This paper analyzes metalanguage in a series of annual reports about Alaska that were made to the U.S. Commissioner of Education from 1870 to 1902 as Protestant missionaries developed Alaska’s first territory-wide school system. A key aspect of the missionaries’ educational endeavor focused on language. Using methods of critical regional discourse analysis, this study examines how discussions of language in general, specific languages, language in use, practices of language education, and goals of language education were used to develop and enact a powerful set of language ideologies that set the stage for significant language shift in the region. It shows how missionary educators thought about the English language’s relationship to broader ideologies, how they viewed the problems associated with non-English languages, and how various agents enacted competing approaches to language that disrupted dominant ideologies that promoted English-only language and literacy practices while suppressing other languages.
An act providing a civil government for Alaska. 1885. In The statutes at large of the United States of America, December, 1883, to March, 1885, and recent treaties, postal conventions, and executive proclamations, 24-28. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
CharmazKathy. 2014. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. 2nd edn.London: Sage Publications.
10.
CulpeperJonathanDemmenJane. 2015. Keywords. In BiberDouglasReppenRandi (eds.), English corpus linguistics, 90-105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CummingsLance. 2011. Historical linguistics and language policy: A comparative look at Christian missions in Alaska. In Medina-RiveraAntonioWilberschiedLee (eds.), In, out and beyond: Studies on border confrontations, resolutions and encounters, 48-64. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
12.
CurryNiallPérez-ParedesPascual. 2023. Using corpus linguistics and grounded theory to explore EMI stakeholders’ discourse. In M. CurleSamanthaPunJack K. H. (eds.), Qualitative research methods in English medium instruction for emerging researchers: Theory and case studies of contemporary research, 45-61. London: Routledge.
13.
CushmanEllen. 2013. Elias Boudinot and the Cherokee Phoenix: The sponsors of literacy they were and were not. In DuffyJohnNelson ChristophJulieGoldblattEliGraffNelsonNowacekRebecca S.TraboldBryan (eds.), Literacy, economy, and power: Writing and research after “Literacy in American lives,”13-29. 2nd edn.Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
14.
DaleyPatrickJamesBeverly. 1998. Missionary voices as the discursive terrain for Native resistance. Journal of Communication Inquiry22(4). 365-384.
15.
DauenhauerRichard L.1997. Conflicting visions in Alaskan education. 3rd edn.Juneau, AK: Tlingit Readers, Inc.
16.
FaircloughN.2015. Language and power. 3rd edn.London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
17.
FlickUwe. 2009. An introduction to qualitative research. 7th edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
GeeJ.2014. An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. 4th edn.London: Routledge.
20.
HadleyGregory. 2017. Grounded theory in applied linguistics research: A practical guide. London: Routledge.
21.
HallStuart. 1996. The problem of ideology. In ChenKuan-HsingMorleyDavid (eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies, 24-45. London: Routledge.
22.
HaycoxStephen W.1984. Sheldon Jackson in historical perspective: Alaska Native schools and mission contracts, 1885-1894. The Pacific Historian28(1). 18-28.
23.
HaycoxStephen W.2002. Alaska: An American colony. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
24.
HirshbergDianeSharpSuzanne. 2005. Thirty years later: The long-term effect of boarding schools on Alaska Natives and their communities. Anchorage, AK: Institute of Social and Economic Research.
25.
JaworskiAdamCouplandNikolas. 2004. Introduction to part 1: Approaches to metalanguage. In JaworskiAdamCouplandNikolasGalasińskiDariusz (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives, 11-13. Berlin: De Gruyter.
26.
JaworskiAdamCouplandNikolasGalasińskiDariusz. 2004. Metalanguage: Why now? In JaworskiAdamCouplandNikolasGalasińskiDariusz (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives, 3-8. Berlin: De Gruyter.
27.
KraussMichael E.1980. Alaska Native languages: Past, present, and future. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center.
28.
