To challenge the Foucauldian legacy of Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon prison, scholars often highlight Bentham’s later writings on the democratic power of public opinion. In doing so, they reaffirm Bentham’s reputation as a unreserved proponent of transparency. To recover the limits of Bentham’s embrace of publicity, I examine the model of visibility exemplified by his designs for the Sotimion, a residence for unmarried, pregnant women. The Sotimion draws our attention to Bentham’s appreciation for concealment as a method of preventing individual and social harms caused by publicity and his criticisms of ascetic sexual norms. By being able to see visitors without being seen by them, the residents of the Sotimion would have avoided social censure while continuing to meet with friends, family, and even lovers. The Sotimion designs eschewed the panoptic principle, the use of asymmetric surveillance to reform moral behavior, and offered what I call the “soteric principle,” the use of asymmetric surveillance to protect the observer from punishment. By comparing the Sotimion to the Magdalen Hospital for Penitent Prostitutes and Bentham’s discussions of panoptic institutions for women, I examine the Sotimion’s distinctiveness while acknowledging its normalizing effects for residents from lower socioeconomic classes. Just as the panopticon captured Bentham’s commitment to publicity, applying the soteric model to Bentham’s theory of public opinion highlights his commitment to secrecy for protecting critics of government abuses from retribution.
AndrewDonna. 1989. Philanthropy and Police: London Charity in the Eighteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
BahmuellerCharles F.1981. The National Charity Company: Jeremy Bentham’s Silent Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
BatailleRobert. 1997. “The Magdalen Charity for the Reform of Prostitutes: A Foucauldian Moment.” In Illicit Sex: Identity Politics in Early Modern Culture, edited by DiPieroThomasGillPat, 109–22. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
4.
BenthamJeremy. 1978. “Offences Against One’s Self.” Edited by Louis Crompton. Journal of Homosexuality3: 389–405, and4: 91–107.
5.
BenthamJeremy.1989. First Principles Preparatory to Constitutional Code. Edited by SchofieldPhilip. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6.
BenthamJeremy. 1990. Securities against Misrule and Other Constitutional Writings for Tripoli and Greece. Edited by SchofieldPhilip. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
BenthamJeremy. 1995. The Panopticon Writings. New York: Verso.
8.
BenthamJeremy. 1999. Political Tactics. Edited by JamesMichaelBlamiresCyprianPease-WatkinCatherine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9.
BenthamJeremy. 2001. Writings on the Poor Laws: I. Edited by QuinnMichael. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.
BenthamJeremy. 2010. Writings on the Poor Laws: II. Edited by QuinnMichael. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11.
BenthamJeremy. 2012. On the Liberty of the Press, and Public Discussion, and Other Legal and Political Writings for Spain and Portugal. Edited by Pease-WatkinCatherineSchofieldPhilip. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12.
BenthamJeremy. 2014. Of Sexual Irregularities, and Other Writings on Sexual Morality. Edited by SchofieldPhilipPease-WatkinCatherineQuinnMichael. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13.
BenthamJeremy. 2017a. Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham Volume 4: October 1788 to December 1793. Edited by MilneAlexander Taylor. London: UCL Press.
14.
BenthamJeremy. 2017b. Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham Volume 5: January 1794 to December 1797. Edited by MilneAlexander Taylor. London: UCL Press.
BinhammerKatherine. 1996. “The Sex Panic of the 1790s.” Journal of the History of Sexuality6, no. 3: 409–34.
17.
BinhammerKatherine. 2009. The Seduction Narrative in Britain, 1747-1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
BoraleviLea Campos. 1984. Bentham and the Oppressed. New York: De Gruyter, Inc.
19.
BoydRichardLauraField. 2016. “Blind Injustice: Theorizing Anonymity and Accountability in Modern Democracies.” Polity48, no. 3: 332–58.
20.
BridgesKhiara M.2017. The Poverty of Privacy Rights. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
BrunoJonathan R.2017. “Vigilance and Confidence: Jeremy Bentham, Publicity, and the Dialectic of Political Trust and Distrust.” American Political Science Review111, no. 2: 295–307.
22.
Brunon-ErnstAnne. 2012. “Deconstructing Panopticism into the Plural Panopticons.” In Beyond Foucault: New Perspectives on Bentham’s Panopticon, edited by Brunon-ErnstAnne, 17–42. New York: Routledge.
23.
CotAnnie L.2003. “Jeremy Bentham on the Status of Women.” In The Status of Women in Classical Economic Thought, edited by DimandRobertNylandChris, 165–193. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
24.
EngelmannStephen G.2014. “Queer Utilitarianism: Bentham and Malthus on the Threshold of Biopolitics.” Theory & Event17, no. 4. muse.jhu.edu/article/562822.
25.
EvansTanya. 2005. “‘Unfortunate Objects’: London’s Unmarried Mothers in the Eighteenth Century.” Gender & History 17, no. 1 (April): 127–153.
26.
FergusonFrances. 2005. Pornography, the Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
FergusonFrances. 2019. “Not Kant, but Bentham: On Taste.” Critical Inquiry45 (Spring): 577–600.
