps. Public Personnel Management, 29(3), 367–378.
4.
BattaglioR. P.FrenchP. E. (2016). Public service motivation, public management reform, and organizational socialization: Testing the effects of employment at-will and agency on PSM among municipal employees. Public Personnel Management, 45(2), 123–147.
5.
BeatyL.DavisT. J. (2012). Gender disparity in professional city management: Making the case for enhancing leadership curriculum. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(4), 617–632.
6.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
7.
BlauP. (1960). Orientation toward clients in a public welfare agency. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5(3), 341–361.
8.
BrattonK.RayL. (2002). Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 428–437.
9.
BrewerG. A. (2008). Employee and organizational performance. In PerryJ. L.HondeghamA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 136–156). Oxford University Press.
10.
BrightL. (2005). Public employees with high levels of Public Service Motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25(2), 138–154.
11.
BurnsR. (1979). Women in municipal managements. Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics.
12.
BushC.KeyE.EskridgeR. (2016). Assessing the impact of city manager ideology on local expenditures. Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, 28(2), 196–121.
13.
CarliL.EaglyA. (2001). Gender, hierarchy, and leadership: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 629–636.
14.
CechE.RubineauB.SilbeyS.SeronC. (2011). Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 641–666.
15.
ChanK. Y.DrasgowF. (2001). Toward a theory of individual difference and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology86(3), 481–498.
16.
ChoiY.ChungI. H. (2017). Attraction-selection and socialization of work values: Evidence from longitudinal survey. Public Personnel Management, 46(1), 66–88.
17.
DayD. V.HarrisonM.HalpinS. (2009). An integrative approach to leader development: Connecting adult development, identity, and expertise. Psychology Press.
18.
DeHart-DavisD.MarloweJ.PandeyS. (2006). Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 873–887.
19.
DenhardtR. B. (1968). Bureaucratic socialization and organizational accommodation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(3), 441–450.
20.
DenhardtR. B. (2001). The big questions of public administration education. Public Administration Review, 61(5), 526–534.
21.
DolanJ. (2002). Representative bureaucracy in the federal executive: Gender and spending priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(3), 353–375.
22.
DolanK.FordL. (1995). Women in state legislatures: Feminist identity and legislative behaviors. American Politics Quarterly, 23(1), 96–108.
23.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business School Press.
24.
EaglyA. H.Johannessen-SchmidtM. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797.
25.
FeldmanD. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 309–318.
26.
FerreiraF. V.GyourkoG. (2011). Does gender matter for political leadership? The case of US mayors. Journal of Public Economics, 112, 24–39.
27.
FordL. (2011). Women and politics: The pursuit of equality (3rd ed.). Wadsworth.
28.
FoxR. L.SchuhmannR. A. (1999). Gender and local government: A comparison of women and men city managers. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 231–242.
29.
FoxR. L.SchuhmannR. A. (2000). Gender and the role of the city manager. Social Science Quarterly, 81(2), 604–621.
30.
FreseM. (1982). Occupational socialization and psychological development: An underemphasized research perspective in industrial psychology. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55(3), 209–224.
31.
FreseM.WolfgangK.SooseA.ZempelJ. (1996). Personal differences at work: Differences between East and West Germany. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37–63.
32.
GidengilE.VengroffR. (2008). Representative bureaucracy, tokenism and the glass ceiling: The case of women in Quebec municipal administration. Canadian Public Administration, 40(3), 457–480.
33.
Gomez-MejiaL. (1983). Sex differences during occupational socialization. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(3), 492–499.
34.
GuyM. E.NewmanM. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289–298.
35.
HamidullahM.RiccucciN.PandeyS. K. (2015). Women in city hall: Gender dimensions of managerial values. American Review of Public Administration, 45(3), 247–262.
36.
HolmanM. (2015). Women in politics in the American City. Temple University Press.
37.
HolmanM. (2017). Women in local government: What we know and where we go from here. State and Local Government Review, 49(4), 285–296.
38.
HsiungT. L.HsiehA. T. (2003). Newcomer socialization: The role of job standardization. Public Personnel Management, 32(4), 579–589.
39.
IbarraH. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764–791.
40.
International City/County Management Association. (2010). Directories: Municipal officials. The Municipal Yearbook, 2010, 181–274.
41.
International City/County Management Association. (2015). Women leading government: Why so little progress in 30 years?
42.
International City/County Management Association. (2017). Shattering the glass ceilings Miami style.
43.
JacobsonW. S.PalusC. K.BowlingC. (2010). A woman’s touch? Gendered management and performance in state administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 477–504.
