A multilevel regression model is proposed in which discrete individual-level variables are used as predictors of discrete group-level outcomes. It generalizes the model proposed by Croon and van Veldhoven for analyzing micro–macro relations with continuous variables by making use of a specific type of latent class model. A first simulation study shows that this approach performs better than more traditional aggregation and disaggreagtion procedures. A second simulation study shows that the proposed latent variable approach still works well in a more complex model, but that a larger number of level-2 units is needed to retain sufficient power. The more complex model is illustrated with an empirical example in which data from a personal network are used to analyze the interaction effect of being religious and surrounding yourself with married people on the probability of being married.
AgrestiAlan. 2007. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
2.
BakkZsuzsaTekleFeteneVermuntJeroen K.. 2013. “Estimating the Association between Latent Class Membership and External Variables using Bias Adjusted Three-step Approaches.”Sociological Methodology 43: 277–316.
3.
BartholomewDavid J.KnottMartin. 1999. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis: Kendall’s Library of Statistics 7. London: Arnold.
CroonMarcel A.VeldhovenMarc J. P. M. van. 2007. “Predicting Group-level Outcome Variables from Variables Measured at the Individual Level: A Latent Variable Multilevel Model.”Psychological Methods12:45–57.
6.
CurranPatrick J.2003. “Have Multilevel Models Been Structural Equation Models All Along?”Multivariate Behavioral Research38:529–69.
7.
DeShonRichard P.KozlowskiSteve W. J.SchmidtAaron M.MilnerKaren R.WiechmannDarin. 2004. “Multiple-goal Multilevel Model of Feedback Effects on the Regulation of Individual and Team Performance.”Journal of Applied Psychology89:1035–56.
8.
EggebeenDavidDewJeffrey. 2009. “The Role of Religion in Adolescence for Family Formation in Young Adulthood.”Journal of Marriage and Family71:108–21.
9.
EmbersonSusan E.ReiseSteven P.. 2000. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
FoxJean-Paul. 2005. “Multilevel IRT using Dichotomous and Polytomous Items.”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology58:145–72.
11.
FoxJean-PaulGlasCees A. W.. 2003. “Bayesian Modeling of Measurement Error in Predictor Variables using Item Response Theory.”Psychometrika68:169–91.
GoodmanLeo A.1973. “The Analysis of Multidimensional Contingency Tables When Some Variables are Posterior to Others: A Modified Path Analysis Approach”Biometrika60:179–92.
14.
HagenaarsJacques A. P.1990. Categorical Longitudinal Data: A Loglinear Analysis of Panel, Trend and Cohort Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
HagenaarsJacques A. P.Allan LMcCutcheon.. Ed. 2002. Applied Latent Class Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HoxJoop J.Kyle RobertsJ.. 2011. Handbook of Advanced Multilevel Analysis. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
KalmijnMatthijsVermuntJeroen K.. 2007. “Homogeneity of Social Networks by Age and Marital Status: A Multilevel Analysis of Ego-centered Networks.”Social Networks29:25–43.
19.
KeithTimothy Z.2005. Multiple Regression and Beyond. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
LüdtkeOliverMarshHerbert W.RobitzschAlexanderTrautweinUlrichAsparouhovTihomirMuthénBengt. 2008. “The Multilevel Latent Covariate Model: A New, More Reliable Approach to Group-level Effects in Contextual Studies.”Psychological Methods13:203–29.
22.
LüdtkeOliverMarshHerbert W.RobitzschAlexanderTrautweinUlrich. 2011. “A 2 x 2 Taxonomy of Multilevel Latent Contextual Models: Accuracy-bias Trade-offs in Full and Partial Error Correction Models.”Psychological Methods16:444–67.
23.
LukočienėOlgaVarrialeRobertaVermuntJeroen K.. 2010. “The Simultaneous Decision(s) About the Number of Lower- and Higher-level Classes in Multilevel Latent Class Analysis.”Sociological Methodology40:247–83.
24.
MacKinnonDavid P.2008. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, Taylor & Francis Group.
25.
McClellandGary H.JuddCharles M.. 1993. “Statistical Difficulties of Detecting Interactions and Moderator Effects.”Psychological Bullitin114:376–90.
PearlJudea. 2009. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
RasbashJonCharltonChristopherBrowneWilliam J.HealyMichaelCameronBruce. 2005. MLwiN Version 2.02. Bristol, England: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
30.
RutterMichaelMaughanBarbara. 2002. “School Effectiveness Findings 1979-2002.”Journal of School Psychology40:451–75.
SnijdersTom A. B.BoskerRoel J.. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
33.
SnijdersTom A. B.SpreenMarinusZwaagstraRonald. 1995. “The Use of Multilevel Modeling for Analysis of Personal Networks: Networks of Cocaine Users in an Urban Area.”Journal of Quantitative Anthropology5:85–105.
34.
vanDuijnMarijtjeA. J.BusschbachJooske T vanSnijdersTom A.B. 1999. “Multilevel Analysis of Personal Networks as Dependent Variables.”Social Networks21:187–209.
35.
vanVeldhovenJ. P. MMarc.. 2005. “Financial Performance and the Long-term Link with HR Practices, Work Climate and Job Stress.”Human Resource Management Journal15:30–53.
WallerMary J.ConteJeffrey M.GibsonCristina B.CarpenterMason A.. 2001. “The Effect of Individual Perceptions of Deadlines on Team Performance.”The Academy of Management Review26:586–600.
38.
WhismanMark A.McClellandGary H.. 2005. “Designing, Testing, and Interpreting Interactions and Moderator Effects in Family Research.”Journal of Family Psychology19:111–20.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
