The Child Justice Act of 2008 has set the minimum age for criminal capacity at 10 years with a rebuttable presumption of criminal incapacity between the ages of 10 and 14 years. The legislation requires that expert evidence be led (by clinical psychologists or psychiatrists) in order to assist the court to determine whether accused children and adolescents between 10 and 14 years of age can be held criminally responsible. The Child Justice Act requires an examination of the cognitive, moral, emotional, psychological, and social development of the accused child/adolescent. This article critically examines the neuroscience literature on brain development, decision-making and moral development in children and adolescents as it relates to legal prescripts inherent in the Child Justice Act, in particular with regard to accused children and adolescents’ understanding of the wrongfulness of an act, and their ability to act in accordance with that understanding.
AndersonV.AndersonP.NorthamE.JacobsR.CatroppaC. (2001). Development of executive functions through late childhood and adolescence in an Australian sample. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 385–406.
2.
AronsonJ. D. (2007). Brain imaging, culpability, and the juvenile death penalty. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 115, 136–137.
3.
AronsonJ. D. (2009). Neuroscience and Juvenile Justice. Akron Law Review, 42, 917–930.
4.
CaseyB. J.GieddJ. N.ThomasK. M. (2000). Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development. Biological Psychology, 54, 241–257.
5.
CaseyB.J.JonesR.M.SomervilleL.H. (2011). Braking and accelerating of the adolescent brain. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 21–33.
6.
CheinJ.AlbertD.O’BrienL.UckertK.SteinbergL. (2011). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14(2), F1–F10.
7.
De Oliveira-SouzaR.MollJ. (2009). The neural basis of normal and deviant moral cognition and behaviour. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 20, 261–270.
8.
EslingerP. J.Robinson-LongM.RealmutoJ.MollG.deOliveira-SouzaR.Tovar-MollF.WangJ.YangQ. X. (2009). Developmental frontal lobe imaging in moral judgment: Arthur Benton’s enduring influence 60 years later. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(2), 158–169.
9.
EslingerP. J.GrattanL. M.DamaisoH.AntonioM. D.DamaisoM. D. (1992). Developmental consequences of childhood frontal lobe damage. Archives of Neurology, 49, 764–769.
10.
FignerB.MackinlayR. J.WilkeningF.WeberE. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 709–730.
11.
GalvanA. (2010). Adolescent development of the reward system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4(6), 1–9.
12.
GieddJ. N. (2008). The teen brain: Insights from neuroimaging. Journal of Adolescent Mental Health, 42, 335–343.
13.
GieddJ. N.BlumenthalJ.JeffriesN. O.CastellanosF. X.LiuH.ZijdenbosA.. . .RapoportJ. L. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Neuroscience, 2, 861–863.
14.
GilliganC.AttanucciJ. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223–237.
15.
GreenS.RalphM. A.MollJ.StamatakisE. A.GrafmanJ.ZahnR. (2010). Selective functional integration between anterior temporal and distinct fronto-mesolimbic regions during guilt and indignation. Neuroimage, 52, 1720–1726.
16.
GreeneJ. D. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgement explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 322–324.
17.
GreeneJ. D.NystromL. E.EngellA. D.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2004). The neural basis of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgement. Neuron, 44, 389–400.
18.
GreeneJ. D.SommervilleR. B.NystromL. E.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
19.
GrosbrasM.JansenM.LeonardG.McIntoshA.OsswaldK.PoulsenC.. . .PausT. (2007). Neural mechanisms of resistance to peer influence in early adolescence. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 8040–8045.
20.
JohnsonS. B.BlumR. W.GieddJ. N. (2009). Adolescent maturity and the brain: The promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 216–221.
21.
KohlbergL. (1963). The development of children’s orientation toward a moral order. Vita Humana, 6, 11–33.
22.
KohlbergL. (1969). Level of moral development as a determinant of preference and comprehension of moral judgements made by others. Journal of Personality, 37, 225–252.
23.
KohlbergL.CandeeD. (1984). The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. In KohlbergL. (Ed.), Essays in moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development (pp. 498–581). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
24.
KrebsD. L.DentonK. (2005). Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: A critical evaluation of Kohlberg’s model. Psychological Review, 112, 629–649.
25.
KrebsD. L.DentonK. (2006). Explanatory limitations of cognitive-developmental approaches to Morality. Psychological review, 113, 672–675.
26.
KrebsD. L.DentonK. L.VermeulenS. C.CarpendaleJ. I.BushA. (1991). Structural flexibility of moral thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1012–1023.
27.
KrettenauerT.ColasanteT.BuchmannM.MaltiT. (2014). The development of moral emotions and decision making from adolescence to early adulthood: A 6 year longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 583–596.
28.
KurtinesW.GriefE. B. (1974). The development of moral thought: Review and evaluation of Kohlberg’s approach. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 453–470.
29.
LenrootR. H.GieddJ. N. (2006). Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 718–729.
30.
LunaB.PadmanabhanA.O’HearnK. (2010). What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence?Brain and Cognition, 72, 101–113.
31.
McArthur Foundation Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. (2006). Less guilty by reason of adolescence. Retrieved from http://.adjj.org?downloads/6093issue_brief_3.pdf
32.
MidsonB. (2012). Risky business: Developmental neuroscience and the culpability of young killers. Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law, 19, 692–710.
33.
MollJ.De Oliviera-SouzaR.EslingerP. J.BramatiI. E.Murao-MirandaJ.AndreiuloA.PessoaL. (2002). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2(7), 2730–2736.
