Enhancing Adolescents' Responses to Projection Plates through a Dynamic Assessment Technique of Questioning

Abstract

The value of projected storying in assessment is widely recognised, perhaps nowhere more than when working with children and adolescents. Yet the technique has its pitfalls, including the way the stories produced may be influenced by digressing from standard instructions, using different methods of interpretation, and administering the instrument cross-culturally. Psychologists presenting projection plates to adolescent clients in South Africa frequently obtain little more than one-liners from standard procedures, raising doubts about viability and reliability of the technique. Questioning needs to be enhanced without compromising the projective value of responses. In this research we aimed to determine the effects of a dynamic assessment (DA) technique of questioning when using projection plates with adolescents in cross-cultural situations. Applying the test-mediate-retest principle of DA, the assessor explained to participants the relevance of her (strictly non-directive) verbal and non-verbal responses to their storying, as encouragement to elaborate on their responses. A multiple case-study was undertaken with three participants. Instrumentation consisted of two TAT plates and four non-standard plates, self-selected to accommodate possible cultural differences. Data-analysis and interpretation took two forms, projection analysis (using the Bellak TAT Analysis Blank and Haworth's analysis of defences) and structural analysis (with categories such as word-count, formulation, number of statements, prompts, hesitations, repetitions and increasing/deepening projection). Possible cross-cultural influences were considered. Results suggest a deepening and broadening of adolescents' projections in the form of richer stories when utilising a DA technique of questioning.

Keywords

cross-cultural assessment—projection culture-friendly—assessment culture-fair—assessment dynamic assessment dynamic assessment—projection TAT thematic apperception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archer

Rossouw

Lomofsky

Oliver

(1999). Assessment in an Inclusive Classroom. In Engelbrecht

Green

Naicker

Engelbrecht

(Eds), Inclusive Education in South Africa, pp. 97–126. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Arinow

Weiss

K.A.

Reznikoff

(2001). A Practical Guide to the Thematic Apperception Test: The TAT in Clinical Practice. Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.

Bellak

Abrams

D.M.

(1997). The Thematic Apperception Test, The Children's Apperception Test, and The Senior Apperception Technique in Clinical Use, 6th edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Bouwer

(2005). Identification and assessment of barriers to learning. In Landsberg

(Ed.), Addressing Barriers to Learning, pp. 45–60. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Brandell

J.R.

(2000). Of Mice and Metaphors. New York: Basic Books.

Cramer

(2004). Storytelling, Narrative, and the Thematic Apperception Test. New York: Guilford Press.

Elliott

J.G.

(2000). The Psychological Assessment of Children with Learning Difficulties. British Journal of Special Education, 27, 59–66.

Finchilescu

(2005). Meta-stereotypes May Hinder Inter-racial Contact. South African Journal of Psychology, 35, 460–472.

Gregory

R.J.

(2000). Psychological Testing, 3rd edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

10.

Grieve

K.W.

(2003). Factors Affecting Assessment Results. In Foxcroft

Roodt

(Eds), An introduction to psychological assessment in the South African context (pp. 315–343). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

11.

Hasson

Joffe

(2007). The Case for Dynamic Assessment in Speech and Language Therapy. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 23, 9–25.

12.

Haworth

M.R.

(1963). A Schedule for the Analysis of CAT Responses. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 27, 181–184.

13.

HPCSA. (2005). Form 208. Policy on the Classification of Psychometric Measuring Devices, Instruments, Methods and Techniques. Pretoria: HPCSA.

14.

Human-Vogel

(2004). Cognition and Learning. In Eloff

Ebersohn

(Eds), Keys to Educational Psychology (pp. 13–30). Cape Town: UCT Press.

15.

Jenkins

S.R.

(2008). A Handbook of Clinical Scoring Systems for Thematic Apperceptive Techniques. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

16.

Johnson

Cassell

(2001). Epistemology and Work Psychology: New Agendas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 125–143.

17.

Kaniel

(2001). Not all Testing is Dynamic Testing. Issues in Education, 7, 211–224.

18.

Kaufman

A.S.

Kaufman

N.L.

(2001). Series Preface. In Teglasi

, Essentials of TAT and Other Storytelling Techniques Assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

19.

Lauchlan

Elliot

(2001). The Psychological Assessment of Learning Potential. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 647–665.

20.

Moletsane

M.K.

(2004). The efficacy of the Rorschach among Black Learners in South Africa. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pretoria.

21.

Murphy

Maree

D.J.F.

(2006). A Review of South African Research in the Field of Dynamic Assessment. South African Journal of Psychology, 36, 168–191.

22.

Murray

H.A.

(1943). Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

23.

Murray

H.A.

(1971). Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

24.

Shamir

Tzuriel

Rozen

(2006). The Effects of Program Intervention, Maths Level, and Verbal Ability on Mediation Style and Improvement in Maths Problem Solving. School Psychology International, 27, 209–231.

25.

Stuart-Hamilton

(1996). Dictionary of Psychological Testing, Assessment and Treatment, Revised edn. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

26.

Sunderland

(2004). Using Story Telling as a Therapeutic Tool with Children. Oxon: Speechmark Publishing.

27.

Teglasi

(2001). Essentials of TAT and Other Storytelling Techniques Assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

28.

Tzuriel

(2000). Dynamic Assessment of Young Children Educational and Intervention Perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 385–435.

29.

Van Eeden

De Beer

(2001). Assessment of Cognitive Functioning. In Foxcroft

Roodt

(Eds), An Introduction to Psychological Assessment in the South African Context (pp. 175–208). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

30.

Van Ommen

(2005). Putting the PC in IQ: Images in the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd edn. South African Journal of Psychology, 35, 532–554.