Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The author discusses the general problem of evaluating differences in adjusted survivor functions and develops a heuristic approach to generate the expected events that would occur under a Cox proportional hazards model. Differences in the resulting expected survivor distributions can be tested using generalized log rank tests. This method should prove useful for making other kinds of comparisons and generating adjusted life tables. The author also discusses alternative specifications of the classical Cox model that allow time-varying effects and thus permit a more direct assessment of group differences at various points in time. He implements recently developed semiparametric approaches for estimating time-varying effects, which permit statistical tests of group difference in effects as well as tests of time-invariant effects. He shows that these approaches can provide insight into the nature of time-varying effects and can help reveal the temporal dynamic of group differences.

Keywords

survival analysis Cox proportional hazards models group differences adjusted life tables log rank tests

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aalen, O.O. 1976. ‘‘Nonparametric Inference in Connection With Multiple Decrement Models.’’ Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 3:15-27.

Aalen O.O. 1978. ‘‘Nonparametric Inference for a Family of Counting Processes.’’ Annals of Statistics 6:701-26.

Aalen, O.O. 1989. ‘‘A Linear Regression Model for the Analysis of Life Times.’’ Statistics in Medicine 8:907-25.

Aalen, O.O. 1993. ‘‘Further Results on the Non-Parametric Linear Regression Model in Survival Analysis.’’ Statistics in Medicine 12:1509-88.

Aalen, O.O., Borgan, , and H.K. Gjessing. 2008. Survival and Event History Analysis: A Process Point of View. New York: Springer.

Aitken, M. and D. Clayton. 1980. ‘‘The Fitting of Exponential, Weibull, and Extreme Value Distributions to Complex Survival Data Using GLIM. ’’ Applied Statistics 29:156-63.

Andersen, P.K. , . Borgan, R. D. Gill , and N. Keiding. 1993. Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes. New York: Springer.

Breslow, N. 1970. ‘‘A Generalized Kruskal-Wallis Test for Comparing K Samples Subject to Unequal Pattern of Censorship.’’ Biometrika 57:579-94.

Cox, D.R. 1972. ‘‘Regression Models and Life Tables (With Discussion).’’ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, SeriesB 26:103-10.

10.

Cox, D.R. and D. Oakes. 1984. Analysis of Survival Data. London: Chapman and Hall.

11.

Gehan, E.A. 1956. ‘‘A Generalized Wilcoxon Test for Comparing Arbitrarily Singly-Censored Samples.’’ Biometrika 52:203-23.

12.

Grambsch, P.M. and T.M. Therneau. 1994. ‘‘Proportional Hazards Tests and Diagnostics Based on Weighted Residuals.’’ Biometrika 81:515-26.

13.

Harrington, D.P. , and T.R. Flemming. 1982. ‘‘A Class of Rank Test Procedures for Censored Survival Data.’’ Biometrika 69:133-43.

14.

Hastie, T. and R. Tibshirani. 1993. ‘‘Varying Coefficient Models.’’ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 55:757-96.

15.

Heller, G. and E.S. Venkatraman. 1996. ‘‘Resampling Procedures to Compare Two Survival Distributions in the Presence of Right Censored Data.’’ Biometrics 52:1204-13.

16.

Holford, T. 1976. ‘‘Life Tables With Concomitant Information .’’ Biometrics 32:587-97.

17.

Holford, T. 1980. ‘‘The Analysis of Rates and of Survivorship Using Log-Linear Models.’’ Biometrics 36:299-305.

18.

Hosmer, D. , S. Lemeshow , and S. May. 2008. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.

19.

Kalbfleisch, J.D. , and R.L. Prentice. 1980. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York: Wiley.

20.

Kaplan, E.L. and P. Meier. 1958. ‘‘Nonparametric Estimation From Incomplete Observations.’’ Journal of the American Statistical Association 55:457-81.

21.

Laird, N. and D. Oliver. 1981. ‘‘Covariance Analysis of Censored Survival Data Using Log-Linear Analysis Techniques.’’ Journal of the American Statistical Association 76:231-40.

22.

Mantel, N. 1966. ‘‘Evaluation of Survival Data and Two New Rank Order Statistics Arising in Its Consideration.’’ Cancer Chemotherapy Report 50:163-70.

23.

Mantel, N. and W. Haenszel. 1959. ‘‘Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease.’’ Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22:719-48.

24.

Martinussen, T. and T.H. Scheike. 2006. Dynamic Regression Models for Survival Data. New York: Springer.

25.

Martinussen, T. , T.H. Scheike , and I.M. Skovgaard. 2002. ‘‘Efficient Estimation of Fixed and Time-Varying Covariate Effects in Multiplicative Intensity Models .’’ Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 29:57-74.

26.

Peto, R. and J. Peto. 1972. ‘‘Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures (With Discussion).’’ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 135:185-206.

27.

Peto, R. and M.C. Pike. 1973. ‘‘Conservatism of the Approximation (O - E)2 / E in the Log Rank Test for Survival Data or Tumor Incidence Data. ’’ Biometrics 29:579-84.

28.

Powers, D.A. and Y. Xie. 2008. Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed. London, England: Emerald Books.

29.

Prentice, R.L. 1982. ‘‘Linear Rank Tests With Right Censored Data .’’ Biometrika 65:167-69.

30.

R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing . (http://www.R-project.org)

31.

Savage, I.R. 1956. ‘‘Contributions to the Theory of Rank Order Statistics-The Two-Sample Case.’’ Annals of Mathematical Statistics 27:590-615.

32.

Scheike, T.H. and T. Martinussen. 2004. ‘‘On Estimation and Tests of Time-Varying Effects in the Proportional Hazards Model.’’ Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 31:51-62.

33.

Scheike, T. , T. Martinussen , and J. Silver. 2009. ‘‘timereg: timereg Package for Flexible Regression Models for Survival.’’ R Package Version 1.2-2. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing . (http://www.R-project.org)

34.

Scheike, T.H. and M.-J. Zhang. 2003. ‘‘Extensions and Applications of the Cox-Aalen Survival Model.’’ Biometrics 59:1036-45.

35.

Strayhorn, J.M. and J.C. Strayhorn. 2009. ‘‘Religiosity and Teen Birth Rate in the United States.’’ Reproductive Health, 6:14 (doi:10.1186/1732-4755-6-14).

36.

Studer, M. and A. Thornton. 1987. ‘‘Adolescent Religiosity and Contraceptive Usage.’’ Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:172-82.

37.

Tarone, R. and J. Ware. 1977. ‘‘On Distribution Free Tests for Equality of Survival Distributions.’’ Biometrika 64:156-60.

38.

Therneau, T.M. and P.M. Grambsch. 2000. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York: Springer.

39.

Vermunt, J.K. 1996. Loglinear Event History analysis: A General Approach With Missing Data, Unobserved Heterogeneity, and Latent Variables. PhD thesis. Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

40.

Vermunt, J.K. 1997. Log-Linear Models for Event Histories. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.

41.

Whitehead, B.D. , B.L. Wilcox , S.S. Rostosky , B. Randall , and M.L.C. Wright. 2001. Keeping the Faith: The Role of Religion and Faith Communities in Preventing Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.

42.

Winnett, A. and P. Sasieni. 2001. ‘‘A Note on Scaled Schoenfeld Residuals for the Proportional Hazards Model.’’ Biometrika 88:565-71.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

0.08 MB