Organizational and societal mechanisms that ensure whistle-blowing in the public sector are required. Although many studies have explored a set of whistle-blowing determinants, few have explored the relationship and role of individual and attitudinal factors in influencing whistle-blowing in the public sector. To close this gap, this study considers the theoretical lenses of social exchange and self-determination theories, proposing that trustful leadership and organizational justice are the most likely factors to predict whistle-blowing intention when it is mediated by public service motivation (PSM) and extrinsic motivation. Using the Merit Principles Survey 2010 by the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, the study tests a partial mediation model employing structural equation modeling. The results suggest that PSM and extrinsic motivation partially mediate the relationship of trust in leadership and organizational justice and whistle-blowing intention. Finally, the study’s limitations and theoretical, empirical, and practical implications, as well as directions for future research, are discussed.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
AmbroseM. L.SeabrightM. A.SchminkeM. (2002). Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 947-965.
BassB. M.RiggioR. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BhalK. T.DadhichA. (2011). Impact of ethical leadership and leader-member exchange on whistle-blowing: The moderating impact of the moral intensity of the issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 485-496.
6.
BottomW. P.HollowayJ.MillerG. J.MislinA.WhitfordA. (2006). Building a pathway to cooperation: Negotiation and social exchange between principal and agent. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 29-58.
7.
BrewerG. A.Coleman SeldenS. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 413-439.
8.
BrewerG. A.RitzA.VandenabeeleW. (2012). Introduction to a symposium on public service motivation: An international sampling of research. International Journal of Public Administration, 35, 1-4.
9.
CaillierJ. G. (2015). Transformational leadership and whistle-blowing attitudes is this relationship mediated by organizational commitment and public service motivation?The American Review of Public Administration, 45, 458-475.
10.
ChiuR. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistle-blowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 65-74.
11.
ChoY. J.PerryJ. L. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and employee attitudes: Role of managerial trustworthiness, goal directedness, and extrinsic reward expectancy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 382-406.
12.
ChoY. J.SaiN. (2012). Does organizational justice matter in the federal workplace?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 227-251.
13.
ColquittJ. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
14.
ConnerM.ArmitageC. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429-1464.
15.
CrawshawJ. R.CropanzanoR.BellC. M.NadisicT. (2013). Organizational justice: New insights from behavioral ethics. Human Relations, 66, 885-904.
16.
CrawshawJ. R.van DickR.BrodbeckF. C. (2012). Opportunity, fair process and relationship value: Career development as a driver of proactive work behaviour. Human Resource Management Journal, 22, 4-20.
17.
CropanzanoR.AmbroseM. L. (2001). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In GreenbergJ.CropanzanoR. (Ed.), Advances in Organizational Justice (pp. 119-151). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
18.
CropanzanoR.ByrneZ. S.BobocelD. R.RuppD. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164-209.
19.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874-900.
20.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134.
21.
DempsterA. P.LairdN. M.RubinD. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39, 1-38.
22.
DozierJ. B.MiceliM. P. (1985). Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Academy of Management Review, 10, 823-836.
23.
FritzM. S.TaylorA. B.MacKinnonD. P. (2012). Explanation of two anomalous results in statistical mediation analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 61-87.
24.
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.
25.
Gould-WilliamsJ. (2007). HR practices, organizational climate and employee outcomes: Evaluating social exchange relationships in local government. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1627-1647.
26.
Gould-WilliamsJ.DaviesF. (2005). Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of HRM practice on employee outcomes: An analysis of public sector workers. Public Management Review, 7, 1-24.
27.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
28.
GrantA. M.DuttonJ. E.RossoB. D. (2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 898-918.
29.
GreenbergJ. (2006). Losing sleep over organizational injustice: Attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 58-69.
30.
GreeneA. D.LattingJ. K. (2004). Whistle-blowing as a form of advocacy: Guidelines for the practitioner and organization. Social Work, 49, 219-230.
31.
GreeneC.HaywoodJ. S. (2008). Does performance pay increase job satisfaction?Economica, 75, 710-728.
32.
GundlachM. J.DouglasS. C.MartinkoM. J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Academy of Management Review, 28, 107-123.
33.
HayesA. F.ScharkowM. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis does method really matter?Psychological Science, 24, 1918-1927.
34.
HoggM. A.TerryD. J.WhiteK. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255-269.
35.
HomansG. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
36.
HosmerL. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 379-403.
37.
HoxJ. J.MaasC. J.BrinkhuisM. J. (2010). The effect of estimation method and sample size in multilevel structural equation modeling. Statistica Neerlandica, 64, 157-170.
38.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
39.
KaplanS. E.SchultzJ. J. (2007). Intentions to report questionable acts: An examination of the influence of the anonymous reporting channel, internal audit quality, and setting. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 109-124.
