American sociolinguists have largely ignored obstruents as invariant, including how speakers distinguish /s, t/ from /z, d/. Upper Midwestern final obstruents provide clear evidence that the realization of such contrasts can and does vary. In a once German-speaking Wisconsin town, we have found that speakers systematically produce final laryngeal distinctions differently than reported for American English, with an apparent partial neutralization of the distinction. Here, we seek the historical antecedents of this pattern, comparing acoustic characteristics of recordings from speakers throughout the region born from 1866–1986. Analysis by date of birth shows distinct obstruent phonetics over this whole period, revealing striking changes in which acoustic cues have been exploited to maintain the distinction: The oldest speakers used primarily glottal pulsing, younger ones exhibit a “trading relation” between pulsing and preceding-vowel duration, and the youngest have reduced the acoustic cues of the distinction dramatically.
Allen, Harold. 1973–79. The Linguistic Atlas of the Upper Midwest. 3 volumes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
Avery, Peter, and William Idsardi. 2001. Laryngeal Dimensions, Completion and Enhancement. In Distinctive Feature Theory, edited by T. Alan Hall, 41–70. Berlin: de Gruyter.
3.
Bregman, Albert S.1990. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Bucholtz, Mary. 1996. “Geek the Girl: Language, Femininity, and Female Nerds.” In Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference, edited by Natasha Warner, Jocelyn Ahlers, Leela Bilmes, Monica Oliver, Suzanne Wertheim, and Melinda Chen, 119–132. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
5.
Calabrese, Andrea, and Morris Halle. 1998. Grimm's and Verner's Laws: A New Perspective. In Mír Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins, edited by Jay Jasanoff, H. Craig Melchert, and Lisi Oliver, 47–62. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Innsbruck.
6.
Cassidy, Frederic G.1948. On Collecting American Dialect. American Speech23: 185–193.
7.
Cassidy, Frederic G., and Joan Houston Hall, eds. 1985. The Dictionary of American Regional English. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8.
Castleman, Wendy A., and Randy L. Diehl. 1996. Effects of Fundamental Frequency on Medial and Final [voice] Judgments. Journal of Phonetics24: 383–398.
9.
Catford, J. C.1977. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
Chen, Matthew. 1970. Vowel Length Variation as a Function of the Voicing of the Consonant Environment. Phonetica22: 129–159.
11.
Crowther, Court S., and Virginia Mann. 1992. Native Language Factors Affecting Use of Vocalic Cues to Final Consonant Voicing in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America92: 711–722.
12.
Davis, Stuart, and Vicki Anderson. 2004. Where American English Meets German: Devoicing in Pennsylvania D(e)ut(s)chified English. Paper presented at the University of Wisconsin.
13.
Denes, Peter B.1955. Effect of Duration on the Perception of Voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America27: 761–764.
14.
Docherty, Gerard J.1992. The Timing of Voicing in British English Obstruents. Berlin: Foris.
15.
Docherty, Gerard J., and Paul Foulkes. 1999. Derby and Newcastle: Instrumental Phonetics and Variationist Studies. In Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, edited by Paul Foulkes and Gerard Docherty, 47–71. London: Arnold.
16.
Eliason, Norman E.1942. Two Notes on Vowel and Consonant Quantity. American Speech17: 166–168.
17.
Fitch, Hollis L., Terry G. Halwes, Donna M. Erickson, and Alvin M. Liberman. 1980. Perceptual Equivalence of Two Acoustic Characteristics for Stop-Consonant Manner. Perception and Psychophysics27: 343–350.
18.
Flege, James E., and Robert Port. 1981. Cross-Language Phonetic Interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech24: 125–146.
19.
Gimson, Alfred C.2001. Gimson's Pronunciation of English. 6th ed., revised by Alan Cruttenden. London: Arnold.
20.
Green, David M.1960. Auditory Detection of a Noise Signal. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America32: 121–131.
21.
Heffner, Roe-Merrill Secrist. 1937. Notes on the Length of Vowels. American Speech12: 128–134.
22.
Heffner, Roe-Merrill Secrist. 1942. Notes on the Length of Vowels (V). American Speech17: 42–48.
23.
