This article examines adnominal relative clauses in Asian Englishes, looking specifically at the distribution of relative words. Drawing on data from the ICE corpora, it compares the varieties spoken in India, Hong Kong, and Singapore. In particular it considers (a) linguistic factors such as the degree of animacy of the antecedent and the syntactic function realized by the relative word in the relative clause and (b) extralinguistic issues such as the effect of cognitive constraints typically associated with language contact situations and the impact of sociocultural factors, which can often determine differences between varieties. An examination of these issues uncovers specificities in the distribution of relative words that are related both to the different degrees of development of the corresponding local standard variety and to the interaction between the superstrate and the different substrate languages.
AllenCynthia. 1980. Movement and deletion in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry11(2). 261-323.
2.
AlsagoffLubna. 1995. Colloquial Singapore English: The relative clause construction. In PakirAnne (ed.), The English language in Singapore: Implications for teaching, 77-87. Singapore: Singapore Association of Applied Linguists.
3.
AlsagoffLubnaLickHo Chee. 1998. The relative clause in colloquial Singapore English. World Englishes17(2). 127-138.
BhattRakesh M.2004. Indian English: Syntax. In KortmannBerndBurridgeKateMesthrieRajendSchneiderEdgar W.UptonClive (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, vol. 2, Morphology and syntax, 1016-1130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6.
BiberDouglasGrieveJackIberri-SheaGina. 2006. Noun phrase modification. In RohdenburgGünterSchlüterJulia (eds.), One language, two grammars?, 182-193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BiberDouglasJohanssonStigLeechGeoffreyConradSusanFineganEdward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
8.
CheshireJennyAdgerDavidFoxSue. 2013. Relative who and the actuation problem. Lingua126. 51-77.
9.
DasguptaProbal. 1993. The otherness of English: India’s auntie tongue syndrome. New Delhi: Sage.
10.
DekeyserXavier. 1988. Preposition stranding and relative complementizer deletion. Implicational tendencies in English and the other Germanic languages. Leuvense Bijdragen77. 161-181.
11.
DenisonDavidHundtMarianne. 2013. Defining relatives. Journal of English Linguistics41(2). 135-167.
12.
DeterdingDavid. 2007. Singapore English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
13.
DryerMatthew S.2011. Order of relative clause and noun. In DryerMatthew S.HaspelmathMartin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. http://wals.info/chapter/90 (28January2013).
14.
GargeshRavinder. 2004. Indian English: Phonology. In SchneiderEdgar W.BurridgeKateKortmannBerndMesthrieRajendUptonClive (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, vol. 1, Phonology, 992-1002. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
15.
GisborneNikolas. 2000. Relative clauses in Hong Kong English. World Englishes19. 357-371.
16.
GregoryMichelle L.MichaelisLaura A.2001. Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics33(11). 1665-1706.
17.
GutUlrikeCoronelLilian. 2012. Relatives worldwide. In HundtMarianneGutUlrike (eds.), Mapping unity and diversity worldwide: Corpus-based studies of New Englishes, 215-242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18.
GuyGregory R.BayleyRobert. 1995. On the choice of relative pronouns in English. American Speech70(2). 148-172.
19.
HenderyRachel. 2012. Relative clauses in time and space: A case study in methods of diachronic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20.
HerrmannTanja. 2003. Relative clauses in dialects of English: A typological approach. Freiburg, Germany: University of Freiburg dissertation.
21.
HoffmannThomas. 2005. Variable vs. categorical effects. Journal of English Linguistics33(3). 257-297.
22.
HoffmannThomas. 2011. Preposition placement in English: A usage-based approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HuddlestonRodneyPullumGeoffrey K.2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KachruBraj. 1994. English in South Asia. In BurchfieldRobert (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 5, English in Britain and overseas: Origins and development, 497-553. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
KeenanEdwardComrieBernd. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry8(1). 63-99.
27.
KillingleySiew-Yue. 1993. Cantonese. Munich: Lincom Europa.
28.
KortmannBernd. 2006. Syntactic variation in English. In AartsBasMcMahonApril (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 603-624. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.
29.
KortmannBerndLunkenheimerKerstin (eds.). 2011. The electronic world atlas of varieties of English [eWAVE]. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://www.ewave-atlas.org/ (28January2013).
30.
KortmannBerndSzmrecsanyiBenedikt. 2004. Global synopsis: Morphological and syntactic features in English. In KortmannBerndBurridgeKateMesthrieRajendSchneiderEdgar W.UptonClive (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, vol. 2, Morphology and syntax, 1142-1202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
31.
