This article attempts to draw attention to the interpersonal interactions of African migrants and to how the relational quality, namely, flexibility/rigidity, could potentially facilitate or limit their acculturation in South Africa. The study on which the article is based is part of a larger international research project on the commonalities and differences in the way that intergenerational relations, citizenship and belonging play out in three countries: The United Kingdom, France and South Africa. Ten families and 24 individual participants (men and women in the age range 18–59) from different African countries who had migrated to South Africa were selected through purposive sampling. The data were obtained through in-depth personal interviews that were thematically analysed using a secondary data analysis approach. Although more relational qualities would provide a comprehensive description of migrants' interpersonal styles, the relational quality of flexibility/rigidity of migrants who participated in this research, ranged on a continuum from being too flexible to being too close and some were in between. Migrants who were flexible could associate themselves with the new cultural and social environment and expand their behavioural repertoire. The migrants in the study, who were too flexible and too close, experienced discomfort. The study findings can be used as baseline for further research to support the adjustment of migrants in South Africa.
AkhtarS.ChoiL. W. (2004). When evening falls: The immigrant's encounter with middle and old age. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 183–191. doi: 10.1023/B:TAJP.0000027272.64645.f2.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
3.
BerryJ. W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In PadillaA. M. (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings (pp. 9–25). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
4.
BerryJ. W. (2005) Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 697–712.
5.
BerryJ. W. (2008). Globalisation and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 328–336.
6.
BerryJ. W.KalinR. (1995). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27, 310–320.
7.
BeukesM.RoosV.VorsterC. (2012). Directions for the future training of psychotherapists: An interpersonal approach. Journal of Psychology in Africa, submitted.
8.
BhatiaS.RamA. (2009). Theorizing identity in transnational and diaspora cultures. A critical approach to acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 140–149.
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 101191/1478088706qp0630a.
10.
BurnsN.GroveS. K. (2005). The practice of nursing research. Conduct, critique & utilization (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders.
11.
ChirkovV. (2009). Summary of the criticism and of the potential ways to improve acculturation psychology. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 177–180.
12.
CortiL.BishopL. (2005). Strategies in teaching secondary analysis of qualitative data. Forum Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung. FQS 6(1), Art. 47. Retrieved from http://www.Qualitative-research.Net/fqs.
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach. London, England. Sage.
14.
CrushJ.RamachandranS. (2010). Xenophobia, International Migration and Development. Journal of Human Development and capabilities, 11, 209–228.
15.
DodgeJ.OspinaS. M.FoldyE. G. (2005). Integrating Rigor and Relevance in Public Administration Scholarship: The Contribution of Narrative Inquiry. Public Administration Review, 65, 286–300.
16.
DodsonB. (2010). Locating Xenophobia: Debate, Discourse, and Everyday Experience in Cape Town, South Africa. Africa Today, 56, 2–22.
17.
DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.GaertnerS. L. (2000). Reducing contemporary prejudice: Combating explicit and implicit bias at the individual and intergroup level. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 137–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
Du PlessisE. (2007). A strategy to promote nurses' health research contribution in South Africa. Potchefstroom: North-West University. (PhD thesis).
19.
DurrheimK.DixonJ.A. (2004). Attitudes in the fiber of everyday life: The discourse of racial evaluation and the lived experience of desegregation. American Psychologist, 59, 626–636.
20.
EllingsonL. (2009). Engaging crystalization in qualitative research: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
GibsonM. A. (2001). Immigrant adaptation and patterns of acculturation. Human Development, 44, 19–23. doi: 10.1159/000057037.
22.
GiovanniniD.VezzaliL. (2011). Contact with Immigrant Parents as a Predictor of Teachers' Attitudes and Acculturation Orientations toward Immigrant Children. International Journal about Parents in Education, 5, 65–67.
23.
GuidanoV. F. (1991). The self in process. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
HillA.WatsonJ.RiversD.JoyceM. (2007). Key themes in interpersonal communication. Berkshire. England: Open University Press.
25.
JacksonD. D. (1965). The study of the family. Family Process, 4, 1–20.
26.
LebedevaN.TatarkoA. (2004). Socio-psychological factors of ethnic intolerance in Russia's multicultural regions. In SetiadiB.SupratiknyaA.LonnerW.PoortingaY. (Eds.), Ongoing Themes in Psychology and Culture. Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Congress of IACCP (pp. 507–537). Jarkata: Indonesian University Press.
27.
Marchetti-MercerM. C.RoosJ. L. (2006). Migration and exile ? some implications for mental health ifl post-apartheid South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 12, 52–57.
28.
NelsonG.PrilleltenskyI. (2005). Community Psychology. In Pursuit of Liberation and well-being. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
NiewenhuisJ. (2007). Introducing qualitative research. In MareeK. (Ed.), First steps in research (pp. 46–68). Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik.
30.
PiontkowskiU.RohmanA.FlorackA. (2002). Concordance of acculturation attitudes and perceived threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 221–232.
31.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
32.
PopeC.ZieblandS.MaysN. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. Qualitative Research in health care. British Medical Journal, 320, 114–116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.32037227.114.
33.
PortesA.RumbautR. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
PortesA.RumbautR. G. (2006). Immigrant America: A portrait (3rd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35.
RademeyerC.WagnerC.CassimjeeN. (2009). A Systemic study of South African emigrants' experience of the Canadian environment. South African Geographical Journal, 91, 84–93.
36.
RenzahoA. M. N.BurnsC. (2006). Post-migration food habits of sub-Saharan African migrants in Victoria: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Dietitians Association of Australia, 63, 91–102.
RogersC. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 21, 95–103.
39.
RohmannA.FlorackA.PiontkowskiU. (2006). The role of discordant acculturation attitudes in perceived threat: An analysis of host and immigrant attitudes in Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 683–702.
40.
RumbautR. G. (2008). Reaping what you sow: Immigration, youth, and reactive ethnicity. Applied Developmental Science, 12, 108–111.doi: 10.1080/10888690801997341.
41.
SchwartzS. J.UngerJ. B.ZamboangaB. L.SzapocznikJ. (2010). Rethinking the concept of acculturation: Implications for theory and research. American Psychologist, 65, 237–251. doi: 1037/AOO19330.H.
42.
TadmorC. T.TetlockP. E.PengK. (2009). Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity: The cognitive implications of biculturalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 105–139. doi: 10.1177/0022022108326279.
43.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between Intergroup Contact and Prejudice among Minority and Majority Status Groups. American Psychological Society, 16, 951–957.
44.
VorsterC. (2011). Impact: The Story of Interactional Therapy (1st ed.). Pretoria, South Africa: Satori Publishers.
45.
WatzlawickP.BavelasJ.B.JacksonD.D. (2011). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
