This study examines the relationships of the personality traits of conscientiousness and excitement seeking with self-reported frequency of premeditated cheating in tests and exams among university students. The results show that the two traits combine to account for a statistically and practically significant proportion of variance in academic cheating. It appears that a lack of effort and a need for high excitement seeking may serve as predisposing traits with regard to academic cheating. A model of the role that the two traits may play in explaining academic cheating is presented.
BolinA. U. (2004). Self-control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 138, 101–114
2.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2003). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 319–338
3.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R.JónssonF. H. (2002). Validity and utility of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Examples from Europe. In de RaadB.PeruginiM. (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 61–77). Seattle, WA: Hofgrebe & Huber
4.
DawkinsR. L. (2004). Attributes and statuses of college students associated with classroom cheating on a small-sized campus. College Student Journal, 38, 116–129
5.
de BruinG. P.SchepersJ. M.TaylorN. (2005, June). Construct validity of the 16PF 5th Edition and the Basic Traits Inventory. Paper presented at the 8th annual SIOPSA conference, Pretoria
6.
de RaadB. (2000). The Big Five personality factors: The psycholexical approach to personality.Groningen: Hofgrebe & Huber
7.
de RaadB.PeruginiM. (2002). Big Five factor assessment: Introduction. In de RaadB.PeruginiM. (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 1–26). Groningen: Hofgrebe & Huber
8.
EysenckH. J.EysenckM. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach.New York: Plenum
9.
EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J.BarrettP. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21–19
10.
FerrariJ. R.BeckB. (1998). Affective responses before and after fraudulent excuses by academic procrastinators. Education, 118, 529–537
11.
FritzscheB. A.YoungB. R.HicksonK. C. (2003). Individual differences in academic procrastination tendency and writing success. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1549–1557
12.
GlicksohnJ.Ben-ShalomU.LazarM. (2004). Elements of unacceptable risk taking in combat units: An exercise in offender profiling. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 203–215
13.
GoldbergL. R. (1990). An alternative ‘Description of personality’: The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229
14.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
JensenL. A.ArnettJ. J.FeldmanS. S.CauffmanE. (2002). It's wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 209–228
17.
JohnsonJ. L.BloomM. (1995). An analysis of the contribution of the five factors of personality to variance in academic procrastination. Personality & Individual Differences, 18, 127–133
18.
McCabeD. L.TrevinoL. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–397
19.
McCabeD. L.TrevinoL. K.ButterfieldK. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 219
20.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1985). Updating Norman's adequate taxonomy: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710–721
21.
NonisS.SwiftC. O. (2001) An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 69–77
22.
OnesD. S.ViswesvaranC.SchmidtF. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679–703
23.
PaunonenS. V.AshtonM. C. (2001). Big Five predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 78–90
24.
PiedmontR. L. (1998). The Revised Neo Personality Inventory: Clinical and research applications.New York: Kluwer
25.
PinoN. W.SmithW. L. (2003). College students and academic dishonesty. College Student Journal, 37, 490–500
26.
RamsayL.TaylorN.de BruinG. P.MeiringD. (2005, May). The Big Five personality factors at work: A South African validation study. Poster presented at the International Symposium of Personality at Work, Luneburg, Germany
27.
RobertiJ. W. (2004). A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 256–279
28.
RobertsB. W.ChernyshenkoO. S.StarkS.GoldbergL. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103–139
29.
RoigM.DeTomassoL. (1995). Are college cheating and plagiarism related to academic procrastination?. Psychological Reports, 77, 691–698
30.
SackettP. R.DeVoreC.J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In AndersonN.OnesD. S.SinangilH. K.ViswesvaranC. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, Volume 1: Personnel psychology (pp. 145–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
31.
SalgadoJ. F. (2003). Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 76, 323–346
32.
TaylorN.de BruinG. P. (2003, September). Development of a South African Five Factor Personality Inventory. Paper presented at the 10th PsySSA conference, Kempton Park
33.
TaylorN.de BruinG. P. (2004, June). Personality across cultures: The case of the Basic Traits Inventory. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Industrial Psychology Conference, Pretoria
34.
WanekJ. E.SackettP. R.OnesD. S. (2003). Towards an understanding of integrity test similarities and differences: An item-level analysis of seven tests. Personnel Psychology, 56, 873–894
35.
WhitleyB. E.Jr. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–274
36.
ZuckermanM. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
37.
ZuckermanM. (1994). Impulsive unsocialized sensation seeking: The biological foundations of a basic dimension of personality. In BatesJ. E.WachsT. D. (Eds.), Temperament: Individual differences at the interface of biology and behavior (pp. 219–255). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association