This article proposes a history of the English word lame, based on quantitative and qualitative evidence from twentieth-century corpora. A path of semantic development is proposed for lame in the twentieth century, from concrete contexts with animate referents to abstract contexts with inanimate referents and abstract contexts with human referents. While lame does participate in the universal tendencies of semantic generalization and subjectification, its participation in contextual generalization is skewed by the strong discursive power of its most common concrete use, human disability. It is suggested that the abstract meanings of lame are the result of the crystallization of frequently occurring inferences surrounding human impairment and disability.
Aaron, Jessi Elana.2004. The gendered use of salirse in Mexican Spanish: Si me salía yo con las amigas, se enojaba. Language in Society33(4). 585-607.
2.
Aaron, Jessi Elana.2006. Variation and change in Spanish future temporal expression . Albuquerque: University of New Mexico dissertation.
3.
American Heritage Book of English Usage: A practical and authoritative guide to contemporary English.1996. Boston : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
4.
Antaki, Charles, Chris Walton, & W.M.L. Finlay .2007. How proposing an activity to a person with an intellectual disability can imply a limited identity. Discourse & Society18. 393-410.
5.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, Costas Canakis, & Bert Cornillie (eds.). 2006. Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity . Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Barnes, Colin.1992a. Disabling imagery and the media: An exploration of the principles for media representations of disabled people. Derby: British Council of Disabled People.
8.
Barnes, Colin.1992b. Institutional discrimination against disabled people and the campaign for anti-discrimination legislation. Critical Social Policy12(5). 5-22.
9.
Barnes, Colin.1994. Images of disability. In Sally French (ed.), On equal terms: Working with disabled people, 35-46. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
10.
Barnes, Colin.1997. A legacy of oppression: A history of disability in Western culture. In Len Barton & Mike Oliver (eds.), Disability studies: Past, present and future, 3-24. Leeds, UK: Disability Press.
11.
Barton, Ellen L.1996. Negotiating expertise in discourses of disability . TEXT16(3). 299-322.
12.
Barton, Ellen L.1999. Informational and interactional functions of slogans and sayings in the discourse of a support group. Discourse & Society10(4). 461-486.
13.
Barton, Ellen L.2001. Textual practices of erasure: Representations of disability and the founding of the United Way. In James Wilson & Cynthia Lewiecki-Wilson (eds.), Embodied rhetorics: Disability in language and culture, 169-199. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
14.
Baynton, Douglas C.1996. Forbidden signs: American culture and the campaign against sign language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Biklen, Douglas & Robert Bogdana.1977. Media portrayal of disabled people: A study of stereotypes . Inter-Racial Children’s Book Bulletin8(6-7). 4-9.
16.
Blocksidge, David (ed.). 2003. Disabled People’s Association’s dictionary of disability terminology . Singapore: Disabled People’s Association. http://www.dpa.org.sg/Publications/dictionary.asp (20 August 2007).
17.
Bobandcarole.2007. Child molester-alt.vampyres . http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vampyres/browse_thread/thread/f1e6af741648b23e/19ab689efb0c2089 (21 October 2007).
18.
Bolinger, Dwight.1971. Semantic overloading: A restudy of the verb remind . Language47(3). 522-547.
19.
Bragg, Lois.1997. From the mute god to the lesser god: Disability in medieval Celtic and Old Norse literature. Disability & Society12. 165-177.
20.
British National Corpus.1980- 1993. Directed by Mark Davies, Brigham Young University. http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/. December 3, 2007.
21.
Bybee, Joan.2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Bybee, Joan.2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602-623. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
23.
Bybee, Joan & Paul Hopper.2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24.
Bybee, Joan & William Pagliuca.1987. The evolution of future meaning. In Anna Giacalone-Ramat, Onofrio Carruba, & Guiliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL), 109-122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
25.
Bybee, Joan & Sandra Thompson.2000. Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistic Society23. 65-85.
26.
Cahill, Spencer E. & Robin Eggleston.1994. Managing emotions in public: The case of wheelchair users . Social Psychology Quarterly57(4). 300-312.
27.
Clark, Lawrence.2003. Disabling comedy: "Only when we laugh!" Liverpool, UK: Finding the Spotlight Conference paper .
28.
Clark, Lawrence & Stephen Marsh.2002. Patriarchy in the UK: The language of disability . Leeds, UK: Centre for Disability Studies. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Clark,%20Laurence/language.pdf (20 August 2007).
29.
CNN.2008. Disabled: China changes Olympic language. http://www.cnn.com/2008/SPORT/05/29/olympics.disabled.ap/index.html?section=cnn_latest (29 May 2008 ).
30.
Cole, Peter.1975. The synchronic and diachronic status of conversational implicature. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts, vol. 3, 257-288. New York: Academic Press.
31.
Connell, Robert W.1987. Gender and power. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
32.
Crowther, Neil.2007. Nothing without us or nothing about us?http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disabilitystudies/archiveuk/crowther/Nothing%20without%20us-bt.pdf (13 February 2007).
