Regular salary equity studies can be a best practice among employers committed to salary equity and fairly managed compensation. While a well-constructed salary study can identify inequities for amelioration, a poorly constructed study can create rather than solve problems. Organizations may be deterred from doing these studies because of their inherent analytical challenges. We provide a guide for human resource managers describing how to conduct their own salary studies, how to interpret the results, and how organizations can apply the results. We describe best practices across public sector organizations and illustrate them with an example from higher education. We also provide a link to an online appendix containing sample code that can be used to conduct such analyses using two popular software packages. The twin goals of the article are to increase the quality of salary analyses while reducing the barriers to conducting them.
AlkadryM. G.BishuS. G.AliS. B. (2017). Beyond representation: Gender, authority, and city managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration. doi:10.1177/0734371X17718030
2.
AlkadryM. G.TowerL. E. (2006). Unequal pay: The role of gender. Public Administration Review, 66, 888-898. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00656.x
3.
ArulampalamW.BoothA. L.BryanM. L. (2007). Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gap across the wage distribution. ILR Review, 60, 163-186. doi:10.1177/001979390706000201
4.
BacolodM. P.BlumB. S. (2010). Two sides of the same coin: US “residual” inequality and the gender gap. Journal of Human Resources, 45, 197-242. doi:10.3368/jhr.45.1.197
5.
BarbezatD. A. (2004). A loyalty tax? National measures of academic salary compression. Research in Higher Education, 45, 761-776. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000044230.25883.46
6.
BidwellM. (2011). Paying more to get less. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 369-407. doi:10.1177/0001839211433562
7.
BinderM.KrauseK.ChermakJ.ThacherJ.GilroyJ. (2010). Same work, different pay? Evidence from a US public university. Feminist Economics, 16, 105-135. doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.530605
8.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55, 789-865. doi:10.1257/jel.20160995
9.
BradleyS.GreenC.ManganJ. (2015). Gender wage gaps within a public sector: Evidence from personnel data. The Manchester School, 83, 379-397. doi:10.1111/manc.12061
10.
CarlinP. S.KiddM. P.RooneyP. M.DentonB. (2013). Academic wage structure by gender: The roles of peer review, performance, and market forces. Southern Economic Journal, 80, 127-146. doi:10.4284/0038-4038-2010.267
FairweatherJ. S. (2005). Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 401-422. doi:10.1080/00221546.2005.11772290
13.
FeeneyM. K.RaineyH. G. (2010). Personnel flexibility and red tape in public and nonprofit organizations: Distinctions due to institutional and political accountability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 801-826. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup027
14.
GintherD. K. (2003). Is MIT an exception? Gender pay differences in academic science. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 23, 21-26. doi:10.1177/0270467602239767
15.
GintherD. K. (2004). Why women earn less: Economic explanations for the gender salary gap in science. AWIS Magazine, 33, 1-5.
16.
GintherD. K.HayesK. J. (2003). Gender differences in salary and promotion for faculty in the humanities 1977-1995. The Journal of Human Resources, 38, 34-73. doi:10.3368/jhr.XXXVIII.1.34
17.
GloverD.PallaisA.ParienteW. (2017). Discrimination as a self-fulfilling prophecy: Evidence from French grocery stores. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132, 1219-1260. doi:10.1093/qje/qjx006
18.
HaignereL. (2002). Paychecks: A guide to conducting salary-equity studies for higher education faculty. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.
19.
HerzogS. (2008). A four-step faculty compensation model: From equity analysis to adjustment. New Directions for Institutional Research, 140, 49-64. doi:10.1002/ir.269
20.
HoA. K.ThomsenL.SidaniusJ. (2009). Perceived academic competence and overall job evaluations: Students’ evaluations of African American and European American professors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 389-406. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00443.x
21.
HobbsB. K.WeeksS. H.FinchH. J. (2005). Estimating the mark-to-market premium required to fill vacant business school faculty lines: The case of finance. Journal of Education for Business, 80, 253-258. doi:10.3200/JOEB.80.5.253-258
22.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ. L.ThalerR. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193-206. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193
23.
KenyonG. L. (1997). Gender and income among Ontario social workers: The source of disparity. Canadian Social Work Review, 14, 155-166.
24.
KenyonG. L. (2003). Why does he always get to be the boy? Examining the gender income gap in social work. Canadian Social Work Review, 20, 185-202.
25.
LangbeinL. I.LewisG. B. (1998). Pay, productivity, and the public sector: The case of electrical engineers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 391-412. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024389
26.
LawlerI. I. I. (1990). Strategic pay: Aligning organizational strategies and pay systems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
LewisG. B. (1997). Race, sex, and performance ratings in the federal service. Public Administration Review, 57, 479-489. doi:10.2307/976959
28.
LewisG. B. (2018). Diversity, pay equity, and pay in social work and other professions. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 33, 286-299. doi:10.1177/0886109917747615
29.
LewisG. B.BoydJ.PathakR. (2018). Progress toward pay equity in state governments?Public Administration Review, 78, 386-397. doi:10.1111/puar.12897
30.
LewisG. B.PathakR.GallowayC. S. (2018). Trends in public–private pay parity in state and local governments. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38, 303-331.
31.
MasakureO. (2016). The effect of employee loyalty on wages. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 274-298. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2016.08.003
32.
MeierK. J.WilkinsV. M. (2002). Gender differences in agency head salaries: The case of public education. Public Administration Review, 62, 405-411. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00194
33.
MincerJ. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings (Human Behavior & Social Institutions No. 2). New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research.
34.
PudneyS.ShieldsM. (2000). Gender, race, pay and promotion in the British nursing profession: Estimation of a generalized ordered probit model. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 367-399.
35.
RabovskyT.LeeH. (2017). Exploring the antecedents of the gender pay gap in U.S. higher education. Public Administration Review, 78, 375-385. doi:10.1111/puar.12827
36.
RaineyH. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations (5th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
37.
ReeseC. C.WarnerB. (2012). Pay equity in the states. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 312-331. doi:10.1177/0734371X11428616
38.
RenzulliL. A.ReynoldsJ.KellyK.GrantL. (2013). Pathways to gender inequality in faculty pay: The impact of institution, academic division, and rank. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 34, 58-72. doi:/10.1016/j.rssm.2013.08.004
39.
SmartJ. C. (1991). Gender equity in academic rank and salary. The Review of Higher Education, 14, 511-525. doi:10.1353/rhe.1991.0011
40.
SmithR. A. (2012). Money, benefits, and power: A test of the glass ceiling and glass escalator hypotheses. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 639, 149-172. doi:10.1177/0002716211422038
41.
SneedB. G. (2007). Glass walls in state bureaucracies: Examining the difference departmental function can make. Public Administration Review, 67, 880-891. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00775.x
42.
TaylorL. L. (2015). When equality is not equity: Regional cost differences and the real allocation of educational resources. In NormoreA. H.EhrensalP. A. L.FirstP. F.TorresM. S. (Eds.), Legal frontiers in education: Complex law issues for leaders, policymakers and policy implementers (pp. 247-266). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
43.
ThompsonJ. R. (2007). Designing and implementing performance-oriented payband systems. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
44.
United States Office of Personnel Management. (2014). Governmentwide strategy on advancing pay equality in the federal government (ES/PL/PA-2014-05). Washington, DC: United States Office of Personnel Management.
45.
WebberK. L.González CanchéM. (2015). Not equal for all: Gender and race differences in salary for doctoral degree recipients. Research in Higher Education, 56, 645-672. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9369-8