KraussMichael E.HoltonGaryKerrJimWest.Colin T.2011. Indigenous peoples and languages of Alaska. Fairbanks and Anchorage, AK: Alaska Native Language Center and UAA Institute of Social and Economic Research. https://www.uaf.edu/anla/collections/map/ (7January, 2025).
29.
LandertDaniela. 2024. Methods in historical corpus pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
MachinDavidMayrAndrea. 2023. How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
31.
MacLeanEdna A.2014. Iñupiatun Uqaluit Taniktun Sivunniuġutiŋit, North Slope Iñupiaq to English dictionary. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska Press.
32.
MakoniSinfreePennycookAlastair. 2006. Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
33.
MiyaokaOsahito. 1980. Alaska Native languages in transition. Senri Ethnological Studies4. 169-203.
PartingtonAlanDuguidAlisonTaylorCharlotte. 2013. Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.
36.
PennycookAlastair. 1998. English and the discourses of colonialism. London: Routledge.
37.
PrestonDennis R.2004. Folk metalanguage. In JaworskiAdamCouplandNikolasGalasińskiDariusz (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives, 75-101. Berlin: De Gruyter.
38.
SaldañaJohnny. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 4th edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
39.
San PedroTimothy J.2015. Silence as shields: Agency and resistances among Native American students in the urban Southwest. Research in the Teaching of English50(2). 132-153.
40.
SangerGeorge P. (ed.). 1869. Treaty with Russia March 30, 1867. In The statutes at large, treaties, and proclamations of the United States of America from December 1867-March1869, 539-544. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
41.
SebbaMark. 2012. Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity and power. In JaffeAlexandraAndroutsopoulosJannisSebbaMarkJohnsonSally (eds.), Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity and power, 1-20. Berlin: De Gruyter.
42.
SimonsGary F.FennigCharles D. (eds.). 2017. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 20th edn.Dallas, TX: SIL International.
43.
Skutnabb-KangasTove. 2000. Linguistic genocide in education—Or worldwide diversity and human rights?Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
SmithLinda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. 2nd edn.London: Zed Books.
45.
StoneJennifer C.MackSamanthaHolley-KlineJacobHobackMitchell. 2020. Regulating language: Language policies in early American Christian missions in Alaska. In M. JuzwikMaryStoneJennifer C.BurkeKevin J.DávilaDenise (eds.), Legacies of Christian languaging and literacies in American education, 96-110. London: Routledge.
46.
Urvina, Anthony with Sally Urvina. 2016. More than God demands: Politics and influence of Christian missions in northwest Alaska 1897–1918. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska Press.
47.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1876. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1875. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
48.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1882. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1880. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
49.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1888. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1886-87. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
50.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1889. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1887-88. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
51.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1893. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1889-90. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
52.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1894. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1890-91. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
53.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1894. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1891-92. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
54.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1895. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1892-93. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
55.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1896. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1893-94. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
56.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1896. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1894-95. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
57.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1898. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1896-97. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
58.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1899. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1897-98. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
59.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1900. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1898-99. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
60.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1901. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1899-1900. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
61.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1902. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1900-1901. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
62.
U.S. Bureau of Education. 1903. Report of the Commissioner of Education for the year 1902. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
63.
Van DijkTeun A.2006. Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies11(2). 115-140.
64.
VizenorGerald R.2008. Survivance: Narratives of Native presence. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
65.
WilliamsMariaTláaSháa. 2009. The Comity Agreement: Missionization of Alaska Native people. In SháaMariaWilliamsTláa (ed.), The Alaska Native reader: History, culture, politics, 151-162. Durham: Duke University Press.
66.
WooffittRobin. 2005. Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London: Sage Publications.
67.
WoolardKathryn A.1998. Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B. SchieffelinBambiWoolardKathryn A.KroskrityPaul V. (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 3-47. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
68.
WyattVictoria. 1996. Female Native teachers in Southeast Alaska: Sarah Dickinson, Tillie Paul, and Frances Willard. In W. HaycoxStephenMangussoMary Childers (eds.), An Alaska anthology: Interpreting the past, 156-175. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
69.
WymanL.2012. Youth culture, language endangerment and linguistic survivance. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.
