This article contributes to the literature on comparative methods in the social sciences by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of regression analysis and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) for studies with a moderately large-n (between approximately 50 and 100). Moderately large-n studies are interesting in this respect since they allow for regression analysis as well as fsQCA analysis. These two approaches have a different epistemological foundation and thereby answer different, yet related, research questions. To illustrate the comparison of fsQCA and regression analysis empirically, I use a recent data set (n = 53) that includes data on the conditions under which governments in Western democracies increase their spending on active labor market policies (ALMPs). This comparison demonstrates that while each approach has merits and demerits, fsQCA leads to a fuller understanding of the conditions under which the outcome occurs.
AmentaEdwinPoulsenJane D.1996. “Social Politics in Context: The Institutional Political Theory and Social Spending at the End of the New Deal.” Social Forces75:33-61.
2.
ArmingeonKlaus. 2007. “Active Labour Market Policy, International Organizations and Domestic Politics.”Journal of European Public Policy14:905-32.
Berg-SchlosserDirkDe MeurGiseleRihouxBenoitRaginCharles C.2009. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an Approach.” Pp. 1-18 in Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, edited by RihouxBenoitRaginCharles C., Los Angeles: SAGE.
6.
BonoliGiuliano. 2008. “The Political Economy of Activation: Explaining Cross-national Variation in Active Labour Market Policy.” Working Paper De l’IDHEAP1-21.
BraumoellerBear F.2003. “Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics.” Political Analysis11:209-33.
9.
BraumoellerBear F.2004. “Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms.” International Organization58:807-20.
10.
BraumoellerBear F.GoertzGary. 2000. “The Methodology of Necessary Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science44:844-58.
11.
BraumoellerBear F.GoertzGary. 2003. “The Statistical Methodology of Necessary Conditions.” Pp. 197-223 in Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, edited by GoertzG.StarrH.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
12.
BudgeIanKlingemannHans-DieterVolkensAndreaBaraJudithTanenbaumEric. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
ClarkWilliam RobertsGilliganMichael J.GolderMatt. 2006. “A Simple Multivariate Test for Asymmetric Hypotheses.” Political Analysis14:311-31.
14.
ClasenJochen. 2005. Reforming European Welfare States: Germany and the United Kingdom Compared. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
CollierDavidGerringJohn, eds. (2009). Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. London: Routledge.
16.
DulJanHakTonyGoertzGaryVossChris. 2010. “Necessary Condition Hypotheses in Operations Management.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management30:1170-90.
17.
EpsteinJessicaDuerrDanielKenworthyLaneRaginCharles. 2008. “Comparative Employment Performance: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis.” Pp. 67-90 in Method and Substance in Macrocomparative Analysis, edited by KenworthyL.HicksA.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
FordE. W.DuncanW. J.GinterP. M.2005. “Health Departments’ Implementation of Public Health’s Core Functions: An Assessment of Health Impacts.” Public Health119:11-21.
19.
HuberEvelynStephensJohn D.2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
KenworthyLaneHicksAlexander. 2008. “Introduction.” Pp. 1-28 in Method and Substance in Macrocomparative Analysis, edited by KenworthyL.HicksA.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
MackieJohn L.[1974] 1980. The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
MahoneyJames. 2004. “Reflections on Fuzzy-set/QCA.” Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods2:17-21.
24.
MahoneyJames. 2008. “Towards a Unified Theory of Causality.” Comparative Political Studies4/5:412-36.
25.
MahoneyJames. 2010. “After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research.” World Politics62:120-47.
26.
MahoneyJamesGoertzGary. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” Political Analysis14:227-49.
27.
OECD. 2003. Employment Outlook: Towards More and Better Jobs. Paris: OECD.
28.
OECD. 2006. Boosting Jobs and Incomes: Policy Lessons from Reassessing the OECD Jobs Strategy. Paris: OECD.
29.
RaginCharles C.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
RaginCharles C.2000. Fuzzy-set Social Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
RaginCharles C.2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
32.
RaginCharles C.RihouxBenoît. 2004. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): State of the Art and Prospects.” Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods2:3-13.
33.
ReichenbachHans. 1956. The Direction of Time. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
34.
RihouxBenoît. 2006. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research.” International Sociology21:679-706.
35.
RihouxBenoîtRaginCharles C., eds. 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
RihouxBenoîtRaginCharles C.YamasakiSakuraBolDamian. 2009. “Conclusion—The Way(s) Ahead.” Pp. 167-77 in Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, edited by RihouxB.RaginC. C.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
RohwerGötz. 2010. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Discussion of Interpretations.” European Sociological Review. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcq03410.1093/esr/jcq034.
38.
RuedaDavid. 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
SartoriGiovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review64:1033-53.
40.
SchneiderCarsten Q.WagemannClaudius. 2010. “Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-sets.” Comparative Sociology9:397-418.
41.
SimonHerbert A.1952. “On the Definition of the Causal Relationship.” The Journal of Philosophy49:517-28.
42.
SimonHerbert A.HerbertA.1954. “Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association49:467-79.
43.
SimonHerbert A.RescherNicholas. 1966. “Cause and Counterfactual.” Philosophy of Science33:323-40.
44.
SuppesPatrick. 1970. A Probabilistic Theory of Causality. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
45.
VisBarbara. 2010. Politics of Risk-taking: Welfare State Reform in Advanced Democracies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
46.
VisBarbara. 2011. “Under Which Conditions Does Spending on Active Labor Market Policies Increase? A FsQCA Analysis of 53 Governments between 1985 and 2003.” European Political Science Review3:229-52.
47.
WagemannClaudiusSchneiderCarsten Q.2010. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-sets: Agenda for a Research Approach and a Data Analysis Technique.” Comparative Sociology9:376-96.
48.
WinshipChristopherMorganStephen L.1999. “The Estimation of Causal Effects from Observational Data.” Annual Review of Sociology25:659-707.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
