Previous research on gender-based inequality in public-sector state-level bureaucracies finds evidence of glass ceilings and glass walls; however, previous research does not evaluate these factors together, nor does this research extend beyond the late 1990s. This study uses newly available data from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)—data spanning from 1995 to 2015 that include the entire universe of female and male administrators—to evaluate this research question: Are gender-based pay disparities and glass walls among administrators in state-level bureaucracies related to the policy/program missions of state agencies? This study observes administrative-level gender-based pay disparities in all state agency types. Furthermore, this study finds evidence of occupational segregation or glass walls in distributive and regulatory agencies, but not in redistributive agencies. The findings indicate some progress for women; however, as recently as 2015, U.S. state bureaucracies, on average, did not achieve gender equity among their administrative ranks.
AlkadryM. G.TowerL. E. (2006). Unequal pay: The role of gender. Public Administration Review, 66, 888-898.
2.
AlkadryM. G.TowerL. E. (2011). Covert pay discrimination: How authority predicts pay differences between women and men. Public Administration Review, 7, 740-750.
BishuS. G.AlkadryM. G. (2017). A systematic review of the gender pay gap and factors that predict it. Administration & Society, 49, 65-104.
5.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (2006). The U.S. gender pay gap in the 1990s: Slowing convergence. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60, 54-66.
6.
BullardA.WrightD. S. (1993). Circumventing the glass ceiling: Women executives in American state governments. Public Administration Review, 53, 189-202.
7.
ChoiS. (2015). Pay equity in government: Analyzing determinants of gender pay disparity in the U.S. federal government. Administration & Society, 50, 346-371.
8.
ConnellR. (2006). Glass ceilings or gendered institutions? Mapping the gender regimes of public sector worksites. Public Administration Review, 66, 837-849.
9.
CorsonJ. J.PaulR. S. (1966). Men near the top. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
DeyJ.HillC. (2007). Behind the pay gap. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
11.
GuyM. (2017). Mom work versus dad work in local government. Administration & Society, 49, 48-64.
HuntV. H.RuckerL.KerrB. (2019). Reconsidering sex-based occupational segregation and agency missions: An analysis of U.S. State Bureaucracies (1987-2015) using two different thresholds. Administration & Society, 52, 431-465. doi:10.1177/0095399719836741
14.
JohnsonB. J.Crum-CanoB. D. (2011). Glass walls in urban planning: An examination of policy type and gender segregation within a profession. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31, 386-409.
15.
KerrB.MillerW.ReidM. (2002). Sex-based occupational segregation in U.S. state bureaucracies, 1987-97. Public Administration Review, 62, 412-423.
16.
KingsleyJ. D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy: An interpretation of the British civil service. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch.
17.
LewisG. B.BoydJ.PathakR. (2018). Progress toward pay equity in state governments?Public Administrative Review, 78, 386-397.
18.
LewisG. B.EmmertM. A. (1986). The sexual division of labor in federal employment. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 143-156.
19.
LewisG. B.NiceD. (1994). Race, sex, and occupational segregation in state and local governments. American Review of Public Administration, 24, 393-410.
20.
LlorensJ. J.KelloughJ. E.WengerJ. B. (2008). Choosing public sector employment: The impact of wages on the representation of women and minorities in state bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 397-413.
21.
LowiT. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16, 677-715.
22.
LowiT. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298-310.
23.
LowiT. J. (1985). The state in politics: The relation between policy and administration. In NollR. (Ed.), Regulatory policy and the social sciences (pp. 67-104). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
MillerW.KerrB.ReidM. (1999). A national study of gender-based occupational segregation in municipal bureaucracies: Persistence of glass walls?Public Administration Review, 59, 218-230.
25.
NewmanM. A. (1994). Gender and Lowi’s thesis: Implications for career advancement. Public Administration Review, 54, 277-284.
26.
ReidM. F.KerrJ. B.MillerW. (2000). A study of the advancement of women in municipal government bureaucracies: Persistence of glass ceilings?Women and Politics, 21, 35-53.
27.
ReidM. F.KerrJ. B.MillerW. (2003). Glass walls and glass ceilings: Women’s representation in state and municipal bureaucracies. New York, NY: Praeger.
28.
ReidM. F.MillerW.KerrJ. B. (2004). Sex-based glass ceilings in U.S. state-level bureaucracies, 1987-1997. Administration & Society, 36, 377-405.
29.
ReskinB.RoosP. A. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
30.
RiccucciN. M. (1986). Female and minority employment in city government: The role of unions. Policy Studies Journal, 15, 3-16.
31.
SmithA. E.MonaghanK. R. (2013). Some ceilings have more cracks: Representative bureaucracy in federal regulatory agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 50-71.
32.
SneedB. G. (2007). Glass walls in state bureaucracies: Examining the difference departmental function can make. Public Administration Review, 67, 880-891.
United States Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups 2017 (NCES 2017-051): Degrees Awarded. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/indicator_ree.asp
36.
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Instruction booklet, form 164, state and local government information (EEO-4). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
37.
WalkerS. (1985). Racial minority and female employment in policing: The implications of glacial change. Crime & Delinquency, 31, 555-572.
38.
WarnerR.SteelB.LovrichN. (1989). Conditions associated with the advent of representative bureaucracy: The case of policing. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 562-578.
