Over the past couple of decades the interest in flexible work arrangements has increased. This study conducted a longitudinal analysis of the effects of telework on the reduction of employee voluntary turnover. The agency-level data extracted from Office of Personnel Management’s congressional reports and central personnel data files were analyzed. The results show that agencies with more teleworkers reported less voluntary turnover. Agencies that are more supportive of employees’ teleworking also reported lower voluntary turnover. Organizational characteristics including average pay and length of service, and the proportions of different occupational categories, full-time employment, and women also turned out to have significant effects on voluntary turnover of employees.
AllenD.ShanockL. (2013). Perceived organizational support and embeddedness as key mechanisms connecting socialization tactics to commitment and turnover among new employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 350-369.
2.
BaeK.KimD. (2016). The impact of decoupling of telework on job satisfaction in US federal agencies: Does gender matter?The American Review of Public Administration, 46, 356-371.
3.
BaileyD.KurlandN. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383-400.
4.
BaltagiB. (2013). Econometric analysis of panel data (5th ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
5.
BaltesB.BriggsT.HuffJ.WrightJ.NeumanG. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 496-513.
6.
BanC. (2012). Hiring in the federal government: Balancing technical, managerial, and political imperatives. In RiccucciN. M. (Ed.), Public personnel management: Current concerns, future challenges (pp. 135-1156). New York, NY: Longman.
7.
BaruchY. (2001). The status of research on teleworking and an agenda for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 113-129.
8.
BaruchY.NicholsonN. (1997). Home, sweet work: Requirements for effective home-working. Journal of General Management, 23(2), 15-30.
9.
BaumeisterR.LearyM. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
10.
BlauF.KhanL. (1981). Race and sex differences in quits by young workers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 34, 563-577.
11.
BondJ.ThompsonC.GalinskyE.ProttasD. (2002). Highlights of the national study of the changing workforce: Executive summary. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.
12.
CaillierJ. (2013). Are teleworkers less likely to report leave intentions in the United States federal government than non-teleworkers are?American Review of Public Administration, 43, 72-88.
13.
CaillierJ. (2018). Do flexible work schedules reduce turnover in U.S. federal agencies?The Social Science Journal, 55, 108-115
14.
ChanD. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
15.
ChoiS. (2018). Managing flexible work arrangements in government: Testing the effects of institutional and managerial support. Public Personnel Management, 47, 26-50.
16.
ClearF.DicksonK. (2005). Teleworking practice in small and medium-sized firms: Management style and worker autonomy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20, 218-233.
17.
CooperC.KurlandN. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 511-532.
18.
CottonJ.TuttleJ. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 11, 55-70.
19.
DahlstromA. (2013) Argument structure of quirky Algonquian verbs. In KingT. H.de PaivaV. (Eds.), From quirky case to representing space: Papers in honor of Annie Zaenen (pp. 61-71). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
20.
de VriesH.TummersL.BekkersV. (2018). The benefits of teleworking in the public sector: Reality or rhetoric?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39, 570-593. doi:10.1177/0734371X18760124
21.
Di MartinoV.WirthL. (1990). Telework: A new way of working and living. International Labor Review, 129, 529-554.
22.
DuffyM.GansterD.PagonM. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331-351.
23.
DuxburyL.HigginsC.NeufeldD. (1998). Telework and the balance between work and family: Is telework part of the problem or part of the solution? In IgbariaM.TanM. (Eds.), The virtual workplace (pp. 218-255). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
24.
EzraM.DeckmanM. (1996). Balancing work and family responsibilities: Flextime and child care in the federal government. Public Administration Review, 56, 174-179.
25.
GajendranR.HarrisonD. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524-1541.
GoldenT.VeigaJ.DinoR. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter?Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1412-1421.
28.
GreenD.RobertsG. (2010). Personnel implications of public sector virtual organizations. Public Personnel Management, 39, 47-57.
29.
GreerT.PayneS. (2014). Overcoming telework challenges: Outcomes of successful telework strategies. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 17, 87-111.
30.
GriffethR.HomP.GaertnerS. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463-488.
31.
GuimaraesT.DallowP. (1999). Empirically testing the benefits, problems, and success factors for telecommuting programmes. European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 40-54.
32.
HobfollS. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.
33.
HuwsU. (1993). Teleworking in Britain (Employment Department Research Series 18). London, England: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
34.
JohnstonJ.DiNardoJ. (1997). Econometric methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
35.
KelliherC.AndersonD. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63, 83-106.
36.
