Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-12
Talent Management in Public Sector Organizations: A Study on the Impact of Contextual Factors on the TM Approach in Flemish and Dutch Public Sector Organizations
Public sector organizations are confronted with the intensifying competition for talent and suffer from a chronic shortage of talented people. There is little empirical research on the specific talent management (TM) issues in the public sector. This article aims to clarify how public sector organizations conceptualize TM, and particularly what (contextual) factors influence the adoption of an inclusive or a more segmented people management approach in the public sector. Theory on institutional mechanisms and institutional logics is used to clarify the impact of contextual factors. The empirical data are collected in two substudies on TM in the public sector. The data show that TM is highly contextual. Both the organizational internal and external context affect the intended TM strategy, including the actors involved in TM and their interrelated logs. This article is among the first to explore conceptually and empirically the influence of institutional logics on the different aspects of TM approach and as such provides some new directions for future TM research.
BeechlerS.WoodwardI. (2009). The global “war for talent.”Journal of International Management, 15, 273-285.
2.
BévortF.PoulfeltF. (2015). Human resource management in professional services firms: Too good to be true? Transcending conflicting institutional logics. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 29, 102-130.
3.
BoselieJ.LeisinkP.VandenabeeleW. (2011). Human resource management. In NoordegraafM.GeuijenK.MeijerA. (Eds.), Handbook public management (pp. 315-338). Den Haag, The Netherlands: Boom Lemma.
4.
CanhilalS.LeporiB.SeeberM. (2016). Decision-making power and institutional logic in higher education institutions: A comparative analysis of European universities. In PinheiroR.GeschwindL.RamirezF.VrangbÆkK. (Eds.), Towards a comparative institutionalism: Forms, dynamics and logics across the organizational fields of health care and higher education (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 45, pp. 169-194). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
5.
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2006). Talent management: Understanding the dimensions. London, England: Author.
6.
ChristensenT.LægreidP.RonessP.RøvikK. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. New York: Routledge.
7.
CollingsD. G. (2014). Toward mature talent management: Beyond shareholder value. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25, 301-319.
8.
CollingsD. G.MellahiK. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 304-313.
9.
CollingsD. G.ScullionH.VaimanV. (2011). European perspectives on talent management. European Journal of International Management, 5, 453-462.
10.
CurrieG.SpyridonidisD. (2015). Interpretation of multiple institutional logics on the ground: Actors’ position, their agency and situational constraints in professionalized contexts. Organization Studies, 37, 77-97.
11.
DacinM.GoodsteinJ.ScottW. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 46-81.
12.
DaviesB.DaviesB. J. (2010). Talent management in academies. International Journal of Educational Management, 24, 418-426.
13.
DelfgraauwJ.DurR. (2010). Managerial talent, motivation, and self-selection into public management. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9), 654-660.
14.
DiMaggioP.PowellW. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
15.
DunnM.JonesC. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 114-149.
16.
EndersJ.De BoerH. F.FileJ.JongbloedB.WesterheijdenD. F. (2011). Reform of higher education in Europe. In EndersJ.De BoerH. F.WesterheijdenD. (Eds.), Reform of higher education in Europe (pp. 1-10). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
17.
FarndaleE.PaiA.SparrowP.ScullionH. (2014). Balancing individual and organizational goals in global talent management: A mutual-benefits perspective. Journal of World Business, 49, 204-214.
18.
Flemish Government. (2012). Visienota. Naar een talentencultuur binnen de Vlaamse overheid. Brussel: z.u.
19.
FriedlandR.AlfordR. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In PowellW.DiMaggioP. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-266). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
20.
Gallardo-GallardoE.DriesN.González-CruzT. (2013). What is the meaning of “talent” in the world of work?Human Resource Management Review, 23, 290-300.
21.
Gallardo-GallardoE.ThunnissenM. (2016). Standing on the shoulders of giants? A critical review of empirical talent management research. Employee Relations, 38, 31-56.
22.
GlennT. (2012). The state of talent management in Canada’s public sector. Canadian Public Administration, 55, 25-51.
23.
GoodrickE.ReayT. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38, 372-416.
24.
GreenwoodR.RaynardM.KodeihF.MicelottaE.LounsburyM. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317-371.
25.
GrovesK. (2011). Talent management best practices: How exemplary health care organizations create value in a down economy. Health Care Management Review, 36, 227-240.
26.
GuestD. (1999). Human resource management—The workers’ verdict. Human Resource Management Journal, 9(3), 5-25.
27.
