This article offers a theoretical explanation, in terms of a two-factor approach to a POX Situation, in an attempt to fill the void that exists in the face of the Heider-Newcomb controversy about POX balance. Both Heider's mathematicalformulafor balance criterion and Newcomb's three-category propositions regarding POX triads have been found untenable by the reported experimental research. Thisparadox is resolved by the two-factor approach, validity and parsimony of which is demonstrated by applying it to some of the POX data reported in earlier studies (see, for example, Jordan [1953], Rodrigues [1965], Aderman [1969], Gutman and Knox [1972], Insko et al. [19741).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ADERMAN, D. (1969) "Effects of anticipating future interaction on the preference for balanced states."J. of Personality and Social Psychology11: 214.-219.
2.
BERSCHEID, E. (1983) "Emotion," in H. H. Kelley et al. (eds.) Close Relationships. New York: Freeman.
3.
CARTWRIGHT, D. and F. HARARY (1970) "Ambivalence and indifference in generalizations of structural balance."Behavioral Sci.15: 497-513.
4.
CARTWRIGHT, D. and F. HARARY (1956) "Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's Theory."Psych. Rev.63: 277-293.
5.
CROCKETT, W. H. (1974) "Balance agreement and subjective evaluations of the P-O-X triads."J. of Personality and Social Psychology29: 102-110.
6.
DUCK, S. , A. LOCK, G. McCALL, M. A. FITZPATRICK, and J.C. COYNE (1984) "Social and personal relationships: a joint editorial."J. of Social and Personal Relations1: 1-10.
7.
GOLLOB, H. F. (1979) "A reply to Norman H. Anderson's critique of the subject-verbobject approach to social cognition."J. of Personality and Social Psychology37: 391-399.
8.
GOLLOB, H. F. (1974) "The subject-verb-object approach to social cognition."Psych. Rev.31: 286-321.
9.
GUTMAN, G. M. and R. E. KNOX (1972) "Balance, agreement, and attraction in pleasantness, tension, and consistency ratings of hypothetical social situations. J. of Personality and Social Psychology23: 351-357.
10.
HEIDER, F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley.
11.
HEIDER, F. (1946) "Attitudes and cognitive organization."J. of Psychology21: 107-112.
12.
HEIDER, F. (1944) "Social perception and phenomenal causality."Psych. Rev.51: 358-374.
13.
INSKO, C. A. and A. ADEWOLE (1979) "The role of assumed reciprocation of sentiment and assumed similarity in the production of attraction and agreement effects in P-O-X triads."J. of Personality and Social Psychology37: 790-808.
14.
INSKO, C. A. , A. J. SEDLAK, and A. LIPSITZ (1982) " A two-valued logic or two-valued balance resolution of the challenge of agreement and attraction effects in P-O-X triads, and a theoretical perspective on conformity and hedonism."European J. of Social Psychology13: 143-167.
15.
INSKO, C. A. , E. SONGER, and W. McGARVEY (1974) " Balance, positivity and agreement in the Jordan paradigm: a defense of a balance theory."J. of Personality and Social Psychology10: 58-83.
16.
JORDAN, N. (1953) "Behavioral forces that are a function of attitude and cognitive organization."Human Relations6: 273-287.
17.
MOWER-WHITE, C. J. (1979) "Factors affecting balance, agreement and positivity biases in POQ and POX triads."European J. of Social Psychology9: 129-148.
18.
NEWCOMB, T. M. (1968) "Interpersonal balance," pp. 28-51 in R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, and P. Tannenbaum (eds.) Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Source Book. Chicago: Rand McNally.
19.
PRICE, K.O. , E. HARBURG, and T. M. NEWCOMB (1966) "Psychological balance in the situation of negative interpersonal attitudes."J. of Personality and Social Psychology3: 265-270.
20.
RODRIGUES, A. (1968) "The biasing effect of agreement in balanced and imbalanced triads."J. of Personality36: 138-153.
21.
RODRIGUES, A. (1965) "On the differential effects of some parameters of balance."J. of Psychology61: 241-250.
22.
RODRIGUES, A. and T. M. NEWCOMB (1980) "The balance principle: its current state and its integrative function in social psychology."Interamerican J. of Psychology14: 85-136.
23.
RODRIGUES, A. and C. R. ZIVIANI (1974) " A theoretical explanation for the intermediate level of tension found in non-balanced P-O-X triads."J. of Psychology88: 47-56.
24.
WELLENS, A. and D. L. THISTLEWAITHE, (1971) "Analysis of two quantitative theories of cognitive balance."Psych. Rev.78: 141-150.
25.
WIEST, W. M. (1965) "A quantitative extension of Heider's theory of cognitive balance applied to interpersonal perception and self-esteem."Psych. Monographs79, 1-1 (Whole No. 607).
26.
ZAJONC, R. B. (1968) "Cognitive theories in social psychology," in G. Lindsey and E. Aronson (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
