The development of the defence of non-pathological incapacity reflects a movement towards recognizing that an accused person should not be punished unless he or she is indeed blameworthy. This is furthermore consistent with the rights to dignity, and freedom and security of the person, set out in the Bill of Rights. However, policy concerns about the availability of a defence based on provocation or emotional stress have been raised. The development of the defence in this context and its apparent, but as yet uncertain, demise in the wake of the judgement of the Supreme Court of Appeal in S v Eadie is examined in this article, which provides an overview of the issues animating this area of law.
BurchellE. M.MiltonJ. R. L.BurchellJ. M. (1983). South African criminal law and procedure: General principles of criminal law (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
2.
BurchellJ. M. (2016). Principles of criminal law (5th ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
3.
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.
4.
Criminal Procedure Act 51 of1977.
5.
De WetJ. C. (1985). De Wet en Swanepoel Strafreg (4th ed.). Durban, South Africa: Butterworth.
6.
Director of Public Prosecutions, Grahamstown v Peli2018 (2) SACR 1 (SCA).
7.
Director of Public Prosecutions, Tvl v Venter2009 (1) SACR 165 (SCA).
8.
HoctorS. V. (2004). Dignity, criminal law and the bill of rights. South African Law Journal, 121, 304–317.
9.
HoctorS. V. (2008). A peregrination through the law of provocation. In JoubertJ. J. (Ed.), Essays in honour of CR Snyman (pp. 110–168). Pretoria, South Africa: Unisa Press.
10.
HoctorS. V. (2010). Amnesia and criminal responsibility. In KiddM. A.HoctorS. V. (Eds.), Stella Iuris: Celebrating 100 years of teaching law in Pietermaritzburg (pp. 349–363). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
11.
HoctorS. V. (2011). Tracing the origins of the defence of non-pathological incapacity in South African criminal law. Fundamina, 17, 70–82.
12.
HoctorS. V. (2017). Criminal law. In JoubertW. A. (Ed.), The law of South Africa (Vol. 11, pp. 1–444, 3rd ed.). Durban, South Africa: LexisNexis.
13.
JoubertJ. J.GeldenhuysT.SwanepoelJ. P.TerblancheS. S.Van der MerweS. E. (2014). Criminal procedure handbook (11th ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
14.
KeilerJ. (2016). Actus reus and mens rea – The elements of crime and the framework of criminal liability. In KeilerJ.RoefD. (Ed.), Comparative concepts of criminal law (pp. 57–70, 2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Intersentia.
15.
KempG. P.WalkerS.PalmerR.BaqwaD.GeversC.LeslieB.SteynbergA. (2018). Criminal law in South Africa (3rd ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.
16.
LouwR. (2001). S v Eadie: Road rage, incapacity and legal confusion. South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 206–216.
17.
OrmerodD.LairdK. (2018). Smith, Hogan, and Ormerod’s criminal law (15th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
RamrajV. V. (2002). Freedom of the person and the principles of criminal fault. South African Journal on Human Rights, 18, 225–258.
19.
Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Responsibility of Mentally Deranged Persons and Related Matters RP 69/1967.
20.
Rex v Blom1939 AD 188.
21.
SchwikkardP. J.Van der MerweS. E. (2009). Principles of evidence (3rd ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
22.
SnymanC. R. (2003). The tension between legal theory and policy considerations in the general principles of the criminal law. Acta Juridica, 1, 1–22.
23.
SnymanC. R. (2014). Criminal law (6th ed.). Durban, South Africa: LexisNexis.
24.
State v Arnold1985 (3) SA 256 (C).
25.
State v Bailey1982 (3) SA 772 (A).
26.
State v Beukes2003 JDR 0788 (T).
27.
State v Chretien1981 (1) SA 1097 (A).
28.
State v Engelbrecht2005 (2) SACR 41 (W).
29.
State v Eadie2002 (1) SACR 663 (SCA).
30.
State v Gesualdo1997 (2) SACR 68 (W).
31.
State v Hughes2004 JDR 0263 (T).
32.
State v Ingram1995 (1) SACR 1 (A).
33.
State v Kalogoropoulos1993 (2) SACR 12 (A).
34.
State v Kensley1995 (2) SACR 646 (A).
35.
State v Laubscher1988 (2) SA 163 (A).
36.
State v Longano2017 (1) SACR 380 (KZP).
37.
State v Marx [2009] 1 All SA 499 (E).
38.
State v Mathe2014 (2) SACR 298 (KZD).
39.
State v Moses1996 (1) SACR 701 (C).
40.
State v Ngobe2004 JDR 0216 (T).
41.
State v Nursingh1995 (2) SACR 331 (D).
42.
State v Oosthuizen2018 JDR 0725 (SCA).
43.
State v Ramdass2017 (1) SACR 30 (KZD).
44.
State v Scholtz2006 (1) SACR 442 (E).
45.
State v Van der Sandt1998 (2) SACR 627 (W).
46.
State v Van der Westhuizen2011 (2) SACR 26 (SCA).
47.
State v Van Vuuren1983 (2) SA 12 (A).
48.
State v Volkman2005 (2) SACR 402 (C).
49.
State v Wiid1990 (2) SACR 561 (A).
50.
TerblancheS. S. (2016). A guide to sentencing in South Africa (3rd ed.). Durban, South Africa: LexisNexis.
