How household-level data from censuses and surveys are analyzed to study household structure is an issue that has received little attention. The present study proposes a new methodological approach to address this gap. Specifically, we introduce the idea of the household configuration as a mathematical representation of observations from the household roster that uses the tools of sequence analysis to study relationships between household members. This “household configuration approach” is statistically efficient, captures the heterogeneity of family forms in a population, and is computationally simple. An application to Canadian census data for Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples shows that our approach can yield interesting insights into household structure, otherwise not readily obtained.
AbbottA.1995. “Sequence Analysis: Old Methods for New Ideas.” Annual Review of Sociology21:93–113.
2.
AisenbreyS.FasangA. E.. 2010. “New Life for Old Ideas: The “Second Wave” Sequence Analysis, Bringing the “Course” Back into the Life Course.” Sociological Methods and Research38(3):420–62.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2009. 2011 Census of Population and Housing—Nature and Content. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
4.
Bignami-Van AsscheS.AdjwanouV.BouletV.. 2018. “Families’ Living Arrangements in Sub-Saharan Africa: What Do We Really Know? Findings from an Innovative Approach.” Paper presented at the 2018 Meeting of the Population Association of America, Denver, Colorado, May 1.
5.
Bignami-Van AsscheS.BouletV.SimardC. O.. 2018. “Rethinking Indigenous Families: An Analysis of the 2011 National Household Survey.” Paper presented at the 2018 Meetingof the Association des démographes du Québec, Montréal, Québec, May 14.
6.
Bignami-Van AsscheS.BouletV.SimardC. O.. 2019. “Trends in Living Arrangements in Canada: A Comparison of Indigenous Peoples and Non-Indigenous Canadians.” Paper presented at the 2019 Meeting of the Population Association of America, Austin, Texas, April 13.
7.
Bignami-Van AsscheS.SimardC.O.. 2020. “Indigenous Families in Canada: A Tale of Statistical Disadvantage.” Canadian Studies in Population, 47(1-2): 119–130.
8.
BillariF.C.2001. “The Analysis of Early Life Courses: Complex Description of the Early Transition to Adulthood.” Journal of Population Research18(2):119–42.
9.
BougieE.2010. “Family, Community, and Aboriginal Language among Young First Nations Children Living Off Reserve in Canada.” Canadian Social Trends90:75–85.
10.
BrownS. L.ManningW. D.. 2009. “Family Boundary Ambiguity and the Measurement of Family Structure: The Significance of Cohabitation,” Demography46:85-101.
11.
Brzinsky-FayC.KohlerU.LuniakM.. 2006. “Sequence Analysis with Stata.” The Stata Journal6(4):435–60.
12.
CastellanoM. B.2002. Aboriginal Family Trends: Extended Families, Nuclear Families, Families of the Heart. Ottawa, ON: Vanier Institute of the Family.
13.
ClokeJ.2007. “Gender, Taboo and Deceit: The Alternative Truths of Household Research.” GeoJournal70(1):33–45.
14.
DawsonP. C. 2006. “Seeing Like an Inuit Family: The Relationship between House Form and Culture in Northern Canada.” Études/Inuit/Studies30(2):113–35.
15.
GabadinhoA.RitschardG.StuderM.MüllerN. S.. 2009. Mining Sequence Data in R with the TraMineR Package: A User’s Guide for Version 1.2. Geneva, Switzerland: University of Geneva.
16.
HofferthS. L.Casper LynneM.. 2007. Handbook of Measurement Issues in Family Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
HullJ.2001. Les Mères seules Autochtones au Canada, 1996: Un Profil Statistique. Ottawa, Canada: Ministère des Affaires indiennes et du Nord Canada [Direction de la recherche et de l’analyse].
18.
LesthaegheR.1995. “The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: An Interpretation.” Pp. 17–62Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries, edited by MasonKaren OppenheimJensenAn-Magritt. New York: Clarendon Press.
19.
LesthaegheR.2010. “The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition.” Population and Development Review36(2):211–51.
20.
LocohT.1988. “L’évolution de la famille en Afrique.” Pp. 45–66 in L’état de la population africaine, edited by Van de WalleESala- DiakanaM. D.OhadikeP. O.. Liège, Belgium: UIESP.
21.
ManningW. D.SmockP. J.. 2005. “Measuring and Modeling Cohabitation: New Perspectives from Qualitative Data.” Journal of Marriage and Family67:989-1002.
22.
PeersL.BrownJ. S.. 1999. “‘There Is No End to Relationship among the Indians’ Ojibwa Families and Kinship in Historical Perspective.” The History of the Family4(4):529–55.
23.
QuinlessJ. M.2013. “First Nations Teenaged Female Lone Parent Families in Canada: Recognizing Family Diversity and the Importance of Networks of Care.” International Indigenous Policy Journal4(1)1–15.
24.
RandallS.CoastE.. 2015. “Poverty in African Households: The Limits of Survey and Census Representations.” The Journal of Development Studies51(2):161–77.
25.
RandallS.CoastE.LeoneT. 2011. “Cultural Constructions of the Concept of Household in Sample Surveys.” Population Studies65(2):217–29.
26.
RaoN. J. U.1992. “Gaps in Definitions and Analysis: A Sociological Perspective.” Pp. 49–74inFinding the Household: Conceptual and Methodological Issues, edited by SaradamoniK.. New Delhi and London: Sage.
27.
SankoffD.KruskalJ. B. (eds.). 1983. Time Warps, String Edits and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Statistics Canada. 2012a. Fifty Years of Families in Canada, 1961–2011 (Catalogue no. 98-312-X2011003). Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada.
31.
Statistics Canada. 2012b. Portrait of Families and Living Arrangements in Canada—Families, Households and Marital Status, 2011 Census of Population (Catalogue no. 98-312-X2011001). Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada.
32.
Statistics Canada. 2016. Portrait of Families and Living Arrangements in Canada—2016 Census of Population (Catalogue no. CS11-627/2017-24E). Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada.
33.
StewartS. D.2005. “Boundary Ambiguity in Stepfamilies.” Journal of Family Issues26:1002-29.
34.
TichitC.RobetteN.. 2009. Understanding the Family Composition of Households in Demographic and Health Surveys. Paris, France: Éditions du CEPED.
35.
TurnerA.2016. Living Arrangements of Aboriginal Children Aged 14 and Under. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada.
36.
United Nations. 2005. Designing Household Survey Samples: Practical Guidelines. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, Studies in Method, Serie F., No. 28. New York: United Nations.
37.
United Nations. 2010. Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses—Revision 3. New York: United Nations.
38.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2015. Conference of European Statisticians Recommendations for the 2020 Censuses of Population and Housing. Geneva, Switzerland: UNECE.
van de WalleE.2006. “Introduction.” Pp. xxi–xxxix in African Households: Censuses and Surveys, edited by van de WalleE.. New York: Sharpe.
41.
WatermanM. S.1995. Introduction to Computational Biology. Maps, Sequences and Genomes. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
