The present article looks at patterns of Old and Middle English multiple adjectival modification (asyndetic and conjoined) and interprets their interrelations in the framework of Construction Grammar. This study contributes to previous research by offering a systematic, corpus-based comparison of formally related adjectival structures, which are analyzed from a usage-based perspective and then mapped onto the language network organized according to domain-general cognitive principles. The results indicate constructional change between Old and Middle English, which can be accounted for in terms of the reconfiguration of horizontal-relatedness links (which are based on contrast and alternation) and the resulting change in the vertical-inheritance structure. More broadly, the study confirms that any violations of the well-established Principle of No Synonymy in language may be explained in a diachronic perspective and with reference to general principles of language processing.
TaylorAnnWarnerAnthonyPintzukSusanBethsFrank. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE). Department of Linguistics, University of York. Oxford Text Archive. http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang22/YcoeHome1.htm (November, 2023).
3.
TruswellRobertAlcornRhonaDonaldsonJamesWallenbergJoel. 2018. A Parsed Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English, 1250-1325. https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/2310 (November, 2023).
4.
BechKristin. 2017. Old English and Old Norwegian noun phrases with two attributive adjectives. In RosénVictoriaDe SmedtKoenraad (eds.), The very model of a modern linguist, 1-18. Bergen: University of Bergen.
5.
BechKristin. 2019. Contextualizing Old English noun phrases. In BechKristinMöhlig-FalkeRuth (eds.), Grammar, discourse, context. Grammar and usage in language variation and change, 15-48. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
BreadmoreHelenCarrollJulia. 2016. Effects of orthographic, morphological and semantic overlap on short-term memory for words in typical and atypical development. Scientific Studies of Reading20(6). 471-489.
8.
CappelleBert. 2006. Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions 2006 SV1 7. 1-128.
9.
CroftWilliam. 2007. Construction Grammar. In GeeraertsDickCuyckensHubert (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 463-508. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
De SmetHendrikD’hoedtFraukeFonteynLaurenVan GoethemKristel. 2018. The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics29(2). 197-234.
11.
De VaereHildeKolkmannJuliaBellighThomas. 2020. Allostructions revisited. Journal of Pragmatics170. 96-111.
12.
FischerOlga. 2000. The position of the adjective in Old English. In Bermudez-OteroRicardoDenisonDavidHoggRichardMcCullyChris (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies. A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 153-182. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
13.
FischerOlga. 2001. The position of the adjective in (Old) English from an iconic perspective. In FischerOlgaNännyMax (eds.), The motivated sign, 249-276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14.
FischerOlga. 2004. Developments in the category adjective from Old to Middle English. Studies in Medieval Language and Literature19. 1-36.
15.
FischerOlga. 2006. On the position of adjectives in Middle English. English Language and Linguistics10(2). 253-288.
16.
FischerOlga. 2012. The status of the postponed ‘and-adjective’ construction in Old English: Attributive or predicative? In DenisonDavidBermúdez-OteroRicardoMcCullyChrisMooreEmma (eds.), Analysing older English, 251-284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
FischerOlgavan der WurffWim. 2006. Syntax. In HoggRichardDenisonDavid (eds.), A History of the English Language, 109-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
GoldbergAdele E.1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
GoldbergAdele E.2013. Constructionist approaches. In HoffmannThomasTrousdaleGraeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 15-31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
GrabskiMaciej. 2020. Three types of old English adjectival postposition: A corpus-based Construction Grammar approach. Journal of English Linguistics48(2). 166-198.
HaumannDagmar. 2003. The postnominal ‘and adjective’ construction in Old English. English Language and Linguistics7(1). 57-83.
24.
HilpertMartin. 2013. Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. In HoffmannThomasTrousdaleGraeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 458-474. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
HoffmannThomasTrousdaleGraeme. 2013. Construction Grammar: Introduction. In HoffmannThomasTrousdaleGraeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 1-12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
HunstonSusan. 2014. Pattern grammar in context. In HerbstThomasSchmidHans-JörgFaulhaberSusen (eds.), Constructions, collocations, patterns, 99-121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
27.
KuhnSherman M.1947. Synonyms in the Old English Bede. Journal of English and Germanic Philology46. 168-176.
28.
LyonsJohn. 1968. Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Middle English Dictionary. 1952-2001. LewisRobert E.et al (eds). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Online edition in Middle English Compendium. 2000-2018. McSparranFranceset al (eds). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/ (November, 2023).
30.
MitchellBruce. 1985. Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon.
31.
MurphyLynne. 2003. Semantic relations and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
PetréPeter. 2019. How constructions are born. The role of patterns in the constructionalization of be going to INF. In BusseBeatrixMöhlig-FalkeRuth (eds.), Patterns in language and linguistics: New perspectives on a ubiquitous concept, 157-192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
33.
PijpopsDirkSpeelmanDirkVan de VeldeFreekGrondelaersStefan. 2021. Incorporating the multilevel nature of the constructicon into hypothesis testing. Cognitive Linguistics32(3). 487-528.
34.
PyszAgnieszka. 2009. The syntax of prenominal and postnominal adjectives in Old English. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.
35.
R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/ (November, 2023).
Raumolin-BrunbergHelena. 1994. The position of adjectival modifiers in Late Middle English noun phrases. In FriesUdoTottieGunnelSchneiderPeter (eds.), Creating and using English language corpora, 159-168. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
38.
RiemerNick. 2010. Introducing semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SampsonSalena.2010. Noun Phrase word order variation in Old English verse and prose. Ohio State University PhD dissertation.
40.
SielankoElżbieta. 1994. Split coordinated structures in Late Old English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia29. 57-72.
41.
SommererLotteSmirnovaElena. 2020. Introduction: The nature of the node and the network – Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In SommererLotteSmirnovaElena (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 1-44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
42.
StefanowitschAnatolGriesStefan Th.2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8(2). 209-243.
43.
TorrentTiago Timponi. 2015. On the relation between inheritance and change: The constructional convergence and the construction network reconfiguration hypotheses. In BarðdalJóhannaSmirnovaElenaSommererLotteGildeaSpike (eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 173-212. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
44.
TraugottElizabeth ClossTrousdaleGraeme. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
UhrigPeter. 2015. Why the principle of no synonymy is overrated. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik63(3). 323-337.
46.
Van de VeldeFreek. 2014. Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In BoogaartRonnyCollemanTimothyRuttenGijsbert (eds.), The extending scope of Construction Grammar, 141-179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
47.
ZehentnerEva. 2018. Ditransitives in Middle English: On semantic specialisation and the rise of the dative alternation. English Language and Linguistics22(1). 149-175.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
