Islamic moderateness is said to be one of the key factors that contribute to the promotion of peace in Muslim societies. We present an empirical study conducted in Indonesia (N = 299) that assessed Islamic political moderateness and examined its role in explaining Muslims’ tolerance towards non-Muslims, as well as the first group’s support for making reconciliation with the latter group. We found as hypothesised that Islamic political moderateness was a positive predictor of outgroup tolerance, because of the role it had in positively predicting the sense of national identity as a higher order identity vis-à-vis Islamic identity (i.e. higher order nested identity). Outgroup tolerance positively predicted and, in turn, fully mediated the positive association between Islamic political moderateness and Muslims’ reconciliatory tendencies, including feelings of collective guilt and shame, intergroup trust and perspective-taking, intergroup cooperation, willingness to apologise, as well as support for intergroup empowerment and reparative actions. These findings suggest the benefit of Islamic political moderateness to drive Muslims to appreciate the existence of non-Muslims. We discuss these empirical findings in terms of theoretical implications, research limitations and practical implications.
AbdillahM. (2013). Religious education in Indonesia: The case of Islamic education. In DavisD.MiroshnikovaE. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of religious education (pp. 178–183). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203106075
2.
AchilovD.SenS. (2017). Got political Islam? Are politically moderate Muslims really different from radicals?International Political Science Review, 38(5), 608–624. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0192512116641940
3.
AksoyM. (2017). A comparison of nested and cross-cutting common ingroup identities and the role of ingroup projection, distinctiveness and intergroup threat on outgroup attitudes [Bachelor’s thesis, University of Twente]. https://essay.utwente.nl/72719/1/Aksoy_BA_BMS.pdf
4.
Alfitri. (2018). Religion and constitutional practices in Indonesia: How far should the state intervene in the administration of Islam?Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 13(2), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.20
5.
AliF. (2018). Incorporating values of moderate Islam for the 21st century learners in an English as a foreign language class. Edukasia Islamika, 3, 18–31.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
8.
AshforthS. A.JohnsonS. A. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organisational contexts. In HoggM. A.TerryD. J. (Eds.), Social identity processes in organisational contexts (pp. 31–48). Psychology Press.
9.
AveryP. G.BirdK.JohnstoneS.SullivanJ. L.ThalhammerK. (1992). Exploring political tolerance with adolescents. Theory & Research in Social Education, 20(4), 386–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1992.10505680
Bar-TalD.BenninkG. (2004). Nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Bar-Siman-TovY. (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11–38). Oxford University Press.
12.
BitonY.SalomonG. (2006). Peace in the eyes of Israeli and Palestinian youths: Effects of collective narratives and peace education program. Journal of Peace Research, 43(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022343306061888
13.
BrewerM. B. (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In JacksonS. E.RudermanM. N. (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 47–68). American Psychological Association.
14.
BrewerM. B.PierceK. P. (2005). Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167204271710
15.
BruneauE. G.SaxeR. (2012). The power of being heard: The benefits of perspective-giving in the context of intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.017
16.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124104268644
CrawfordJ. T. (2014). Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.002
19.
DoosjeB.MoghaddamF. M.KruglanskiA. W.De WolfA.MannL.FeddesA. R. (2016). Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.008
20.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.SaguyT. (2008). Another view of we: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 296–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701726132
21.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.SaguyT. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of we: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1088868308326751
22.
DuncanC. R. (2014). Violence and vengeance: Religious conflict and its aftermath in eastern Indonesia. NUS Press.
23.
EickelmanD. F.PiscatoriJ. (1996). Muslim politics. Princeton University Press.
24.
EspositoJ. (1998). Islam: The straight path. Oxford University.
25.
FisherR. J. (2016). The social psychology of intergroup and international conflict resolution. In FisherR. D. (Ed.), Towards a social-psychological model of intergroup conflict (pp. 73–86). Springer.
26.
FullerG. (2003). The future of political Islam. Palgrave.
27.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.
28.
Gobodo-MadikizelaP. (2008). Transforming trauma in the aftermath of gross human rights abuses: Making public spaces intimate through the South African truth and reconciliation commission. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 57–76). Oxford University Press.
29.
HalperinE. (2011). Emotional barriers to peace: Emotions and public opinion of Jewish Israelis about the peace process in the Middle East. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 17(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10781919.2010.487862
HilmyM. (2013). Whither Indonesia’s Islamic moderatism? A reexamination on the moderate vision of Muhammadiyah and NU. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 7(1), 24–48. http://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2013.7.1.24-48
HorganJ.BraddockK. (2010). Rehabilitating the terrorists? Challenges in assessing the effectiveness of de-radicalization programs. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546551003594748
34.
HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1207%2FS15327957PSPR0402_03
35.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
36.
HudaQ. U. (2006). Conflict prevention and peace-building efforts by American Muslim organizations following September 11. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 26(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602000600937630
37.
HunsbergerB. (1995). Religion and prejudice: The role of religious fundamentalism, quest, and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 51(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01326.x
IyerA.LeachC. (2010). Helping disadvantaged out-groups challenge unjust inequality. In StürmerS.SnyderM. (Eds.), The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping (pp. 337–353). Willey-Blackwell.
40.
JonkerT. (2018). Us, them and we: The effect of nested and cross-cutting common ingroup identities on outgroup attitudes [Master’s thesis, University of Twente]. https://essay.utwente.nl/76938/1/Jonker_MS_BMS.pdf
41.
KamaliM. H. (2015). The middle path of moderation in Islam: The Qur’anic principle of wasatiyyah. Oxford University Press.
42.
KelmanH. C. (2004). Reconciliation as identity change: A social psychological perspective. In Bar-Siman-TovY. (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 111–124). Oxford University Press.
43.
KishtonJ. M.WidamanK. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013164494054003022
44.
KnoxC.QuirkP. (Eds.). (2000). Peacebuilding in Northern Ireland, Israel and South Africa. Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
KriesbergL. (2007). Reconciliation: Aspects, growth, and sequences. International Journal of Peace Studies, 12(1), 1–21.
LevyA.SaguyT.van ZomerenM.HalperinE. (2017). Ingroups, outgroups, and the gateway groups between: The potential of dual identities to improve intergroup relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.011
48.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
49.
LukitoR. (2013). Legal pluralism in Indonesia: Bridging the unbridgeable. Routledge.
50.
MashuriA.SupriyonoY.KhotimahS. K.SakdiahH.SukmawatiF.ZaduqistiE. (2014). Examining predictors of tolerance and helping for Islamic religious minorities in Indonesia. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 3(2), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsp.2013.495
51.
MashuriA.van LeeuwenE. (2018). Predicting support for reconciliation in separatist conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167217733076
52.
MashuriA.van LeeuwenE. (in press). Promoting reconciliation in separatist conflict: The effect of morality framing. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
53.
MashuriA.van LeeuwenE.HanurawanF. (2018). How morality threat promotes reconciliation in separatist conflict: A majority group perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(6), 913–930. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1368430216677302
54.
MashuriA.van LeeuwenE.van VugtM. (2018). Remember your crimes: How an appeal to ingroup wrongdoings fosters reconciliation in separatist conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12261
55.
MashuriA.ZaduqistiE.Alroy-ThibergeD. (2017). The role of dual categorization and relative ingroup prototypicality in reparations to a minority group: An examination of empathy and collective guilt as mediators. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 20(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12163
56.
MedranoJ. D.GutiérrezP. (2001). Nested identities: National and European identity in Spain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(5), 753–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120063963
57.
MenchikJ.TrostK. (2018). A tolerant Indonesia? Indonesian Muslims in comparative perspective. In HefnerR. (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary Indonesia (pp. 390–405). Routledge.
58.
MietznerM. (2018). Fighting illiberalism with illiberalism: Islamist populism and democratic deconsolidation in Indonesia. Pacific Affairs, 91(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.5509/2018912261
59.
MubarokM. Z.HamidA. F. A. (2018). The rise of radicalism and terrorism in Indonesia and Malaysia. Review of Islam in Southeast Asia, 1(1), 29–43.
60.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).
61.
NadlerA. (2012). Intergroup reconciliation: Definitions, processes and future directions. In TroppL. (Ed.), The Oxford book of intergroup conflict (pp. 291–309). Oxford University Press.
62.
NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.). (2008). Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation: From violent conflict to peaceful co-existence. Oxford University Press.
63.
NollJ. V. D.PoppeE.VerkuytenM. (2010). Political tolerance and prejudice: Differential reactions toward Muslims in the Netherlands. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530903540067
64.
PearceS. (2005). Religious rage: A quantitative analysis of the intensity of religious conflicts. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17(3), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550590929237
65.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R.WagnerU.ChristO. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
66.
PohlmanA. (2016). Janda PKI: Stigma and sexual violence against communist widows following the 1965–1966 massacres in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 44(128), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2015.1100873
67.