34.
MollJ.De Oliveira-SouzaR. (2007). Moral judgements, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 319–321.
35.
MollJ.De Oliveira-SouzaR.GarridoG. J.BramatiI. E.Caparelli-DacquerE. M. A.PaivaM. L. M.F.. . . GrafmanJ. (2007). The self as moral agent: Linking the neural bases of social agency and moral sensitivity. Social Neuroscience, 2, 336–352.
36.
MollJ.De Oliveira-SouzaR.ZahnR. (2008). The neural basis of moral cognition: Sentiments, concepts and values. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 161–180.
37.
MollJ.ZahnR.De-Oliviera-SouzaR.KruegerF.GrafmanJ. (2005). Opinion: The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 6, 799–809.
38.
NarvaezD.VaydichJ. L. (2008). Moral development and behaviour under the spotlight of the neurobiological sciences. Journal of Moral Education, 37, 289–312.
39.
NewtonN. C.BusseyK. (2011). The age of reason: An examination of psychosocial factors involved in delinquent behaviour. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17, 75–88. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2010.02004.x
40.
NordinR.MousaviS.ShapieeR. (2012). The minimum age of criminal responsibility and Iranian law: A comparative study. The Social Sciences, 7, 797–806.
41.
O’BrienL.AlbertD.ChienJ.SteinbergL. (2011). Adolescents prefer more immediate rewards when in the presence of their peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 747–753.
42.
PaulsenD. J.HallquistM. N.GeierC. F.LunaB. (2015). Effects of incentives, age, and behaviour on brain activation during inhibitory control: A longitudinal fMRI study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 105–115.
43.
PausT. (2005). Mapping brain maturation and cognitive development during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 60–68.
44.
PiagetJ. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
45.
PillayA. L.WillowsC. (2015). Assessing the criminal capacity of children: A challenge to the capacity of mental health professionals. Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 27, 91–101.
46.
PoldrackR. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–65.
47.
Republic of South Africa. (2008). Child Justice Act No. 75 of 2008. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Gazette.
48.
RybergJ. (2014). Punishing adolescents – On immaturity and diminished responsibility. Neuroethics, 7, 327–336.
49.
ScottE. S.RepucciN. D.WoolardJ. L. (1995). Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contexts. Law and Human behaviour, 19, 221–244.
50.
SmithA. R.ChienJ. C.SteinbergL. (2014). Peers increase adolescent risk taking even when the probabilities of negative outcomes are known. Developmental Psychology, 50, 5), 1564–1568.
51.
SmithA. R.SteinbergL.StrangN.ChienJ. (2015). Age differences in the impact of peers on adolescents’ and adults’ neural response to reward. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 75–82.
52.
SobenskyW. E. (1983). The effects of situational factors on moral judgements. Child Development, 54, 575–584.
53.
SowellE. R.ThompsonP. M.HolmesC. J.JerniganT. L.TogaA. W. (1999). In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Neuroscience, 2, 859–861.
54.
SpearL. P. (2000). The adolescent brain and age-related behavioural manifestations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 417–463.
55.
SteinbergL.ScottE. S. (2003). Less guilty by reason of adolescence developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty. American Psychologist, 58(12), 1009–1018.
56.
SteinbergL. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 69–74.
57.
SteinbergL. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106.
58.
SteinbergL. (2010). A behavioural scientist looks at the science of adolescent brain development. Brain and Cognition, 72, 160–164.
59.
SteinbergL. (2013). Does recent research on adolescent brain development inform the mature minor doctrine?Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38, 256–267.
60.
SteinbergL.CauffmanE. (1996). Maturity of judgement in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human behaviour, 20, 249–272.
61.
SteinbergL.CauffmanE.WoolardJ.GrahamS.BanichM. (2009). Are adolescents less mature than adults? Minors’ access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA ‘flip-flop’. American Psychologist, 64, 583–594.
62.
TaylorS. J.BarkerL. A.HeaveyL.McHaleS. (2013). The typical trajectory of social and executive functions in late adolescence and early childhood. Developmental psychology, 49, 1253–1265.
63.
TurielE. (2008). The development of children’s orientations toward moral, social, and personal orders: More than a sequence in development. Human Development, 51, 21–39.
64.
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2007, April25). General comment no. 10 (2007): Children’s Rights in Juvenile Justice (CRC/C/GC/10). Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/4670fca12.html
65.
UrbasG. (2000). The age of criminal responsibility (Australian Institute of Criminology: Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice). Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Australian Institute of Criminology.
66.
VelanovaK.WheelerM. E.LunaB. (2008). Maturational changes in anterior cingulate and frontoparietal recruitment support the development of error processing and inhibitory control. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2505–2522.
67.
WahlstromD.CollinsP.WhiteT.MonicaL. (2010). Developmental changes in dopamine neurotransmission in adolescence: Behavioral implications and issues in assessment. Brain and Cognition, 72, 146–159.
68.
WarkG. R.KrebsD. L. (1996). Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judgement. Developmental Psychology, 32, 220–230.
69.
WarkG. R.KrebsD. L. (2000). The construction of moral dilemmas in everyday life. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 5–21.
70.
WeisbergD. S.KeilF. C.GoodsteinJ.RawsonE.GrayJ. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470–477.
71.
WestenD.BlagovP. S.HarenskiK.KiltsC.HamannS. (2006). Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgement in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1947–1958.
