Where Does Public Service Motivation Count the Most in Government Work Environments? A Preliminary Empirical Investigation and Hypotheses

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that public service motivation (PSM) is positively associated with the compatibility that public employees have to public organizations. However, the person–work environment (PE Fit) research also highlights the importance of compatibility not only between individuals and organizations (PO Fit) but also between individuals and jobs (PJ Fit). Hence, there is a need for research that investigates the level of the government work environment that PSM contributes to the most. Subsequently, this study sought to shed some light on the relationship that PSM has to PO Fit and PJ Fit. Using a sample of 205 randomly selected employees drawn from three public organizations in the States of Oregon, Indiana, and Kentucky, PSM was found to be a significantly better predictor of PO Fit, than PJ Fit. The implications of this finding for public administration research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

person–environment fit person–organization fit person–job fit public service motivation job satisfaction job performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alonso

Lewis

G. B.

(2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence from the federal sector. The American Review of Public Administration, 31, 363-380.

Anderson

L. B.

(2009). What determine the behavior and performance of health professionals? Public service motivation, professional norms, and/or economic incentives. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 79-97.

Borman

W. C.

Motosidlo

S. J.

(1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel Selection Research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.

Boxx

Odom

Dunn

(1991). Organizational values and value congruency and their impact on satisfaction, commitment, and cohesion. Public Personnel Management, 20, 195-205.

Bretz

R. D.

Judge

T. A.

(1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32-54.

Brewer

G. A.

Selden

S. C.

(1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 413-440.

Brewer

G. A.

Selden

S. C.

Facer

L. F.

(2000). Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 60, 254-264.

Bright

(2005). Public employees with high levels of public service motivation: Who are they, where are they, and what do they want? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25, 138-154.

Bright

. (2007). Does person-organization fit mediate the relationship between public service motivation and the job performance of public employees? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27, 361-379.

10.

Bright

(2008). Does public service motivation really make a difference on the job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees? American Review of Public Administration, 38, 149-166.

11.

Bright

(2009). Why do public employees desire intrinsic non-monetary workplace opportunities? Public Personnel Management, 38, 15-37.

12.

Cable

D. M.

DeRue

D. S.

(2002). The convergent and discriminate validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875-884.

13.

Campbell

J. P.

McCloy

R. A.

Oppler

S. H.

Sager

C. E.

(1993). A theory of performance. In Schmitt

Borman

W. C.

(Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

14.

Chatman

(1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management, 14, 333-349.

15.

Curran

P. J.

West

S. G.

Finch

J. F.

(1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16-29.

16.

Dehart-Davis

Marlowe

Sanjay

P. K.

(2007). Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 66, 873-887.

17.

Hoffman

B. J.

Woehr

D. J.

(2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 389-399.

18.

Kim

(2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 245-261.

19.

Kim

(2006). Public service motivation and organizational citizenship behavior in Korea. International Journal of Manpower, 27, 722-740.

20.

Kristof

A. L.

(1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personal Psychology, 49, 1-49.

21.

Kristof-Brown

A. L.

Zimmerman

R. D.

Johnson

E. C.

(2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personal Psychology, 58, 281-342.

22.

Lauver

K. J.

Kristof-Brown

(2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 454-470.

23.

Leisink

Steijn

(2009). Public service motivation and job performance of public sector employees in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 35-52.

24.

Lewis

G. B.

Frank

S. A.

(2002). Who wants to work for government? Public Administration Review, 62, 395-404.

25.

Light

P. C.

(1999). The new public service. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutions Press.

26.

Lovelance

Rosen

(1996). Differences in achieving person-organization fit among diverse groups of managers. Journal of Management, 22, 703-722.

27.

MacCallum

Browne

Sugawara

(1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.

28.

Mintzberg

(1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

29.

Moynihan

D. P.

Pandey

S. K.

(2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67, 40-53.

30.

Munchinsky

P. M.

Monahon

C. J.

(1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary verse complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 268-277.

31.

Naff

K. C.

Crum

(1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19, 5-15.

32.

O’Reilly

C. A.

Chatman

(1986). Organization commitment and psychological attachment: The influences of compliance, identification, internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492-499.

33.

Organ

(1998). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

34.

Perry

(1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 5-22.

35.

Perry

(1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2, 181-197.

36.

Perry

Hondeghem

(Eds.). (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

37.

Perry

Porter

L. W.

(1982). Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Academy of Management Review, 7, 89-98.

38.

Perry

Vandenabeele

(2008). Behavioral dynamics: Institutions, identities, and self-regulation. In Perry

Hondeghem

(Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 56-79). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

39.

Perry

Wise

(1990). The motivational basis of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-373.

40.

Ritz

(2009). Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 53-78.

41.

Scott

P. G.

Pandey

S. K.

(2005). Red tape and public service motivation: Findings from a national survey of managers in state health and human services agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25, 155-180.

42.

Sims

Kroeck

(1994). The influence of ethical fit on employee satisfaction, commitment and turnover. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 939-948.

43.

Steen

(2008). Not a government monopoly: The private, nonprofit, and voluntary sectors. In Perry

Hondeghem

(Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 203-222). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

44.

Vancouver

J. B.

Schmitt

N. W.

(1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 33-352.

45.

Vandenabeele

(2009). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: More robust evidence of the PSM-performance relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 11-34.

46.

Verquer

M. L.

Beehr

T. A.

Wagner

S. H.

(2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473-489.

47.

Volcker

(1987). Public service: The quiet crisis. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

48.

Wilson

J. Q.

(1993). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.

49.

Wright

Pandey

(2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person- organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration & Society, 40, 502-521.