PowellR.ClarkeS. (2013). Religion, tolerance and intolerance. In ClarkeS.PowellR.SavulescuJ. (Eds.), Scientific and conceptual investigations of religious conflict (pp. 1–36). Oxford University Press.
68.
PreacherK. J.CoffmanD. L. (2006, May). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer Software]. http://quantpsy.org/
69.
PutraI. E.HoltzP.PitalokaA.KronbergerN.ArbiyahN. (2018). Reports positive essentialization reduces prejudice: Reminding participants of a positive human nature alleviates the stigma of Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) descent. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i2.794
70.
PutraI. E.WagnerW.RufaedahA.HoltzP. (2019). Identity, representations, religion, and apologizing for past wrongdoings: Muslim discourse about Indonesia’s 1965–66 massacres of communists. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29(6), 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2419
71.
QureshiN. (2016). No God but one: Allah or Jesus? (with bonus content): A former Muslim investigates the evidence for Islam and Christianity. Zondervan.
RotellaK. N.RichesonJ. A. (2013). Motivated to ‘forget’ the effects of in-group wrongdoing on memory and collective guilt. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 730–737. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1948550613482986
74.
RouhanaN. N. (2011). Key issues in reconciliation: Challenging traditional assumptions on conflict resolution and power dynamics. In Bar-TalD. (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 291–314). Psychology Press.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
77.
ShamsulA. B. (2005). Islam embedded moderate political Islam and governance in the Malay world. In NathanK. S.KamaliM. H. (Eds.), Islam in Southeast Asia: Political, social and strategic challenges for the 21st century (pp. 103–120). Institute of Southeast Asian Study.
78.
ShnabelN.NadlerA.Canetti-NisimD.UllrichJ. (2008). The role of acceptance and empowerment in promoting reconciliation from the perspective of the needs-based model. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2(1), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2008.00014.x
79.
SimonB.SchaeferC. D. (2016). Tolerance as a function of disapproval and respect: The case of Muslims. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(2), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12137
80.
SimonB.SchaeferC. D. (2018). Muslims’ tolerance towards outgroups: Longitudinal evidence for the role of respect. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12213
81.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W.MullenE. (2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167204263968
82.
SmeekesA.VerkuytenM.PoppeE. (2012). How a tolerant past affects the present: Historical tolerance and the acceptance of Muslim expressive rights. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(11), 1410–1422. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167212450920
83.
StaubE. (2007). Preventing violence and terrorism and promoting positive relations between Dutch and Muslim communities in Amsterdam. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13(3), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10781910701471397
84.
SullivanJ. L.TransueJ. E. (1999). The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 625–650. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.625
85.
SutomoI. (2014). Modification of character education into Akhlaq education for the global community life. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 4(2), 291–316. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v4i2.291-316
86.
SuyantoB.SirryM. I.SugihartatiR. (2019). Pseudo-radicalism and the de-radicalization of educated youth in Indonesia. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2019.1654726
87.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
88.
van ProoijenJ. W.KrouwelA. P. (2019). Psychological features of extreme political ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0963721418817755
89.
van ProoijenJ. W.KrouwelA. P.BoitenM.EendebakL. (2015). Fear among the extremes: How political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 485–497.
90.
Van ZomerenM.FischerA. H.SpearsR. (2007). Testing the limits of tolerance: How intergroup anxiety amplifies negative and offensive responses to out-group-initiated contact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(12), 1686–1699. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167207307485
91.
VerkuytenM. (2009). Support for multiculturalism and minority rights: The role of national identification and out-group threat. Social Justice Research, 22(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0087-7
92.
VerkuytenM.SlooterL. (2007). Tolerance of Muslim beliefs and practices: Age related differences and context effects. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(5), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0165025407081480
93.
VerkuytenM.YogeeswaranK. (2017). The social psychology of intergroup toleration: A roadmap for theory and research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1088868316640974
94.
VerkuytenM.YogeeswaranK.AdelmanL. (2019). Intergroup toleration and its implications for culturally diverse societies. Social Issues and Policy Review, 13(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12051
95.
WaldzusS.MummendeyA.WenzelM.WeberU. (2003). Towards tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00507-3
96.
WeldonS. A. (2006). The institutional context of tolerance for ethnic minorities: A comparative, multilevel analysis of Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00187.x
97.
WickhamC. (2004). The problem with coercive democratization: The Islamist response to the US democracy reform initiative. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4419.1018
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