LambrechtKnud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse references. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LangeClaudia. 2012. The syntax of spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33.
MahajanAnoop. 2000. Relative asymmetries and Hindi correlatives. In AlexiadouArtemiKawPaulMeinungerAndréWilderChris (eds.), The syntax of relative clauses, 201-230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34.
MaxwellDan. 1979. Strategies of relativization and NP accessibility. Language55(2). 352-371.
35.
McCawleyJames D.2004. Remarks on adsentential, adnominal and extraposed relative clauses in Hindi. In DayalVeneetaMahajanAnoop (eds.), Clause structure in South Asian languages, 291-311. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
36.
MesthrieRajend. 2004. Introduction: Varieties of English in Africa and South and Southeast Asia. In KortmannBerndBurridgeKateMesthrieRajendSchneiderEdgar W.UptonClive (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, vol. 2, Morphology and syntax, 805-812. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
37.
MesthrieRajendBhattRakesh M.2008. World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
MontgomeryMichael. 1989. The standardization of English relative clauses. In TrahernJoseph B. (ed.), Standardizing English: Essays in the history of language change, in honor of John Hurt Fisher, 111-138. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
39.
NewbrookMark. 1998. Which way? That way? Variation and ongoing changes in the English relative clause. World Englishes17(1). 43-59.
40.
NewbrookMark. 2003. Features of the relative clause in Singapore English. In DeterdingDavidLingLow EeBrownAdam (eds.), English in Singapore: Research on grammar, 67-76. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
41.
QuirkRandolph. 1957. Relative clauses in educated spoken English. English Studies38. 97-109.
42.
QuirkRandolphGreenbaumSidneyLeechGeoffreySvartvikJan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
43.
SailajaPingali. 2009. Indian English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
44.
SchneiderEdgar. 1989. American earlier Black English. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
45.
SchneiderEdgar. 1992. Who(m)? Constraints on the loss of case marking of wh-pronouns in the English of Shakespeare and other poets of the Early Modern English period. In RissanenMattiIhalainenOssiNevalainenTerttuTaavitsainenIrma (eds.), History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics, 437-452. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
46.
SchneiderEdgar. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
SchneiderEdgar. 2011. English around the world: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SeoaneElenaSuárez-GómezCristina. 2013. The expression of the perfect in East and South-East Asian Englishes. English World-Wide34(1). 1-25.
49.
SetterJaneWongCathy S. P.ChangBrian H. S.2010. Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
50.
SigleyRobert. 1997. The influence of formality and channel on relative pronoun choice in New Zealand English. English Language and Linguistics1(2). 207-232.
51.
SilversteinMichael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In DixonRobert M. W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
52.
SridharS. N.1992. The ecology of bilingual competence: Language interaction in the syntax of indigenized varieties of English. World Englishes11(2-3). 141-150.
53.
SrivastavVenneta. 1991. The syntax and semantics of correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory9(4). 637-686.
54.
Suárez-GómezCristina. 2006. Relativization in early English (950-1250): The position of relative clauses. Bern: Peter Lang.
55.
TagliamonteSali. 2002. Variation and change in the British relative marker system. In PoussaPatricia (ed.), Dialect contact on the North Sea Littoral, 147-165. Munich: Lincom Europa.
56.
Tizón-CoutoDavid. 2012. Left-dislocation in English. Bern: Peter Lang.
57.
TottieGunnel. 1997. Overseas relatives: British-American differences in relative marker usage. In AartsJanWekkerHerman (eds.), Studies in English language research and teaching, 153-165. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
58.
TottieGunnel. 1997. Relatively speaking. Relative marker usage in the British National Corpus. In NevalainenTerttuKahlas-TarkkaLeena (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, 465-481. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
59.
TottieGunnelHarvieDawn. 2000. It’s all relative: Relativization strategies in early African American English. In PoplackShana (ed.), The English history of African American English, 198-230. Oxford: Blackwell.
60.
TottieGunnelReyMichael. 1997. Relativization strategies in earlier African American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change9(2). 219-247.
61.
TraugottElizabeth C.1992. Syntax. In HoggRichard M. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 1, The beginnings to 1066, 168-289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
WeeLionel2004. Singapore English: Morphology and syntax. In KortmannBerndBurridgeKateMesthrieRajendSchneiderEdgar W.UptonClive (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, vol. 2, Morphology and syntax, 1058-1072. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