40.
KeilM.TiwanaA.SainsburyR.SnehaS. (2010). Toward a theory of whistle-blowing intentions: A benefit-to-cost differential perspective. Decision Sciences, 41, 787-812.
41.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
42.
LavenaC. F. (2016). Whistle-blowing individual and organizational determinants of the decision to report wrongdoing in the federal government. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 113-136.
43.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
44.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-192.
45.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
46.
McCarthyR. J. (2012). Blowing in the wind: Answers for federal whistleblowers. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 3, 184.
47.
Mesmer-MagnusJ. R.ViswesvaranC. (2005). Whistle-blowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistle-blowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 277-297.
48.
MiceliM. P.NearJ. P.DworkinT. M. (2008). Whistle-blowing in organizations. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
49.
MonroeK. R. (1994). A fat lady in a corset: Altruism and social theory. American Journal of Political Science, 861-893.
50.
MostafaA. M. S.Gould-WilliamsJ. S.BottomleyP. (2015). High-performance human resource practices and employee outcomes: The mediating role of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 75, 747-757.
51.
MurrayJ. S. (2010). Moral courage in healthcare: Acting ethically even in the presence of risk. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15(3), Manuscript 2.
52.
NearJ. P.MiceliM. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1-16.
53.
NearJ. P.MiceliM. P. (2008). Wrongdoing, whistle-blowing, and retaliation in the US government: What have researchers learned from the merit systems protection board (MSPB) survey results?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 263-281.
54.
PaarlbergL. E.PerryJ. L. (2007). Values management aligning employee values and organization goals. The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 387-408.
55.
ParkH.BlenkinsoppJ. (2009). Whistle-blowing as planned behavior: A survey of South Korean police officers. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 545-556.
56.
ParkS. M. (2012). Toward the trusted public organization untangling the leadership, motivation, and trust relationship in US federal agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 42, 562-590.
57.
ParkS. M.RaineyH. G. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in U.S. federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11, 109-142.
58.
ParkS. M.RaineyH. G. (2012). Work motivation and social communication among public managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 2630-2660.
59.
ParkS. M.WordJ. (2012). Driven to service: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for public and nonprofit managers. Public Personnel Management, 41, 705-734.
60.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-373.
61.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and theory, 6(1), 5-22.
62.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 36(4), 717-731.
63.
RaineyH. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
64.
RosenthalS. A.MooreS.MontoyaR. M.MaruskinL. A. (2009). National leadership index 2009: A national study of confidence in leadership. Cambridge, MA: Center for Public Leadership, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University.
65.
RothwellG. R.BaldwinJ. N. (2006). Ethical climates and contextual predictors of whistle-blowing. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 216-244.
66.
SeifertD. L.SweeneyJ. T.JoiremanJ.ThorntonJ. M. (2010). The influence of organizational justice on accountant whistle-blowing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 707-717.
67.
ShamirB. (1991). Meaning, self and motivation in organizations. Organization Studies, 12, 405-424.
68.
TreviñoL. K.WeaverG. R. (2001). Organizational justice and ethics program follow-through: “Influences on employees” harmful and helpful behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 651-671.
69.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.
70.
UgaddanR. G.ParkS. M. (2017). Quality of leadership and public service motivation: A social exchange perspective on employee engagement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30, 270-285.
71.
US Merit System and Protection Board (MSPB). (2011). Blowing the whistle: Barriers to federal employees making disclosure. A Report to the President and the Congress of the United States: Washington, DC, US Merit System and Protection Board, November.
72.
VaderaA. K.AguileraR. V.CazaB. (2009). Making sense of whistle-blowing’s antecedents: Learning from research on identity and ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 553-586.
73.
VallerandR. J.RatelleC. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. Handbook of self-determination research, 128, 37-63.
74.
VandenabeeleW. (2009). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: More robust evidence of the PSM—Performance relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 11-34.
75.
Van WartM. (2003). Public-sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Administration Review, 63, 214-228.
76.
Van WartM. (2005). Dynamics of leadership in public service: Theory and practice. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
77.
ViswesvaranC.OnesD. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216-226.
78.
WilleA. (2009). Political and administrative leadership in a reinvented European Commission. In ReffelJ. A.LeisinkP.MiddlebrooksA. E. (Eds.), Public Sector Leadership: International Challenges and Perspectives (pp. 125-144). Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
79.
WilsonP. A. (1999). A theory of power and politics and their effects on organizational commitment of senior executive service members. Administration & Society, 31, 120-141.
80.
ZhangY. (2008). The effects of perceived fairness and communication on honesty and collusion in a multi-agent setting. The Accounting Review, 83, 1125-1146.