HarrisrL.FosterC. (2010). Aligning talent management with approaches to equality and diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29, 422-435.
28.
IlesP.ChuaiX.PreeceD. (2010). Talent management and HRM in multinational companies in Beijing: Definitions, differences and drivers. Journal of World Business, 45, 179-189.
29.
KimC. H.ScullionH. (2011). Exploring the links between corporate social responsibility and global talent management: A comparative study of the UK and Korea. European Journal of International Management, 5, 501-523.
30.
KockR.BurkeM. (2008). Managing talent in the South African public service. Public Personnel Management, 37, 457-470.
31.
KontoghiorghesC. (2016). Linking high performance organizational culture and talent management: Satisfaction/motivation and organizational commitment as mediators. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 1833-1853.
32.
LepakD. P.SnellS. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 31-48.
33.
LounsburyM. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 289-307.
34.
MacfarlaneF.DuberleyJ.FewtrellC.PowellM. (2012). Talent management for NHS managers: Human resources or resourceful humans?Public Money & Management, 32, 445-452.
35.
MeyerR.Egger-PeitlerI.HöllererM.HammerschmidG. (2014). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92, 861-885.
36.
MeyerR.HammerschmidG. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1000-1014.
37.
MeyersM.van WoerkomM. (2014). The influence of underlying philosophies on talent management: Theory, implications for practice, and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 49, 192-203.
38.
NijsS.Gallardo-GallardoE.DriesN.SelsL. (2013). A multidisciplinary review into the definition, operationalization, and measurement of talent. Journal of World Business, 49, 180-191.
39.
NoordegraafM. (2015). Public management: Performance, professionalism and politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
PaauweJ. (2004). HRM and performance: Achieving long-term viability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
PowellM.DuroseJ.DuberleyJ.ExworthyM.FewtrellM. C.MacFarlaneF.MossP. (2012). Talent management in the NHS managerial workforce. Final report. Birmingham: National Institute for Health Research.
42.
ReayT.HiningsC. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30, 629-652.
43.
ScullionH.CollingsD. G.CaligiuriP. (2010). Global talent management. Journal of World Business, 45, 105-108.
44.
SonnenbergM.van ZijderveldV.BrinksM. (2014). The role of talent-perception incongruence in effective talent management. Journal of World Business, 49, 272-280.
45.
StahlG. K.BjörkmanI.FarndaleE.MorrisS. S.PaauweJ.StilesP.. . . WrightP. M. (2012). Six principles of effective global talent management. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 24-32.
46.
StewartJ.HarteV. (2010). The implications of talent management for diversity training: An exploratory study. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34, 506-518.
47.
SwailesS.DownsY.OrrK. (2014). Conceptualising inclusive talent management: Potential, possibilities and practicalities. Human Resource Development International, 17, 529-544.
48.
ThorntonP. H.JonesC.KuryK. (2005). Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: Transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 23, 125-170.
49.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (2008). Institutional logics. In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99-129). London: Sage.
50.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW.LounsburyM. (2012). The institutional logics perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
ThunnissenM.BoselieP.FruytierG. (2013). A review of talent management: “Infancy or adolescence?”The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 1744-1761.
52.
TrussC.GrattonL.Hope-HaileyV.McGovernP.StilesP. (1997). Soft and hard models of human resource management: A reappraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 34, 53-73.
53.
UlrichD.AllenJ. (2014). Talent accelerator: Understanding how talent delivers performance for Asian firms. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 1, 1-23.
54.
VaimanV.CollingsD. G. (2013). Talent management: Advancing the field. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 1737-1743.
55.
VandenabeeleW.LeisinkP.KniesE. (2013). Public value creation and strategic human resource management: Public service motivation as a linking mechanism. In LeisinkP.BoselieP.Van BottenburgM.HoskingD. (Eds.), Managing social issues. A public values perspectives (pp. 37-54). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
56.
van den BrinkM.FruytierB.ThunnissenM. (2013). Talent management in academia: Performance systems and HRM policies. Human Resource Management Journal, 23, 180-195.
57.
van den BroekJ.BoselieJ.PaauweJ. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in health care: “Productive ward: Releasing time to care.”Public Management Review, 16, 1-20.
58.
Westermann-BehayloM.BermanS.Van BurenH. (2014). The influence of institutional logics on corporate responsibility toward employees. Business & Society, 53, 714-746.
59.
WrightP.NishiiL. (2013). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior integrating multiple levels of analysis. In PaauweJ.GuestD.WrightP. (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 97-110). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
