Originally developed by Glaser and Strauss, grounded theory is a useful research method for researchers aiming to generate novel theory as it emerges from data gathered and analysed. However, this method is not utilised extensively, and when it is applied, it often leaves researchers confused as to its utility. This article addresses the origins of grounded theory while also informing readers of some of the difficulties regarding this research method. These difficulties arise as a result of the fundamental contentions presented by Glaser and Strauss in their theoretical and methodological divorce from each other and their original grounded theory approach. Illustrative examples of the issues related to the selection of a grounded theory method are presented in relation to a study that relied on the Straussian grounded theory approach to account for the meanings of HIV prophylactic Voluntary Medical Adult Male Circumcision in South Africa.
AdlerN.KegelesS. M.GenevroJ. L. (1992). Risk taking in health. In YatesJ. F. (Ed.), Risk taking behaviour (pp. 232–233). London, England: John Wiley.
2.
AuvertB.MarseilleE.KorenrompE. L.Lloyd-SmithJ.SittaR.TaljaardD.. . .KahnJ. G. (2008). Estimating the resources needed and savings anticipated from roll-out of adult male circumcision in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE, 3, e2679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002679
3.
AuvertB.TaljaardD.LagardeE.Sobngwi-TambekouJ.SittaR.PurenA. (2005). Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: The ANRS 1265 trial. Public Library of Science, 2(11), 298–308.
4.
AuvertB.TaljaardD.RechD.LissoubaP.SinghB.BouscaillouJ.LewisD. (2013). Association of the ANRS-12126 male circumcision project with HIV levels among men in a South African township: Evaluation of effectiveness using cross-sectional surveys. PLoS Medicine, 10, e1001509.
5.
BenolielJ. Q. (1996). Grounded theory and nursing knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 406–428.
6.
BurnardP. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11, 461–466.
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, England: SAGE.
CharmazK.McMullenL. M. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
CutcliffeJ. R. (2000). Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1476–1484.
11.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000).Target article: The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 11, 227–268.
12.
GlaserB. G. (1999). Keynote address from the fourth annual qualitative health research conference. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 836–845.
13.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1965). Awareness of dying. Chicago, IL: Aldine Atherton.
14.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1971). Status passage. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15.
GouldingC. (1998). Grounded theory: The missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1(1), 50–57.
16.
HarryB.SturgesK. M.KlingnerJ. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of the process and challenge of grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3–13.
17.
Howard-PayneL. (2015). The methodological implications of relying upon fieldworkers for qualitative health psychology research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(2). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs150239
18.
IzzoA. (2003). Verstehen and the unconscious: A historical overview. In BoudonR.CherkaouiM.DemeulenaereP. (Eds.), The European tradition in qualitative research (pp. 393–408). London, England: SAGE.
KahnJ. G.MarseilleE.AuvertB. (2006). Cost-effectiveness of male circumcision for HIV prevention in a South African setting. Public Library of Science Medicine, 3, 2349–2358.
22.
KalerA. (2004). AIDS-talk in everyday life: The presence of HIV/AIDS in men’s informal conversation in Southern Malawi. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 285–297.
23.
KendallJ. (1999). Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21, 743–757.
24.
KepeT. (2010). ‘Secrets’ that kill: Crisis, custodianship and responsibility in ritual male circumcision in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 729–735.
25.
LayderD. (1982). Grounded theory: A constructive critique. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 12, 101–123.
26.
LayderD. (1993). New strategies in social research: An introduction & guide. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
27.
LockeK. (1996). Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years?Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 239–245.
28.
MadillA.JordanA.ShirleyC. (2000). Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 1–20.
29.
MathewW. (2012). Cutting into perceptions: Investigating men’s understanding of protection – Through medical male circumcision for HIV prevention, in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal (MA dissertation). Centre for Communication, Media & Society, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
30.
MbitoM. N.MaliaJ. A. (2009). Transfer of the Kenyan Kikuyu male circumcision ritual to future generations living in the United States. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 39–53.
31.
McGheeG.MarlandG. R.AtkinsonJ. (2007). Grounded theory research: Literature reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60, 334–342.
32.
MehtaS. D.MosesS.AgotK.Odoyo-JuneE.LiH.MacleanI.BaileyR. C. (2013). The long-term efficacy of medical male circumcision against HIV acquisition. AIDS, 27, 2899–2907.
33.
MeliaK. M. (1996). Rediscovering Glaser. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 368–378.
34.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
MillerS. I.FredericksM. (1999). How does grounded theory explain?Qualitative Health Research, 9, 538–551.
36.
MillsJ.ChapmanY.BonnerA.FrancisK. (2007). Grounded theory: A methodological spiral from positivism to postmodernism. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58, 72–79.
37.
MkandawireP.DixonJ.LuginaahI.ArmahF.ArkuG. (2014). ‘At risk by fact of birth’: Perceptions and concerns about medical male circumcision for HIV prevention in northern Malawi. Health, Risk & Society, 16, 295–307.
38.
PeltzerK.KantaX. (2009). Medical circumcision and manhood initiation rituals in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: A post intervention evaluation. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11, 83–97.
39.
RosenstockI. M.StrecherV. J.BeckerM. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education, 15, 175–183.
40.
SasakiJ. Y.KimH. S. (2011). At the intersection of culture and religion: A cultural analysis of religion’s implications for secondary control and social affiliation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 101, 401–414.
41.
SiegfriedN.MullerM.VolminkJ.DeeksJ. J.EggerM.LowN. N.WilliamsonP. R. (2003). Male circumcision for prevention of heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men. Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 3, CD003362. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003362
42.
SiegfriedN.MullerM.VolminkJ.DeeksJ. J.EggerM.LowN. N.WilliamsonP. R. (2005). HIV and male circumcision – A systematic review with assessment of the quality of studies. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 5, 165–173.
43.
StraussA. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
45.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47.
TobianA. A.GrayR. H. (2011). The medical benefits of male circumcision. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 306, 1479–1480.
48.
TweedA.CharmazK. (2012). Grounded theory methods for mental health practitioners. In HarperD.ThompsonA. R. (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 131–146). London, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
49.
WassermanJ. A.ClairJ. M.WilsonK. L. (2009). Problematics of grounded theory: Innovations for developing an increasingly rigorous qualitative method. Qualitative Research, 9, 355–381.
50.
WilsonH. S.HutchinsonS. A. (1996). Methodologic mistakes in grounded theory. Nursing Research, 45, 122–124.
51.
WimpennyP.GassJ. (2000). Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: Is there a difference?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1485–1492.
52.
WolfswinkelJ. F.FurtmuellerE.WilderomC. P. (2011). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22, 45–55.
