Nonbelievers represent an understudied population in Greece. This investigation reports on the translation, cultural adaptation, and initial validation of the Nonreligious-Nonspiritual Scale (NRNSS), a measure designed to assess nonbelief. Data from 1754 participants were collected to examine the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the instrument and to assess the nationwide interpretability of the measure. Factor analyses suggested that the 16-item scale retained its bifactor model. Convergent validity was supported through associations with additional measures, namely, the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ) and the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), which were used as reference criteria. Potential utility of the measure and future directions for ongoing development are discussed.
AlivizatosN. (1999). A new role for the Greek church?Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 17(1), 23–40.
2.
BaumgartnerH.HomburgC. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 139–161.
3.
BishopB. (2018). Advocating for atheist clients in the counseling profession. Counseling and Values, 63, 17–30. doi:10.1002/cvj.12070
4.
Brewer-SmythK.KoenigH. G. (2014). Could spirituality and religion promote stress resilience in survivors of childhood trauma?Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 35, 251–256. doi:10.3109/01612840.2013.873101
5.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
ByrneB. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
7.
ColemanT. J. I.HoodR. W. J.StreibH. (2018). An introduction to atheism, agnosticism, and nonreligious worldviews. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10, 203–206. doi:10.1037/rel0000213
8.
ConnorK. M.DavidsonJ. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18, 76–82. doi:10.1002/da.10113
9.
CragunR. T.HammerJ. H.NielsenM. (2015). The NonReligious-NonSpiritual Scale (NRNSS): Measuring everyone from atheists to zionists. Science, Religion & Culture, 2(3), 36–53. doi:10.17582/journal.src/2015/2.3.36.53
10.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
11.
CurrierJ. M.DrescherK. D.HarrisJ. I. (2014). Spiritual functioning among veterans seeking residential treatment for PTSD: A matched control group study. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 1(1), 3–15. doi:10.1037/scp0000004
12.
de Jager MeezenbroekE.GarssenB.van den BergM.van DierendonckD.VisseA.SchaufeliW. B. (2012). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: A review of spirituality questionnaires. Journal of Religion and Health, 51(2), 336–354. doi:10.1007/s10943-010-9376-1
DimitriadouD.StalikasA. (2012). Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). In StalikasA.TrilivaS.RoussiP. (Eds.), Psychometric instruments in Greece (2nd ed., p. 717). Athens, Greece: Pedio.
15.
EmmonsR. A. (1999). Religion in the psychology of personality: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 67, 873–888.
16.
GorsuchR. L.McPhersonS. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: Scientific, I/E—Revised and single item scales. Journal for the Study of Religion, 28, 348–354.
17.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
18.
KapuscinskiA. N.MastersK. S. (2010). The current status of measures of spirituality: A critical review of scale development. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 191–205. doi:10.1037/a0020498
19.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
LavrakasP. J. (2008). Double-barreled question. In LavrakasP. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781412963947
21.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A Test of Missing Completely at Random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(404), 1198–1202. doi: 10.2307/2290157
22.
LiuD. W. Y.Fairweather-SchmidtA. K.BurnsR. A.RobertsR. M. (2014). The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: Establishing invariance between gender across the lifespan in a large community based study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 340–348. doi:10.1007/s10862-014-9452-z
23.
LunV. M. C.BondM. H. (2013). Examining the relation of religion and spirituality to subjective well-being across national cultures. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 304–315. doi:10.1037/a0033641
24.
MarangudakisM.RontosK.XenitidouM. (2013). State crisis and civil consciousness in Greece (GreeSE: Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe, 77). Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/53727/1/GreeSE No77.pdf
25.
Molokotos-LiedermanL. (2003). Identity crisis: Greece, orthodoxy, and the European Union. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 18(3), 291–315. doi:10.1080/13537900310001601677
26.
MrdjenovichA. J. (2019). Religiously/spiritually involved, but in doubt or disbelief—Why? Healthy?Journal of Religion and Health, 58(5), 1488–1515. doi:10.1007/s10943-018-0711-2
27.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292.
28.
Pew Research Centre. (2018). Eastern and Western Europeans differ on importance of religion, views of minorities, and key social issues. Available from http://www.pewforum.org/
29.
PezirkianidisC.KarakasidouE.GalanakisM.StalikasA. (2016). Validation of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ) in a Greek sample. Psychology, 7, 1518–1530. doi:10.4236/psych.2016.713148
30.
SaroglouV. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 42, 1320–1340. doi:10.1177/0022022111412267
31.
SaucierG.SkrzypinskaK. (2006). Spiritual but not religious? Evidence for two independent dispositions. Journal of Personality, 74, 1257–1292. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00409.x
32.
SchnellT. (2015). Dimensions of Secularity (DoS): An open inventory to measure facets of secular identities. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 25, 272–292. doi:10.1080/10508619.2014.967541
33.
SevincK.MetinyurtT.ColemanT. (2017). What is nonbelief? An empirical research on the concept of nonbelief. Turkish Journal of Religious Education Studies, 4, 23–40.
34.
SilverC. F.ColemanT. J.HoodR. W.HolcombeJ. M. (2014). The six types of nonbelief: A qualitative and quantitative study of type and narrative. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 17, 990–1001. doi:10.1080/13674676.2014.987743
35.
Solano-FloresG.BackhoffE.Contreras-NiñoL. Á. (2009). Theory of test translation error. International Journal of Testing, 9, 78–91. doi:10.1080/15305050902880835
36.
StalikasA.KyriazosT. A.YotsidiV.PrassaK. (2018). Using bifactor EFA, bifactor CFA and exploratory structural equation modeling to validate factor structure of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire, Greek version. Psychology, 9, 348–371. doi:10.4236/psych.2018.93022
37.
StegerM. F.FrazierP.OishiS.KalerM. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
38.
TabeiS. Z.ZareiN.JoulaeiH. (2016). The impact of spirituality on health. Shiraz E Medical Journal, 17(6), e39053. doi:10.17795/semj39053
39.
TsironisC. N. (2012). Οι έρευνες για τη θρησκευτικότητα στη σύγχρονη Ελλάδα. Επιστημολογικά προλεγόμενα [Research on religiosity in contemporary Greece. A preface on epistemology]. Culture and Research, 1, 67–82.
40.
Van CappellenP.FredricksonB. L.SaroglouV.CorneilleO. (2017). Religiosity and the motivation for social affiliation. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 24–31. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.065
41.
Van de VijverF.HambletonR. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
