Nineteen newly certified Association for Clinical Pastoral Education (ACPE) Associate Supervisors were interviewed to determine how they learned to do Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE) supervision. Grounded theory was the qualitative research method used in gathering and analyzing data for this IRB approved study. The emerging theory, Mutually Engaged Supervisory Processes, includes nine processes: Discerning Vocation, Feedback, Support, Supervisory Practices and Identity, Theory, Increased Awareness, Shift in Personhood, Offering Presence, and Owning Authority. Member checks confirmed the trustworthiness of the results.
DerricksonP. E. (1988). Supervisory training: A consortium model. Journal of Supervison and Training in Ministry, 10, 19–28.
5.
FalenderC. A.CornishJ. A. E.GoodyearR.HatcherR.KaslowN. J.LeventhalG.GrusC. (2004). Defining competencies in psychology supervision: A consensus statement. Journal Of Clinical Psychology, 60(7), 771–785.
6.
FarnanJ. M. (2012). A Systematic Review The Effect of Clinical Supervision on Patient and Residency Education Outcomes. Academic medicine, Publish Ahead of Print, 1. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824822cc
7.
FitchettG. (1998–1999). CPE and spiritual growth. Journal of Supervision and Training in Ministry, 19, 130–146.
8.
FowlerJ. W. (1981). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning (1st ed.). San Francisco: Harper & Row.
9.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Chicago,: Aldine Pub. Co.
10.
GreinerL. B., & BendiksenR. (1994). Conceptual learning in Clinical Pastoral Education supervisory training: A focus-group research project with recommendations. Journal of Pastoral Care, 48(3), 245–256.
11.
HallC. E. (1992). Head and heart: The story of the clinical pastoral education movement. Decatur, Ga.: Journal of Pastoral Care Publications.
12.
HallT. W., & EdwardsK. J. (2002). The Spiritual Assessment Inventory: A Theistic Model and Measure for Assessing Spiritual Development. [Article]. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(2), 341–357.
13.
KadushinG.BergerC.GilbertC., & de St. AubinM. (2009). Models and Methods in Hospital Social Work Supervision. [Article]. Clinical Supervisor, 28(2), 180–199. doi: 10.1080/07325220903324660
14.
KeganR. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
15.
MilneD. L.SheikhA. I.PattisonS., & WilkinsonA. (2011). Evidence-Based Training for Clinical Supervisors: A Systematic Review of 11 Controlled Studies. [Article]. Clinical Supervisor, 30(1), 53–71. doi: 10.1080/07325223.2011.564955
RagsdaleJ. R.HollowayE. L., & IvyS. S. (2009). Educating CPE supervisors: A grounded theory study. The Journal Of Pastoral Care & Counseling: JPCC, 63 (3–4), 10-11-14.
18.
RobinsonJ. E., & NeedhamM. A. (1991). Racial and gender myths as key factors in pastoral supervision. Journal of Pastoral Care, XLV(4), 333–342.
19.
ScrivenerW. E. (2004). Competence in supervision: Reflections of a former chair. Journal of Supervision and Training in Ministry, 24, 19–32.
20.
SeverinssonE. I. (2001). Confirmation, Meaning and Self-Awareness as Core Concepts of the Nursing Supervision Model. Nursing Ethics, 8(1), 36–44. doi: 10.1191/096973301666447036
21.
ThorntonE. E. (1970). Professional education for ministry a history of clinical pastoral education. Nashville,: Abingdon Press.
22.
ThorstensonT. C.BestM.GibbonsJ.HayesM. B.KeeseP.Oberwise-LacockM., & ShepardK. (2006). The Presidential Task Group on Supervisory Education and Certification. Unpublished: Association for Clinical Pastoral Education.