33.
Dasher, Richard B.1995. Grammaticalization in the system of Japanese predicate honorifics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.
34.
de Beauvoir, Simone.1976. The second sex. Harmondsworth , UK: Penguin.
35.
Dilts, Philip & John Newman.2006. A note on quantifying "good" and "bad" prosodies . Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory2(2). 233-242.
36.
Elliott, Francis.2006. Allow "active euthanasia" for disabled babies, doctors urge. The Independent UK. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-news/allowactive-euthanasia-for-disabled-babies-doctors-urge-423059.html (2 August 2008).
37.
Enfield, N. J. (ed.). 2002. Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
Fairclough, Norman.1989. Language and power. London: Longman.
39.
Fairclough, Norman.1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge , UK: Polity.
40.
Fairclough, Norman.1995. Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
41.
Fairclough, Norman.2000. New labour, new language?London : Routledge.
42.
Foucault, Michel.1972. The archaeology of knowledge. New York : Pantheon.
43.
Foucault, Michel.1994. The birth of the clinic. New York: Vintage.
44.
Fowler, Roger.1996. On critical linguistics. In Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis, 3-14. London: Routledge.
45.
Gabrielatos, Costas & Paul Baker.2008. Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996-2005. Journal of English Linguistics36(1). 5-38.
46.
Galasinski, Dariusz & Carol Marley.1998. Agency in foreign news: A linguistic complement of a content analytical study. Journal of Pragmatics30(5). 565-587.
47.
Galvin, Rose.2003. The making of the disabled identity: A linguistic analysis of marginalisation. Disability Studies Quarterly23(2). 149-178.
48.
Givón, Talmy.1971. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaelogist’s field trip. Chicago Linguistic Society7. 394-415.
49.
Goffman, Erving.1986. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity . New York: Simon & Schuster .
50.
Gosling, Ju.2003. The philosophy and culture of the UK Disability Arts Movement-A personal perspective. Introduction to "Helping the Handicapped."Sinnlos. http://www.sinnlos.st/help/eng/help7.htm (20 August 2007).
51.
Grice, Paul.1975/1989. Logic and conversation. In Paul Grice, Studies in the way of words, 22-40. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
52.
Hall, Stuart.2001. The spectacle of the Other. In Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor & Simeon J. Yates (eds.), Discourse theory and practice, 324-344. London: Sage .
Haspelmath, Martin.1997. From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. Munich: Lincom Europa .
55.
Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh.1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages . Hamburg, Germany: Helmut Buske .
56.
Heller, Monica.1999. Ebonics, language revival, la qualité de la langue and more: What do we have to say about the language debates of our time?Journal of Sociolinguistics3(2). 260-266.
57.
Hopper, Paul J.1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization , 17-35. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
58.
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott.1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Huet, Marie-Hélène.1998. Monstrous imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
60.
Ihaleinen, Pasi.2006. Between historical semantics and pragmatics: Reconstructing past political thought through conceptual history. Journal of Historical Pragmatics7(1). 115-143.
61.
Johnson, M.2006. "Lame, lame, lame." Edge-centric: Rants & musings from your Ragged Edge Editor. Ragged Edge Online. http://www.raggededgemagazine.com/blogs/edgecentric/metaphors_for_bad/000792.html (2 August 2008).
62.
Jones, Steven.2002. Antonymy: A corpus-based approach. London: Routledge.
63.
Jones, Steven.2006. A lexico-syntactic analysis of antonym co-occurrence in spoken English. Text & Talk26(2). 191-216.
64.
Jones, Steven & M. Lynne Murphy.2005. Using corpora to investigate antonymy acquisition. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics10(3). 393-413.
65.
Kemmer, Suzanne & Michael Barlow (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models for language. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
66.
Koyama, Emi.2000-2007. "Lame is good." Eminism.org: Putting the Emi back in feminism since 1975. http://eminism.org/ (17 February 2007).
67.
Krishnamurthy, Ramesh.1996. Ethnic, racial and tribal: The language of racism? In Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), Critical discourse analysis, 129-149 . London: Routledge.
68.
Kudlick, Catherine J.2003. Disability history: Why we need another "Other."American Historical Review108(3). http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/ahr/108.3/kudlick.html (3 November 2007).
69.
Labov, William.1973. The linguistic consequences of being a Lame. Language in Society2(1). 81-115.
70.
Lang, Susan S.2005. Federal policies keep people with disabilities in a "poverty trap," say Cornell experts in urging major reforms. Cornell University News Service. http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Aug05/disability.poverty.ssl.html (23 May 2009).
Louw, Bill.1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer?-The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Mona Baker , Gill Francis, & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: In honor of John Sinclair, 157-176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
73.
Martin, Gary.1996-2009. The phrase finder. http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/111450.html. (23 May 2009 ).
74.
Mautner, Gerlinde.2007. Mining large corpora for social information: The case of elderly. Language in Society36(1). 51-72.
75.
McRuer, Robert.2006. Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability . Albany: New York University Press .