Henton, Caroline, Peter Ladefoged, and Ian Maddieson. 1992. Stops in the World's Languages. Phonetica49: 65–101.
24.
Hodgson, Philip, and Joanne L. Miller. 1996. Internal Structure of Phonetic Categories: Evidence for Within-Category Trading Relations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America100: 565–576.
25.
Holsinger, David J. Forthcoming. Germanic Prosody and Consonantal Strength. In Lenition and Fortition, edited by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer, and Philippe Ségéral. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
26.
Honeybone, Patrick. 2001. Lenition Inhibition in Liverpool English. English Language and Linguistics5.2: 213–249.
27.
Honeybone, Patrick. 2002. Germanic Obstruent Lenition: Some Mutual Implications of Theoretical and Historical Phonology. PhD diss., University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
28.
House, Arthur S., and Gordon H. Fairbanks. 1953. The Influence of Consonant Environment upon Secondary Acoustical Characteristics of Vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America25: 105–113.
29.
Iverson, Gregory K., and Joseph C. Salmons. 1995. Aspiration and Laryngeal Representation in Germanic. Phonology12: 369–396.
30.
Iverson, Gregory K., and Joseph C. Salmons. 2003. Laryngeal Enhancement in Early Germanic. Phonology20: 43–74.
31.
Jessen, Michael. 2001. Phonetic Implementation of the Distinctive Auditory Features [voice] and [tense] in Stop Consonants. In Distinctive Feature Theory, edited by T. Alan Hall, 237–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
32.
Jessen, Michael, and Catherine Ringen. 2002. Laryngeal Features in German. Phonology19: 189–218.
33.
Kehrein, Wolfgang, and Chris Golston. 2004. A Prosodic Theory of Laryngeal Contrasts. Phonology21: 325–357.
34.
Kingston, John, and Randy L. Diehl. 1994. Phonetic Knowledge. Language70: 419–454.
35.
Kingston, John, and Randy L. Diehl. 1995. Intermediate Properties in the Perception of Distinctive Feature Values. In Phonology and Phonetic Evidence, edited by Bruce Connell and Amalia Arvaniti, 7–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Knack, Rebecca. 1991. Ethnic Boundaries in Linguistic Variation. In New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change, edited by Penelope Eckert, 251–272. San Diego: Academic Press.
37.
Kohl, Amanda, and Bridget L. Anderson. 2000. Glottalization as a Sociolinguistic Variable in Detroit. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 29, Lansing, MI.
38.
Kohler, Klaus J.1984. Phonetic Explanation in Phonology: The Feature Fortis/ Lenis. Phonetica41: 150–174.
39.
Kurath, Hans, and Raven Ioor McDavid Jr. 1961. The Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States; Based Upon the Collections of the Linguistic Atlas of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
Labov, William, Sharon Ash, and Charles Boberg. 2005. Phonological Atlas of North America: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
42.
Ladefoged, Peter, and Ian Maddieson. 1996. The Sounds of the World's Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
Lehmann, Winfred P., and Roe-Merrill Secrist Heffner. 1943. Notes on the Length of Vowels (VI). American Speech18: 208–215.
44.
Lisker, Leigh. 1957. Closure Duration and the Intervocalic Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in English. Language33: 42–49.
45.
Lisker, Leigh. 1975. Is it VOT or a First-Formant Transition Detector?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America57: 1547–1551.
46.
Lisker, Leigh. 1986. “Voicing” in English: A Catalogue of Acoustic Features Signaling /b/ Versus /p/ in Trochees. Language and Speech29: 3–11.
47.
Lloyd, Harriet. 1936. Note on Vowel Length. American Speech11: 188–189.
48.
Miller, Joanne L.2001. Mapping from Acoustic Signal to Phonetic Category: Internal Category Structure, Context Effects and Speeded Categorization. Language and Cognitive Processes16: 683–690.
49.
Moore, Brian C. J.1997. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. 4th ed.London: Academic Press.
50.
Nittrouer, Susan. 2004. The Role of Temporal and Dynamic Signal Components in the Perception of Syllable-final Stop Voicing by Children and Adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America115: 1777–1790.
51.