KelloughJ. E.OsunaW. (1995). Cross-agency comparisons of quit rates in the federal service. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 15, 58-68.
37.
KonradA.MangelR. (2000). The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1225-1237.
38.
KurlandN.EaganT. (1999). Telecommuting: Justice and control in the virtual organization. Organization Science, 10, 1-31.
39.
KwonM.JeonS. (2017). Why permit telework? Determinants of California city governments’ decisions to permit telework. Public Personnel Management, 46, 239-262.
40.
LeeD.KimS. (2016). A quasi-experimental examination of telework eligibility and participation in the U.S. federal government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38, 451-471. doi:10.1177/0734371X16680269
41.
LewisG. (1991). Turnover and the quiet crisis in the federal civil service. Public Administration Review, 51, 145-155.
42.
LewisG.ParkK. (1989). Turnover rates in federal white-collar employment: Are women more likely to quit than men?American Review of Public Administration, 19(1), 13-28.
43.
LewisS.CooperC. (1995). Balancing the work/home interface: A European perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 5, 289-305.
44.
MahlerJ. (2012). The telework divide: Managerial and personnel challenges of telework. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 407-418.
45.
MartinB.MacDonnellR. (2012). Is telework effective for organizations? A meta-analysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Research Review, 35, 602-616.
46.
McNallL.MasudaA.NicklinJ. (2010). A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work-family enrichment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 381-396.
47.
MenardS. (2002). Longitudinal research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
48.
MierloH.VermuntJ.RutteC. (2008). Composing group-level constructs from individual-level survey data. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 368-392.
49.
MobleyW.HomerS.HollingsworthA. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 408-414.
50.
MowdayR.PorterL.SteersR. (1982). Organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York, NY: Academic Press.
51.
MoynihanD.LanduytN. (2008). Explaining turnover intention in state government: Examining the roles of gender, life cycle, and loyalty. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 120-143.
52.
NillesJ. (1976). Telecomunications-transportation tradeoff: Options for tomorrow. New York, NY: Wiley.
53.
OberfieldZ. (2014). Accounting for time: Comparing temporal and atemporal analyses of the business case for diversity management. Public Administration Review, 74, 777-789.
54.
PeiperlM.BaruchY. (1997). Back to square zero: The post-corporate career. Organization Dynamics, 25(4), 7-22.
55.
Perry-SmithJ.BlumT. (2000). Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1107-1117.
56.
PriceJ. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
57.
PughD.DietzJ. (2008). Employee engagement at the organizational level of analysis. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 44-47.
58.
RhoadesL.EisenbergerR. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
59.
RousseauD. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
RoyaltyA. (1998). Job-to-job and job-to-nonemployment turnover by gender and education level. Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 392-443.
61.
SaltzsteinA.TingY.SaltzsteinG. (2001). Work-family balance and job satisfaction: The impact of family friendly policies on attitudes of federal government employees. Public Administration Review, 61, 452-467.
62.
ScanduraT.LankauM. (1997). Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 377-391.
63.
SeldenS.MoynihanD. (2000). A model of voluntary turnover in state government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(2), 63-74.
64.
ShockleyK.AllenT. (2007). When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 479-493.
65.
StandenP. (2000). The home/work interface. In DanielsK.LamondD.StandenP. (Eds.), Managing telework (pp. 83-92). London, England: Business Press.
66.
StavrouE. (2005). Flexible work bundles and organizational competitiveness: A cross-national study of the European work context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 923-947.
67.
StavrouE.KilaniotisC. (2010). Flexible work and turnover: An empirical investigation across cultures. British Journal of Management, 21, 541-554.
68.
SteelR.OvalleN. (1984). A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 673-686.
69.
TaskinL.EdwardsP. (2007). The possibilities and limits of telework in a bureaucratic environment: Lessons from the public sector. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22, 195-207.
70.
TaylorD.KavanaughJ. (2005). Developing a model of leadership in the teleworking environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 9, 73-95.
WeinertC.MaierC.LaumerS. (2015). Do we behave based on our implicit attitudes? Proposing a research model and an experimental study to investigate their influence on behavioral intentions (ECIS 2015 Research-in-Progress Papers, Paper 9). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3412/02199cb452849471f896be57de1ce6b8fa8b.pdf
78.
WrightT.CropanzanoR. (1998). Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 486-493.
79.
YoonJ.LawlerE. (2006). Relational cohesion model of organizational commitment. In KyriakidouO.OzbilginM. (Eds.), Relational perspectives in organizational studies (pp. 138-162). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
