The research reported here tested the factor structure of a measure for sense of community in community organizations, and it evaluated sense of community's potential as an empowering organizational characteristic within an organizational empowerment framework. Randomly selected community organization participants (N = 561) were surveyed as part of a study of a substance abuse prevention initiative located in the northeastern United States. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the putative structure of the sense of community measure tailored to community organizations. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that community organization sense of community significantly predicted intrapersonal empowerment after controlling for demographics, participation, alienation, and other empowering organizational characteristic. Findings imply that organizational sense of community should be considered as an empowering organizational characteristic in community-based health education.
Altman, D.G., & Feighery, E. (2004). Future directions for youth empowerment: Commentary on application of youth empowerment theory to tobacco control. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 641-647.
2.
Arbuckle, J.L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user's guide. Chicago : Smallwaters.
3.
Bell, B., Gaventa, J., & Peters, J. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4.
Berger, P.L., & Neuhaus, R.J. (1977). To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
5.
Boyd, N.M., & Angelique, H. (2002). Rekindling the discourse: Organization studies in community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 3325-3348.
6.
Cheadle, A., Senter, S., Solomon, L., Beery, W.L., & Schwartz, P.M. (2005). A qualitative exploration of alternative strategies for building community health partnerships: Collaboration-versus issue-oriented approaches. Journal of Urban Health, 82, 638-652.
7.
Dean, D.G. (1961). Alienation: Its meaning and measurement. American Sociological Review, 26, 753-758.
8.
Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., & Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
9.
Griffith, D.M., Allen, J.O., Zimmerman, M.A., Morrel-Samuels, S., Reischl, T.M., Brooks, S.E., et al. (2005). The role of organizational empowerment in community mobilization to address youth violence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10.
Holden, D.J., Crankshaw, E., Nimsch, C., Hinnant, L.W., & Hund, L. (2004). Quantifying the impact of participation in local tobacco control groups on the psychological empowerment of involved youth . Health Education & Behavior, 31, 615-628.
11.
Holden, D.J., Evans, W.D., Hinnant, L.W., & Messeri, P. (2005). Modeling psychological empowerment among youth involved in local tobacco control efforts. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 264-278.
12.
Hughey, J., & Speer, P.W. (2002). Community, sense of community, and networks. In A. T. Fisher, C. C. Sonn, & B. J. Bishop (Eds.), Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications (pp. 69-88). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
13.
Hughey, J., Speer, P.W., & Peterson, N.A. (1999). Sense of community in community organizations: Structure and evidence of validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 97-113.
14.
Itzhaky, H., & York, A.S. (2003). Leadership competence and political control: The influential factors. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 371-381.
15.
Lasker, R.D., & Weiss, E.S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research . Journal of Urban Health, 80, 14-60.
16.
LeRoy, L., Benet, D.J., Mason, T., Austin, W.D., & Mills, S. (2004). Empowering organizations: Approaches to tobacco control through youth empowerment programs. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 577-596.
17.
Long, D.A., & Perkins, D.D. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sense of Community Index and development of a Brief SCI. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 279-296.
18.
Maton, K. (1988). Social support, organizational characteristics, psychological well-being, and group appraisal in three self-help group populations . American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 53-77.
19.
Maton, K.I., & Salem, D. (1995). Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings: A multiple case study approach. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 631-656.
20.
McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
21.
Miller, R.L., & Shinn, M. (2005). Learning from communities: Overcoming difficulties in dissemination of prevention and promotion efforts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 169-183.
22.
Obst, P.L., & White, K.M. (2004). Revisiting the sense of community index: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 691-705.
23.
Peterson, N.A., & Hughey, J. (2002). Tailoring organizational characteristics for empowerment: Accommodating individual economic resources. Journal of Community Practice, 10, 41-59.
24.
Peterson, N.A., Lowe, J.B., Aquilino, M.L., & Schneider, J.E. (2005). Linking social cohesion and gender to intrapersonal and interpersonal empowerment. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 233-244.
25.
Peterson, N.A., & Reid, R.J. (2003). Paths to empowerment in an urban community: Neighborhood connectedness and citizen participation in substance abuse prevention activities . Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 25-38.
26.
Peterson, N.A., & Speer, P.W. (2000). Linking organizational characteristics to psychological empowerment: Contextual issues in empowerment theory. Administration in Social Work, 24, 39-58.
27.
Peterson, N.A., Speer, P.W., & Hughey, J. (2006). The sense of community index: A methodological interpretation of the factor structure debate. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 453-469.
28.
Peterson, N.A., & Zimmerman, M.A. (2004). Beyond the individual: Toward a nomological network for organization empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 129-145.
29.
Quinn, R.E., & Spreitzer, G.M. (1991). The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life. In R. W. Pasmore & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (pp. 115-142). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
30.
Salem, D.A., Foster-Fishman, P.G., & Goodkind, J.R. (2002). The adoption of innovation in collective action organizations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 681-710.
31.
Sarason, S.B. (1993). American psychology and the needs for transcendence and community. Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 185-202.
32.
Singer, H.H., & Kegler, M.C. (2004). Assessing interorganizational networks as a dimension of community capacity: Illustrations from a community intervention to prevent lead poisoning. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 808-821.
33.
Speer, P.W., & Hughey, J. (1995). Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 729-748.
34.
Speer, P.W., Jackson, C.B., & Peterson, N.A. (2001). The relationship between social cohesion and empowerment: Support and new implications for theory. Health Education & Behavior, 28, 716-732.
35.
Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2003). The conceptual, historical, and practice roots of community based participatory research and related participatory traditions . In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 27-52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Zimmerman, M.A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43-63). New York: Plenum.
37.
Zimmerman, M.A., & Zahniser, J.H. (1991). Refinements of sphere-specific measures of perceived control: Development of a sociopolitical control scale . Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 189-204.
