This study tests public service motivation (PSM) by accounting for organizational factors and socialization in shaping motives. Focusing on PSM and its four dimensions, we control for employment at-will as an organizational factor and agency type in influencing organizational socialization. Utilizing hierarchical linear modeling, we evaluate PSM in 10 municipalities at the individual level, while controlling for agency context as a predictor for a second level of analysis. The results underscore the effect of organizational factors, indicating that municipal employees in employment at-will environments have higher levels of self-sacrifice than their civil service counterparts. Although municipal employees in public safety agencies exhibit higher levels of self-sacrifice and commitment to the public interest than their peers in other agencies, their levels of attraction to policy making and compassion are significantly lower. The findings suggest the importance of a multi-dimensional approach to PSM when considering institutional factors and agency socialization in the workplace.
AlonsoP.LewisG. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence from the federal sector. American Review of Public Administration, 31, 363-380.
2.
AndersenL. B. (2007, September19-22). Professional norms, public service motivation or/and economic incentives: What motivates public employees?Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the European Group of Public Administration, Madrid, Spain.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BattaglioR. P. (2010). Public service reform and motivation: Evidence from an employment at-will environment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30, 341-363.
6.
BattaglioR. P. (2014). Public human resource management: Strategies and practices in the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
7.
BattaglioR. P.CondreyS. E. (2009). Reforming public management: Analyzing the impact of public service reform on organizational and managerial trust. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 689-707.
8.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
BowmanJ. S.GertzM. G.GertzS. C.WilliamsR. L. (2003). Civil service reform in Florida state government: Employee attitudes 1 year later. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23, 286-304.
11.
BowmanJ. S.WestJ. P. (2006). Ending civil service protections in Florida government: Experiences in state agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 139-157.
12.
BrewerG. A. (2002, August29-September1). Public service motivation: Theory, evidence, and prospects for research. 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
13.
BrewerG. A. (2008). Employee and organizational performance. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 136-156). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 413-440.
15.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C.FacerR. L.II. (2000). Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 60, 254-264.
16.
BrightL. (2005). Public employees with high levels of public service motivation: Who are they, where are they, and what do they want?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25, 138-154.
17.
BrookD. A.KingC. L. (2008). Federal personnel management reform: From Civil Service Reform Act to National Security Reforms. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 205-221.
18.
CamilleriE. (2007). Antecedents affecting public service motivation. Personnel Review, 36, 356-377.
19.
ChanD. (2001). Method effects of positive affectivity, negative affectivity, and impression management in self-reports of work attitudes. Human Performance, 14, 77-96.
20.
ChanD. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In LanceC. E.VandenbergR. J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 311-338). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
ChristensenR. K.WrightB. E. (2011). The effects of public service motivation on job choice decisions: Disentangling the contributions of person-organization fit and person-job fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 723-743.
22.
CoggburnJ. D. (2001). Personnel deregulation: Exploring differences in the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 223-244.
23.
CoggburnJ. D. (2006). At-will employment in government: Insights from the state of Texas. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 158-177.
24.
CoggburnJ. D.BattaglioR. P.Jr.BowmanJ. S.CondreyS. E.GoodmanD.WestJ. P. (2010). State government human resource professionals’ commitment to employment at will. American Review of Public Administration, 40, 189-208.
25.
CondreyS. E.BattaglioR. P. (2007). A return to spoils? Revisiting radical civil service reform in the United States. Public Administration Review, 67, 425-436.
26.
ConwayJ. M.LanceC. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325-334.
27.
CourseyD. H.PandeyS. K. (2007). Public service motivation measurement: Testing an abridged version of Perry’s proposed scale. Administration & Society, 39, 547-568.
28.
CourseyD. H.PandeyS. K.YangK. (2012). Public service motivation (PSM) and support for citizen participation: A test of Perry and Vandenabeele’s reformulation of PSM Theory. Public Administration Review, 72, 572-582.
29.
CourseyD. H.PerryJ. L.BrudneyJ. L.LittlepageL. (2008). Psychometric verification of Perry’s public service motivation instrument: Results for volunteer exemplars. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 79-90.
30.
Coyle-ShapiroJ.KesslerI. (2003). The employment relationship in the U.K. public sector: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 213-230.
31.
CrewsonP. E. (1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 499-518.
32.
DeHart-DavisL.MarloweK.PandeyS. J. (2006). Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 66, 873-887.
33.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: John Wiley.
34.
EdwardsJ. T.NalbandianJ.WedelK. R. (1981). Individual values and professional education: Implications for practice and education. Administration & Society, 13, 123-143.
35.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
36.
FreyB. S. (1997). A constitution for knaves crowds out civic virtues. The Economic Journal, 107, 1043-1053.
37.
GarsonG. D. (2013). Introductory guide to HLM with HLM 7 software. In GarsonG. D. (Ed.), Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and applications (pp. 55-96). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
38.
GoodmanD.FrenchP. E. (2011). Assessing the temporary use of at-will employment for reorganization and workforce reduction in Mississippi state government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31, 270-290.
39.
GoodmanD.MannS. (2010). Reorganization or political smokescreen: The incremental and temporary use of at-will employment in Mississippi state government. Public Personnel Management, 39, 183-209.
40.
Gould-WilliamsJ. S.MostafaA. M. S.BottomleyP. (2015). Public service motivation and employee outcomes in the Egyptian public sector: Testing the mediating effect of person-organization fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 597-622. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut053
41.