Ostergren. Robert C.1997. The Euro-American Settlement of Wisconsin, 1830– 1920. Wisconsin Land and Life, edited by Robert C. Ostergren and Thomas R. Vale, 137–162. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
52.
Parker, Ellen M., Randy L. Diehl, and Keith R. Kluender. 1986. Trading Relations in Speech and Nonspeech. Perception and Psychophysics39: 129–142.
53.
Pederson, Lee. 1977. Studies of American Pronunciation since 1945. American Speech52: 262–327.
54.
Pilus, Zahariah. 2002. Second-language Speech: Production and Perception of Voicing Contrasts in Word-final Obstruents by Malay Speakers of English. Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison.
55.
Podesva, Robert J., Sarah J. Roberts, and Kathryn Campbell-Kibler. 2001. Sharing Resources and Indexing Meanings in the Production of Gay Styles. In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, edited by Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts, and Andrew Wong, 175–189. Palo Alto: CSLI Publications.
56.
Port, Robert. 1976. Influence of Tempo on Closure Interval Cue to Voicing and Place of Intervocalic Stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America59: S41–S42.
57.
Purnell, Thomas C., Joseph C. Salmons, and Dilara Tepeli. 2005. German Substrate Effects in Wisconsin English: Evidence for Final Fortition. American Speech80: 135–164.
58.
Purnell, Thomas C., Dilara Tepeli, Joseph C. Salmons, and Jennifer Mercer. 2004. Regional Variation in American English Final Obstruents. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 33, Ann Arbor, MI.
59.
Raphael, Lawrence J.1972. Preceding Vowel Duration as a Cue to the Perception of the Voicing Characteristic of Word-Final Consonants in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America51: 1296–1303.
60.
Repp, Bruno H.1982. Phonetic Trading Relationships and Context Effects: New Experimental Evidence for a Speech Mode of Perception. Psychological Bulletin92: 81–110.
61.
Repp, Bruno H., and Alvin M. Liberman. 1987. Phonetic Category Boundaries are Flexible. In Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition, edited by Stevan Harnad, 89–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
Repp, Bruno H., Alvin M. Liberman, Thomas Eccardt, and David Pesetsky. 1978. Perceptual Integration of Acoustic Characteristics for Stop, Fricative, and Affricate Manner. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance4: 621–637.
63.
Rositzke, Harry A.1943. The Articulation of Final Stops in General American Speech. American Speech18: 39–42.
64.
Salmons, Joseph C., Dilara Tepeli, and Thomas C. Purnell. Forthcoming. Deutsche Spuren im amerikanischen Englischen. In Sprachinseln, edited by Nina Berend. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
65.
Stevens, Kenneth N., and Sheila E. Blumstein. 1981. The Search for Invariant Acoustic Correlates of Phonetic Features. In Perspectives on the Study of Speech, edited by Peter D. Eimas, and Joanne L. Miller, 1–38. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
Summerfield, Quentin, and Mark Haggard. 1977. Dissociation of Spectral and Temporal Cues to Voicing Distinction in Initial Stop Consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America62: 435–448.
67.
Tepeli, Dilara, Joseph C. Salmons, and Thomas C. Purnell. Forthcoming. Was bleibt bestehen? Der deutsche Einfluß auf das Amerikanische. In Die deutsche Präsenz in den USA / the German Presence in the U.S.A.,edited by Josef Raab and Jan Wirrer. Essen: Die blaue Eule.
68.
Vaux, Bert. 1998. The Laryngeal Specifications of Fricatives. Linguistic Inquiry29: 497–511.
69.
Wayland, Sarah C., Joanne L. Miller, and Lydia E. Volaitis. 1994. The Influence of Sentential Speaking Rate on the Internal Structure of Phonetic Categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America95: 2694–2701.
70.
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin Herzog. 1968. Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, edited by Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.
71.
Westbury, John R.1994. X-ray Microbeam Speech Production Database User's Handbook (version 1.0). Ms., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
72.
Wolfram, Walt. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
73.
Zwicker, Eberhard, and Ernst Terhardt. 1980. Analytical Expressions for Critical-Band Rate and Critical Bandwidth as a Function of Frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68: 1523–1525.
