This study is a corpus-based analysis of clause-initial adverbs and their ability to invert pronominal and nominal subjects in Old English (OE) prose. There is a limited set of adverbs, referred to as “operators” in generative studies of OE syntax, which may cause inversion of personal pronoun subjects; these are þa, þonne, nu, and swa. In this study, numerous differences between the syntactic behavior of these adverbs are revealed, showing that they should not be treated as a syntactically coherent group. The analysis is focused on various factors that have an impact on inversion rates of the adverbs: the presence of the interjection hwæt before the adverb the frequency of correlation, Latin influence on translated texts, information status of the subject, semantic differences and the extra-clausal status of the adverb, as well as diachronic changes within the OE period.
TaylorAnnWarnerAnthonyPintzukSusanBethsFrank. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE). Department of Linguistics, University of York. Oxford Text Archive. URL: http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang22/YcoeHome1.htm (15September2015).
4.
AllenCynthia L.1995. Case marking and reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BakerPeter S.2003. Introduction to Old English. London: Blackwell.
6.
BechKristin. 2001. Word order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen dissertation.
7.
BechKristin. 2016. Old truths, new corpora: Revisiting the word order of conjunct clauses in Old English. English Language and Linguistics1(25). (FirstView).
8.
BiberDouglasJohanssonStigLeechGeoffreyConradSusanFineganEdward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson.
BreivikLeiv Egil. 2005. The historical development of existential there: An example of subjectification in grammaticalization. In McCaffertyKevinBullToveKillieKristin (eds.), Contexts—Historical, social, linguistic. Studies in celebration of Toril Swan, 163–185. Bern: Peter Lang.
11.
BrintonLaurel J.1996. Pragmatic markers in English. Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12.
CichoszAnna. 2016. Old English verbs of saying and verb-initial order. English Language and Linguistics (First View).
13.
CichoszAnna. Forthcoming a. The constituent order of hwæt-clauses in Old English prose. Journal of Germanic Linguistics.
14.
CichoszAnna. Forthcoming b. Verb-initial main clauses in Bede: A translation effect? In KijakAndrzejNykielJerzy M.ŁęckiAndrzej (eds.), Current developments in English historical linguistics. Studies in honour of Professor Rafał Molencki. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
15.
CichoszAnnaGaszewskiJerzy. 2014. The verb-second phenomenon in the Old English Bible: The question of representativeness. Journal of English Linguistics42(2). 114-143.
16.
CichoszAnnaGaszewskiJerzyPęzikPiotr. 2016. Element order of Old English and Old High German translations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17.
FischerOlga. 2010. An analogical approach to grammaticalization. In StathiKaterinGehweilerElkeKönigEkkehard (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues, 181-220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18.
FischerOlgaKemenadeAns vanKoopmanWillemvan der WurffWim. 2000. The Syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HaeberliEric. 2002. Observations on the loss of Verb Second in the history of English. In ZwartC.Jan-WouterAbrahamWerner (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, 245-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20.
KemenadeAnsLosBettelou. 2009. Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In KemenadeAns vanLosBettelou (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 224-248. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
21.
KemenadeAnsWestergaardMarit. 2012. Syntax and information structure: Verb-Second variation in Middle English. In Meurman-SolinAnneliLopez-CousoMaria JoseLosBettelou (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 87-118. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
KoopmanWillem. 1998. Inversion after single and multiple topic in Old English. In FisiakJacekKrygierMarcin (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics, 135-149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
23.
KrochAnthonyTaylorAnn. 1997. Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact. In KemenadeAns vanVincentNigel (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 297-325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KrochAnthonyTaylorAnnRingeDonald. 2000. The Middle English Verb-Second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. In HerringSusan C.van ReenenPieterSchoeslerLene (eds.), Textual parameters in older languages, 353-392. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25.
MitchellBruce. 1985. Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon.
26.
PetrovaSvetlana. 2006. A discourse-based approach to verb placement in early West-Germanic. In IshiharaShinichiroSchmitzMichaelaSchwarzAnne (eds.), Working papers of the SFB632, interdisciplinary studies on information structure (ISIS)5, 153-182. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
27.
PintzukSusan. 1999. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.
28.
RingeDonTaylorAnn. 2014. The development of Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
TaylorAnn. 2008. Contact effects of translation: Distinguishing two kinds of influence in Old English. Language Variation and Change20(3). 341-365.
30.
WalkdenGeorge. 2013. The status of hwæt in Old English. English Language and Linguistics17(3). 465-488.
31.
WarnerAnthony. 2007. Parameters of variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in late Middle English. English Language and Linguistics11(1). 81-112.
32.
WårvikBrita.2011. Connective or “disconnective” discourse marker? Old English þa, multifunctionality and narrative structuring. In Meurman-SolinAnneliLenkerUrsula (eds.), Studies in variation, contacts and change in English 8: Connectives in synchrony and diachrony in European languages. Helsinki: VARIENG. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/08/warvik/ (1October2016).