GuyM. E.NewmanM. A.MastracciS. H. (2008). Emotional labor: Putting the service in public service. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
42.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
43.
HaysS. W.SowaJ. E. (2006). A broader look at the “accountability” movement: Some grim realities in state civil service systems. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 102-117.
44.
HoustonD. J. (2011). Implications of occupational locus and focus for public service motivation: Attitudes toward work motives across nations. Public Administration Review, 71, 761-771.
45.
HowellS. E.DayC. L. (2000). Complexities of the gender gap. Journal of Politics, 62, 858-874.
46.
JudgeT.BonoJ.LockeE. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237-249.
47.
KearneyR. C.HaysS. W. (1998). Reinventing government, the New Public Management and civil service systems in international perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18(4), 38-54.
48.
KelloughJ. E. (1999). Reinventing public personnel management: Ethical implications for managers and public personnel systems. Public Personnel Management, 28, 655-671.
49.
KelloughJ. E.NigroL. G. (2002). Pay for performance in Georgia state government: Employee perspectives on GeorgiaGain after 5 years. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22, 146-166.
50.
KelloughJ. E.NigroL. G. (2006). Dramatic reform in the public service: At-will employment and the creation of a new public workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 447-467.
51.
KelloughJ. E.SeldenS. E. (2003). The reinvention of public personnel administration: An analysis of the diffusion of personnel management reforms in the states. Public Administration Review, 63, 165-176.
52.
KettlD. F. (2015). Water flowing uphill: National implications of state civil service movements. Public Administration Review, 75, 190-191.
53.
KimS. (2009). Testing the structure of public service motivation in Korea: A research note. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 839-851.
54.
KimS. (2011). Testing a revised measure of public service motivation: Reflective versus formative specification. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 521-546.
55.
KimS.VandenabeeleW. (2010). A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally. Public Administration Review, 70, 701-709.
56.
KjeldsenA. M.JacobsenC. B. (2013). Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 899-926. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus039
57.
KnokeD.Wright-IsakC. (1982). Individual motives and organizational incentive systems. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, 209-254.
58.
KoehlerM.RaineyH. G. (2008). Interdisciplinary foundations of public service motivation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 33-55). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.
60.
LeeS. H.OlshfskiD. (2002). Employee commitment and firefighters: “It’s my job.”Public Administration Review, 62(Supp. 1), 108-114.
61.
LukeD. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
62.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
63.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York, NY: Free Press.
64.
MastracciS. H.GuyM. E.NewmanM. A. (2011). Emotional labor and crisis response: Working on the razor’s edge. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
65.
Mississippi Code of 1972 Annotated § 21-31-1.
66.
Mississippi Code of 1972 Annotated § 21-31-3.
67.
Mississippi Code of 1972 Annotated § 21-31-13.
68.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67, 40-53.
69.
NaffK. C.CrumJ. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5-16.
70.
NewstromJ. W.ReifW. E.MonczkaR. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Fact vs. fiction. Public Personnel Management, 5, 67-72.
71.
NigroL. G.KelloughJ. E. (2000). Civil service reform in Georgia. Going to the edge?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(3), 41-54.
72.
NigroL. G.KelloughJ. E. (2008). Personnel reform in the states: A look at progress fifteen years after the Winter Commission. Public Administration Review, 68, S50-S57.
73.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 5-22.
74.
PerryJ. L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 181-197.
75.
PerryJ. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 471-488.
76.
PerryJ. L.EngbersT. A.JunS. Y. (2009). Back to the future? Performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review, 69, 39-51.
77.
PerryJ. L.VandenabeeleW. (2008). Behavioral dynamics: Institutions, identities, and self-regulation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 56-79). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
78.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-373.
79.
RadinT. J.WerhaneP. (1996). The public/private distinction and the political status of employment. American Business Law Journal, 34, 245-260.
80.
RaineyH. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16, 288-302.
RoehlingM. V.WrightP. (2004). Organizationally sensible vs. legal-centric responses to the eroding employment at-will doctrine. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 16, 89-103.
83.
RyanR. M.DeciE. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
84.
ShalleyC. E.GilsonL. L.BlumT. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489-505.
85.
SkinnerB. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
86.
SteelB. S.WarnerR. L. (1990). Job satisfaction among early labor force participants: Unexpected outcomes in public and private sector comparisons. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 10(3), 4-22.
87.
TaylorJ. (2010). Public service motivation, civic attitudes and actions of public, nonprofit and private sector employees. Public Administration, 88, 1083-1098.
VandenabeeleW. (2008). Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice. Public Administration, 86, 1089-1105.
92.
VandenabeeleW. (2011). Who wants to deliver public service? Do institutional antecedents of public service motivation provide an answer?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31, 87-107.
93.
WeibelA.RostK.OsterlohM. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector—Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 387-412.
94.
WilliamsL. J.VandenbergR. J.EdwardsJ. R. (2009). 12 structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 543-604.
95.
WittmerD. (1991). Serving the people or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, hybrid sector, and business managers. Public Productivity & Management Review, 14, 369-383.
96.
WrightB. E. (2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter?Public Administration Review, 67, 54-64.
97.
WrightB. E. (2008). Methodological challenges associated with public service motivation research. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 80-98). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
98.
WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person–organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration & Society, 40, 502-521.
99.
YaegerS. J.RabinJ.VocinoT. (1982). Professional values of public servants in the United States. American Review of Public Administration, 16, 402-412.
