Literature on the Belfast dialect of English typically describes it as one that is characterized by a rise-plateau nuclear pattern in declaratives. Informal listening suggests, however, that a falling nuclear pattern is employed in several instances, and its use appears to be gender related, in that it is found more frequently in female speech. A production study is carried out to discover the frequency of production of falling nuclear patterns in male and female speakers, and a perception test on Belfast speakers provides evidence that the use of falling nuclear pattern creates impressions of expressivity, emotional engagement, enthusiasm, and commitment to establishing effective interaction with the participant in the speech event.
AndersonAnne H.BaderMilesBardEllen GurmanBoyleElizabethDohertyGwynethGarrodSimonIsardStephenKowtkoJacquelineMcAllisterJanMillerJimSotilloCatherineHenryS. ThompsonWeinertRegina. 1991. The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech34. 351-366.
BritainDavid. 1992. Linguistic change in intonation: The use of high rising terminals in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change4. 77-104.
4.
Campbell-KiblerKathryn. 2009. The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change21. >135-156.
5.
CheshireJenny. 2003. Sex and gender in variationist research. In ChambersJ. K.TrudgillPeterSchilling-EstesNatalie (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 423-443. Oxford: Blackwell.
6.
ChunDorothy. 2002. Discourse intonation in L2: From theory and research to practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7.
CruttendenAlan. 1997. Intonation. 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
DalyNicolaWarrenPaul. 2001. Pitching it differently in New Zealand English: Speaker sex and intonation patterns. Journal of Sociolinguistics5(1). 85-96.
9.
Douglas-CowieEllenCowieRoderickSneddonIanCoxCatherineLowryOrlaMcRorieMargaretJean-MartinClaudeDevillersLaurenceBatlinerAnton. 2007. The humaine database: Addressing the needs of the affective. In PaivaAnaPradaRuiPicardRosalind (eds.), 2nd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII’2007), LNCS4738. 488-500.
10.
EckertPenelope. 2005.Variation, convention and social meaning. Oakland, CA: 79th annual Linguistic Society of America meeting paper.
11.
EckertPenelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics12(4). 453-476.
12.
EckertPenelopeMcConnell-GinetSally. 2003. Language and gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FeldSteven. 1990. Sound and sentiment: Birds, weeping, poetics and song in Kaluli expression. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Philadelphia University Press.
14.
FoulkesPaul. 2006. Phonological variation: A global perspective. In AartsBaasMcMahonApril (eds.), Handbook of English linguistics, 625-669. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
15.
GrabeEsther. 2002. Variation adds to prosodic typology. In BelBernardMarlinIsabelle (eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, 127-132. Aix-en-Provence, France: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
16.
GrabeEsther. 2004. Intonational variation in urban dialects of English spoken in the British Isles. In GillesPeterPetersJorg (eds.), Regional variation in intonation, 9-31. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer, Linguistische Arbeiten.
17.
GrabeEstherKochanskiGregColemanJohn. 2005. The intonation of native accent varieties in the British Isles—potential for miscommunication? In Dziubalska-KolaczykKatarzynaPrzedlackaJoanna (eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene, 311-337. Linguistic Insights Series. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
18.
GrabeEstherPostBretche. 2002. Intonational variation in English. In BelBernardMarlinIsabelle (eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, 343-346. Aix-en-Provence, France: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
19.
GussenhovenCarlos. 1986. The intonation of George and Mildred: Post-nuclear generalisations. In Johns-LewisCatherine (ed.), Intonation in discourse, 77-121. London: Croom Helm.
20.
GuyGregoryHorvathBarbaraVonwillerJuliaDaisleyElaineRogersInge. 1986. An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society15. 23-52.
21.
GuyGregoryVonwillerJulia. 1989. The high rise tones in Australian English. In CollinsPeterBlairDavid (eds.), Australian English, 21-34. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
22.
HaanJudithvan HeuvenVincent. 1999. Male vs. female pitch range in Dutch questions. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress of Phonetic Science. 1581-1584.
23.
HolmesJanet. 1997. Setting new standards: Sound changes and gender in New Zealand English. English World-Wide18(1). 107-142.
24.
JarmanEricCruttendenAlan. 1976. Belfast intonation and the myth of the fall. Journal of the International Phonetics Association6. 4-12.
25.
JohnsonKeith. 2005. Speaker normalization. In RemezRobertPisoniDavid (eds.), The handbook of speech perception, 363-389. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26.
JohnsonKeith. 2006. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics34. 485-499.
27.
KulickDon. 1998. Anger, gender, language shift, and the politics of revelation in a Papua New Guinean village. In SchieffelinBambi B.WoolardKathryn A.KroskrityPaul V. (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 87-102. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
LabovWilliam. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
29.
LaddD. Robert. 1980. The structure of intonational meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
LutzCatherine. 1988. Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to Western theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
LutzCatherine. 1990. Engendered emotion: Gender, power, and the rhetoric of emotional control in American discourse. In LutzCatherineAbu-LughodLila (eds.), Language and the politics of emotion, 69-91. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
McConnell-GinetSally. 1983. Intonation in a man’s world. In ThorneBarryKramaraeCherisHenleyNancy (eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, 69-88. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
38.
McLemoreCynthia. 1992. The interpretation of L*H in English. In McLemoreCynthia (ed.), Texas Linguistic Forum32, 127-147. Austin: University of Texas.
39.
MoonwomonBirch. 1995. The writing on the wall. In HallKiraBucholtzMary (eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self, 447-468. New York: Routledge.
40.
MunsonBenjamin. 2007. Lexical characteristics mediate the influence of sex and sex typicality on vowel-space size. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetics Sciences, 885-888.
41.
NolanFrancis. 1991. Forensic phonetics. Journal of Linguistics27. 483-493.
42.
OchsElinor. 1991. Indexing gender. In DurantiAlessandroGoodwinCharles (eds.), Rethinking context, 335-358. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
PodesvaRobert. 2006. Intonational variation and social meaning: Categorical and phonetic aspects. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics12(2). 189-202.
44.
RahillyJoan1997. Aspects of prosody in Hiberno-English. The case of Belfast. In KallenJeffrey L. (ed.), Focus on Ireland, 109-132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45.
SchieffelinBambi. 1990. The give and take of everyday life: Language socialization of Kaluli children. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
TheuneMarietMeijsKoenHeylenDirkOrdelmanRoeland. 2006. Generating expressive speech for storytelling applications. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing14(4). 1137-1144.
47.
WellsBillPeppéSue. 1996. Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and turn-taking in English dialects. In Couper-KuhlenElizabethSeltingMargret (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, 101-130. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