44.
JaskyteK. (2005). The impact of organizational socialization tactics on role ambiguity and role conflict of newly hired social workers. Administration in Social Work, 29(4), 69–87.
45.
JaskyteK.LeeM. (2009). Organizational commitment of social workers: An exploratory study. Administration in Social Work, 33(3), 227–241.
46.
JonesG. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustment to organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 262–279.
47.
JunJ. (2006). The social construction of public administration: Interpretive and critical perspectives. State University of New York Press.
48.
KelloggL.GourrierA.BernickE. L.BrekkenK. (2017). County governing boards: Where are all the women?Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(1), 39–51.
49.
KimS.VandenabeeleW.WrightB.AndersenL.CeraseF.ChristensenR.DesmaraisC.KoumentaM.LeisinkP.LiuB.PalidauskaiteJ.PedersenL.PerryJ.RitzA.TaylorJ.De VivoP. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102.
50.
KingC. S. (2000). Sex-role identity and decision styles: How gender helps explain the paucity of women at the top. In Duerst-LahtiG.KellyR. M. (Eds.), Gender power, leadership and governance (pp. 67–92). University of Michigan Press.
51.
KjeldsenA. M. (2012). Vocational study and public service motivation: Disentangling the socializing effects of higher education. International Public Management Journal, 15(4), 500–524.
52.
KjeldsenA. M.JacobsenC. B. (2012). Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization?Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 13(4), 899–926.
53.
KleinH.HeuserA. (2008), The learning of socialization content: A framework for researching orientating practices. In MartocchioJ. (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 27), (pp. 279-336). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
54.
LordR. G.HallR. J. (2005). Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skill. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 591–615.
55.
LouisM. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226–251.
56.
MarantoR.TeodoroM. P.CarrollK.ChengA. (2019). Gendered ambition: Men’s and women’s career advancement in public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 49, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018804564
57.
MeierK. J.MastracciS.WilsonK. (2006). Emotional labor and its link to performance. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 899–909.
58.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL.GoerdelH. (2006). Management activity and program performance: Gender as management capital. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 24–36.
59.
MoynihanD.PandeyS. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review67(1), 40–53.
60.
MoysonS.RaaphorstN.GroeneveldS.Van de WalleS. (2017). Organizational socialization in public administration research: A systematic review and directions for future research. American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 610–627.
61.
National Research Center, (2013). ICMA Task Force on Women. Retrieved from International City/County Management Association.
62.
OberfieldZ. W. (2014). Becoming bureaucrats: Socialization at the front lines of government service. University of Pennsylvania Press.
63.
PajaresF. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 116–125.
64.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
65.
PerryJ. (1997). Antecedents of Public Service Motivation. Journal of Public Administration Theory & Research7(2): 181–197.
66.
PerryJ. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 681–690.
67.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA.WiseL. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690.
68.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.
69.
PowellG.PosnerB.SchmidtW. (1984). Sex effects on managerial value systems. Human Relations, 37(11), 909–921.
70.
SabharwalM. (2015). From glass ceilings to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 399–426.
71.
ScottP.PandeyS. (2005). Red tape and public service motivation: Findings from a National Survey of Managers in State Health and Human Services Agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration25(2):155–180.
72.
SeldenS.SowaJ. (2015). Voluntary turnover in nonprofit human service organizations: The impact of high performance work practices. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(3), 182–207.
73.
SmithA. (2015). On the edge of a glass cliff: women in leadership in public organizations. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 484–517.
74.
SmithA.HatmakerD. (2014). Knowing, doing, and becoming: Professional identity construction among public affairs doctoral students. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(4), 545–564.
75.
StewartD. W. (1980). Women in local politics. The Scarecrow Press.
76.
StiversC. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state (2nd ed.). Sage.
77.
StoutM. (2009). Enhancing professional socialization through the metaphor of tradition. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(3), 289–316.
78.
TerborgJ. (1977). Women in management: A research review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(6), 647–664.
79.
VandenabeeleW. (2011). Who wants to deliver public service? Do institutional antecedents of public service motivation provide an answer?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 87–107.
80.
VoorheesH.EarlJ. (2017). The confidence gap. Is it holding women back? The International City County Management Association.
81.
WeikartL.ChenG.WilliamsD.HromicH. (2006). The democratic sex: Gender differences and the exercise of power. Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy, 28(1), 119–140.
82.
YorkR. (1988). Sex-role stereotypes and the socialization of managers. Administration in Social Work, 12(1), 25–40.