28.
FoucaultMichel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by SheridanAlan. New York: Pantheon.
29.
FoucaultMichel. 1987. “The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom: An Interview with Michel Foucault.” Philosophy and Social Criticism12, no. 2/3: 112–131.
30.
FoucaultMichel. 1990. History of Sexuality Vol. I: An Introduction. Translated by HurleyRobert. New York: Vintage.
31.
HillBridget. 2001. Women Alone: Spinsters in England 1660-1850. New Haven: Yale University Press.
32.
ItaiHiroaki. 2019. “Surveillance and Metaphor of ‘Tribunal’ in Bentham’s Utilitarianism.” Revue d’études Benthamiennes 16. DOI: 10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.6132
33.
LavalChristian. 2012. “FromDiscipline and Punish to the Birth of Biopolitics.” In Beyond Foucault: New Perspectives on Bentham’s Panopticon, edited by Brunon-ErnstAnne, 43–61. New York: Routledge.
34.
LavalChristian. 2017. “‘The Invisible Chain’: Jeremy Bentham and Neo-Liberalism.” History of European Ideas43, no. 1: 34–52.
35.
LeroyMarie-Laure. 2012. “Transparency and Politics: The Reversed Panopticon as a Response to Abuse of Power.” In Beyond Foucault: New Perspectives on Bentham’s Panopticon, edited by Brunon-ErnstAnne, 143–60. New York: Routledge.
36.
MaxwellLida. 2019. Insurgent Truth: Chelsea Manning and the Politics of Outsider Truth Telling. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
Magdalen Hospital. 1787. Rules, Orders, and Regulations of the Magdalen Hospital For the Reception of Penitent Prostitutes. London.
38.
McClureRuth. 1981. Coram’s Children: The London Foundling Hospital in the Eighteenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.
39.
Pease-WatkinCatherine. 2002. “Jeremy and Samuel Bentham–The Private and the Public.” Journal of Bentham Studies5, no. 1: 1–27.
40.
PerryRuth. 1991. “Colonizing the Breast: Sexuality and Maternity in Eighteenth-Century England.” Journal of the History of Sexuality2, no. 2 (October): 204–234.
41.
QuinnMichael. 2008. “A Failure to Reconcile the Irreconcilable? Security, Subsistence and Equality in Bentham’s Writings on the Civil Code and on the Poor Laws.” History of Political Thought29, no. 2 (Summer): 320–343.
42.
QuinnMichael. 2017. “Jeremy Bentham, Choice Architect: Law, Indirect Legislation, and the Context of Choice.” History of European Ideas43, no. 1: 11–33.
43.
RauserAmelia. 2017. “Vitalist Statues and the Belly Pad of1793.” Journal183, Lifelike (Spring). doi: 10.30610/3.2017.2
44.
RosenDavidAaronSantesso. 2010. “The Panopticon Reviewed: Sentimentalism and Eighteenth-Century Interiority.” ELH77, no. 4 (Winter): 1041–1059.
45.
RosenFred. 1983. Jeremy Bentham and Representative Democracy: A Study of the Constitutional Code. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 1960. Politics and the Arts: Letter to M. D’Alembert on the Theatre. Translated by BloomAllan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
47.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 1979. Emile or On Education. Translated by BloomAllan. New York, Basic Books.
48.
SchofieldPhilip. 2004. “Jeremy Bentham, the French Revolution and Political Radicalism.” History of European Ideas30, no. 4: 381–401.
49.
SchofieldPhilip. 2006. Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
SempleJanet. 1992. “Foucault and Bentham: A Defence of Panopticism.” Utilitas4, no. 1: 105– 20.
51.
SempleJanet. 1993. Bentham’s Prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
SmithCharlotteHarrietGuestJudithStanton. 2008. “Charlotte Smith to Thomas Cadell, Sr., and Harriet Lee: Two New Letters.” Keats-Shelley Journal57: 32–41.
53.
SokolMary. 2011. Bentham, Law and Marriage: A Utilitarian Code of Law in Historical Contexts. New York: Bloomsbury.
54.
SteadmanPhilip. 2012. “Samuel Bentham’s Panopticon.” Journal of Bentham Studies14: 1–30.
55.
WaldronJeremy. 1987. “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism.” The Philosophical Quarterly37, no. 147: 127–50.
56.
WilliamsSamantha. 2011. “The Experience of Pregnancy and Childbirth for Unmarried Mothers in London, 1760–1866.” Women’s History Review20, no. 1: 67–86.
57.
WilliamsSamantha. 2018. Unmarried Motherhood in the Metropolis, 1700-1850: Pregnancy, Poor Law, and Provision. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
WillifordMiriam. 1975. “Bentham on the Rights of Women.” Journal of the History of Ideas36, no. 1: 167–176.
59.
WolinSheldon. 1960. Politics and Vision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
ZerilliLinda M.G.1994. Signifying Woman: Culture and Chaos in Rousseau, Burke, and Mill. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