76.
Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. University of Michigan . http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/micase/. December 3, 2007.
77.
Miller, Gustavus Hindman.1901. What’s in a dream: A scientific and practical interpretation of dreams. http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupid?key=olbp23787 (12 June 2008).
78.
Mitchell, David T. & Sharon L. Snyder.1995. Vital signs: Crip culture talks back. Boston: Fanlight Productions.
79.
Mitchell, David T. & Sharon L. Snyder.2000. Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
80.
Mitchell, David T. & Sharon L. Snyder.2003. The Eugenic Atlantic: Race, disability, and the making of an international Eugenic Science, 1800-1945. Disability & Society18(7). 843-864. Morris, Jenny.1991. Pride against prejudice. London : Women’s Press.
81.
Orpin, Debbie.2005. Corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Examining the ideology of sleaze. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics10(1). 37-61.
82.
Oxford Dictionary of English Online. 2005. http://dws-sketch.uk.oup.com/cgi-bin/onlineOde/print_entry.cgi?id=D002667751&match_point=-1&lemma=&right_column_mode=labels&caption_style=short&search_type=simple (23 May 2009).
83.
Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2007. http://dictionary.oed.com/entrance.dtl (13 February 2007).
84.
Partington, Alan.2004. Utterly content in each other’s company: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics9(1). 131-156.
85.
Pike, Kenneth.1967. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
86.
Pinker, Steven.2007. The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York: Viking.
87.
Poplack, Shana & Danielle Turpin.1999. Does the FUTUR have a future in (Canadian) French ? Probus11(1). 133-164.
88.
Reid, D. Kim & Michelle G. Knight.2006. Disability justifies exclusion of minority students: A critical history grounded in Disability Studies. Educational Researcher35(6). 18-23.
89.
Rickford, John R.1999. The Ebonics controversy in my backyard: A sociolinguist’s experiences and reflections. Journal of Sociolinguistics3(2). 267-275.
90.
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, Ann P. Anas, & Andrea J. S. Gruneir.2006. Evaluations of overhelping and underhelping communication: Do old age and physical disability matter?Journal of Language and Social Psychology25(1). 97-107.
91.
Shakespeare, Tom.1994. Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins for disavowal. Disability & Society9(3). 283-299.
92.
Sharrock, Wes W. & Digby C. Anderson.1981. Language, thought and reality again . Sociology15(2). 287-293.
93.
Sinclair, John M.1987. Looking up. London: Collins.
94.
Sinclair, John M.1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
95.
Sinclair, John M.1998. The lexical item. In Edda Weigand (ed.), Contrastive lexical semantics, 1-24 . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
96.
Smith, Jack.1985. Is the language itself disabled in that it can’t fairly define the handicapped?Los Angeles Times, 9 April, 1.
97.
Snyder, Sharon L. & David T. Mitchell.2001. Re-engaging the body: Disability studies and the resistance to embodiment. Public Culture13(3). 367-389.
98.
Stiker, Henri-Jacques.1999. A history of disability. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
99.
Stubbs, Michael.1992. Institutional linguistics: Language and institutions, linguistics and sociology. In Martin Putz (ed.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution, 189-214 . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
100.
Stubbs, Michael.1996. Text and corpus analysis. Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
101.
Stubbs, Michael.1997. Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis (CDA). In Anne Ryan & Alison Wray (eds.), Evolving models of language, 110-116. Clevedon, UK: BAAL.
102.
Stubbs, Michael.2001. Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics . Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
103.
Sweetser, Eve Eliot.1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Annie Jaisser, Helen Singmaster , & Shelley Axmaker (eds.), Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, 389-405. Berkeley, CA : Berkeley Linguistics Society.
104.
Sweetser, Eve Eliot.1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
105.
Telegraph.co.uk.2006. BBC defends DJ’s "gay" jibe. http://transdada.blogspot.com/2006/06/national-security-agency-will-neither.html (7 June 2006).
106.
Templeton, Sarah-Kate.2006. Doctors: Let us kill disabled babies. Sunday Times. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article625477.ece (5 November 2006).
107.
TIME Magazine.1923-2007. Directed by Mark Davies, Brigham Young University. http://corpus.byu.edu/time/. January 5, 2008.
108.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs.1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language65(1). 31-55.
109.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher.2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
110.
Urban Dictionary. 2007. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=spastic (27 November 2007).
111.
van Dijk, Teun.1997. Discourse as social interaction. London : Sage.
112.
What’s offensive: Clarifications. 2005. http://ftmichael.tashari.org/offensive.html (20 July 2007).
113.
Widdowson, Henry.1995a. Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature4(3). 157-172.
114.
Widdowson, Henry.1995b. Review of Fairclough Discourse and social change . Applied Linguistics16(4). 510-516.
115.
Widdowson, Henry.1996. Discourse and interpretation: Conjectures and refutations [Reply to Fairclough 1996]. Language and Literature5(1). 57-69.
116.
Wodak, Ruth.1996. Disorders of discourse. London : Sage.
