Community development is critical in South African and other low- to middle-income contexts characterised by unemployment, violence, poverty and poor infrastructure. The current asset-based trend in community research emphasises constructive community development and change through the mobilisation of existing and unrecognised community resources and skills. Following this trend we critically examine the conceptual soundness and logic of asset-based community assessment instruments. We give particular attention to measures of social capital, social cohesion, community resilience, and sense of community. Our review reveals that while the asset-based approaches embody an important shift away from the deficits orientation, their associated instruments, which bring discursive impositions, are marked by conceptual and operational ambiguities, troubling assumptions about community and uneasy power dynamics in their implementation. We suggest that such challenges may be addressed through the employment of measures that draw on both quantitative and qualitative paradigms, and that assume participatory strategies to implementation.
AhernM. M.HendryxM. S.SiddharthanK. (1996). The importance of sense of community on people's perceptions of their health-care experiences. Medical Care, 34, 911–923.
2.
AhmedR.SeedatM.van NiekerkA.BulbuliaS. (2004). Discerning community resilience in disadvantaged communities in the context of violence and injury prevention. South African Journal of Psychology, 34, 386–408.
3.
Barnett-PageE.ThomasJ. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, 59–69.
4.
BollenK. A.HoyleR. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69, 479–504.
5.
De MarcoA.De MarcoM. (2010). Conceptualization and measurement of the neighbourhood in rural settings: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 99–114.
6.
Diez-RouxA. V. (2003). The examination of neighbourhood effects on health: Conceptual and methodological issues related to the presence of multiple levels of organization. In KawachiI.BerkmanL. F. (Eds.), Neighbourhoods and health (pp. 45–64). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
EcheverriaS. E.Diez-RouxA. V.LinkB. G. (2004). Reliability of self-reported neighbourhood characteristics. Journal of Urban Health, 81, 682–701.
8.
EllawayA.MacintyreS.KearnsA. (2001). Perceptions of place and health in socially contrasting neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38, 2299–2316.
9.
FitzsimmonsS. J.FerbT. E. (1977). Developing a community attitude assessment scale. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 356–378.
10.
ForrestC. J. (1998). Demystifying public environmental concerns: Implementing community assessments. Environmental Quality Management, 7, 55–68.
11.
FoxcroftC.PatersonH.Le RouxN.HerbstD. (2004). Psychological assessment in South Africa: A needs analysis.Pretoria, South Africa: HSRC.
12.
HarphamT.GrantE.ThomasE. (2002). Measuring social capital within health surveys: Key issues. Health Policy and Planning, 17, 106–111.
13.
HartnagelT. F. (1979). The perception and fear of crime: Implications for neighbourhood cohesion, social activity, and community affect. Social Forces, 58, 176–193.
14.
HawkinsJ. D.CatalanoM. A.ArthurM. W. (2002). Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviours, 27, 951–976.
15.
HippJ. R.PerrinA. (2006). Nested loyalties: Local networks' effects on neighbourhood and community cohesion. Urban Studies, 43, 2503–2523.
16.
HomanM. S. (2004). Promoting community change: Making it happen in the real world (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17.
KrishnaA.ShraderE. (1999). Social capital assessment tool. Conference on social capital and poverty reduction.Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
18.
LongD. A.PerkinsD. D. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sense of Community Index and development of a brief SCI. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 279–296.
19.
MathieA.CunninghamG. (2003). From clients to citizens: Asset-based community development as a strategy for community-driven development. Development in Practice, 13, 474–486.
20.
McMillanD. W.ChavisD. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.
21.
MurphyK. R.DavidhoferC. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (6th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
22.
KasigogoNgonyama T.HooperM.LongC.LykesM. B.WilsonK.ZietkiewiczE. (2004). Chasing rainbow notions: Enacting community psychology in the classroom and beyond in post-1994 South Africa. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 77–89.
23.
ObstP. L.WhiteK. M. (2004). Revisiting the Sense of Community Index: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 691–705.
24.
PatulnyR. V.SvendsenG. L. H. (2007). Exploring the social capital grid: Bonding, bridging, qualitative, quantitative. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27, 32–51.
25.
PortesA. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15, 1–12.
26.
PotterC.RrugerJ. (2003). Social programme evaluation. In SeedatM.DuncanN.LazarusS. (Eds.), Community psychology: Theory, method and practice. South African and other perspectives (pp. 189–211). Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.
27.
PronykP. M.HarphamT.BuszaJ.PhetlaG.MorisonL. A.HargreavesJ. R.PorterJ. D. (2008). Can social capital be intentionally generated? A randomized trial from rural South Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 1559–1570.
28.
PutnamR. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.
29.
RabkinJ. G. (1986). Mental health needs assessment: A review of methods. Medical Care, 24, 1093–1109.
30.
RappaportJ. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 121–148.
31.
SalisburyW. D.CarteT. A.ChidambaramL. (2006). Cohesion in virtual teams: Validating the Perceived Cohesion Scale in a distributed setting. ACM SIGMIS Database, 37, 147–155.
32.
SarasonS. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for community psychology.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
SasaoT.SueS. (1993). Toward a culturally anchored ecological framework of research in ethnic-cultural communities. American Journal of Psychology, 21, 705–727.
34.
SmithR. A. (1975). Neighbourhood cohesion: A review and some suggestions. Human Ecology, 3, 143–160.
35.
StalkerK. (1998). The antinomies of choice in community care. In BaldwinS. (Ed.), Needs assessment and community care: Clinical practice and policy making (pp. 89–98). Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.
36.
StanleyD. (2003). What do we know about social cohesion: The research perspective of the Federal Government's Social Cohesion Research Network. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28, 5–17.
37.
TuanT.HarphamT.ThuhuongN.De SilvaM.HuongThuy V. T.LongThap T.DewittD. (2005). Validity of a social capital measurement tool in Vietnam. Asian Journal of Social Science, 33, 208–222.
38.
VaiseyS. (2007). Structure, culture, and community: The search for belonging in 50 urban communities. American Sociological Review, 72, 851–873.
39.
ValentinA.SpangenbergJ. H. (2000). A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 381–392.
40.
WenM.HawkleyL. C.CacioppoJ. T. (2006). Objective and perceived neighbourhood environment, individual SES and psychosocial factors, and self-rated health: An analysis of older adults in Cook County, Illinois. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2575–2590.
