The Rhetoric of Development and Resistance by Tribal Women in Kashipur

Abstract

In the post-Independence era, development has been one of the key goals of the Indian state. Development is often seen as being synonymous with the process of modernisation and economic growth. Such a version of development has undoubtedly benefitted a few capitalists and layers of the middle class, yet it has remained in the realm of rhetoric for a large section of India’s tribal population. Development through mega projects displaces a large number of people. Displacement without adequate rehabilitation and compensation further aggravates the situation. In Odisha since 1993, few multinational and national companies have tried setting up mining projects in Kashipur. Many tribal villagers have protested strongly against these proposed projects from an egalitarian, environmental and social justice perspective. Significantly, women have remained in the forefront of these movements airing their concern. The article takes the case study of the Kashipur movement and critically analyses the role of women and their involvement in the struggle.

Keywords

Development displacement capitalism resistance and gender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agarwal

(1992). The gender and environment debate: Lessons from India. Feminist Studies, 18(1), 119–158.

Census (2011). Sex Ratio in India. Retrieved from https://www.census2011.co.in/sexratio.php

Cernea, Mi.

(1990). Poverty Risks from Population Displacement In Water Resources Development (HIID Development Discussion Paper No. 355). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

Cernea, Mi.

(1996). Public Policy Responses to Development-Induced Population Displacement. Economic & Political Weekly, 311515–311523.

Debi

, & Mahesh

(2012). Development of education of Scheduled Tribes in Orissa: The role of PESA Act (CMDR Monograph Series No.52). Dharwad, Karnataka: CMDR.

Desai

(Ed.). (1988). A decade of women’s movement in India. New Delhi: Himalaya Publishing.

Desai

, & Krishnaraj

(Eds.). (1987). Women and society in India. New Delhi: Ajanta Publications.

Desai

, & Patel

(1985). Indian women: Change and challenge in the international decade, 1975–85. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.

Dietrich

(1992). Reflections on the women’s movement in India: Religion, ecology, development. New Delhi: Horizon India Books.

10.

Dube

(1997). Women and kinship: Comparative perspectives on gender in south and South-East Asia. New York, NY: United Nations University Press.

11.

Fernandes

(2004). Rehabilitation policy for the displaced. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(12), 1476–1485.

12.

Gandhi

, & Shah

(1992). Issues at stake: Theory and practice in the contemporary women’s movement in India. Delhi: Kali for Women.

13.

Haan

A. D.

, & Dubey

(2005). Orissa: Poverty, Disparities, or the Development of Underdevelopment? Economic & Political Weekly, 40(22/23), 2321–2329.

14.

Jogdand

P. G.

(Ed.). (1995). Dalit women: Issues and perspectives. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House and University of Poona.

15.

Kohli

(Ed.). (2001). The success of India’s democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Kothari

(1996). Whose nation? The displaced as the victims of development. Economic & Political Weekly, 31(24), 1476–1485.

17.

Kumar

(1993). The history of doing: An illustrated account of movements for women’s rights and feminism in India, 1800–1990. New Delhi: Kali for Women.

18.

Kumar

(2001). Adivasis of south Orissa: Enduring poverty. Economic & Political Weekly, 36(43), 4052–4054.

19.

MacCallum

G. C.

Jr. (1967). Negative and positive freedom. Philosophical Review, 76(4), 312–334.

20.

Mohanty

(1995). Comparative political theory and third world sensitivity. Journal of Teaching Politics, 12(2), 22–37.

21.

Nongbri

(2000). Khasi Women and Matriliny: Transformations in Gender Relations. Gender, Technology and Development, 4(3), 359–395.

22.

Padel

, & Das

(2008). Orissa’s highland clearance: The reality gap in R & R. Social Change, 38(4), 576–806.

23.

Parasuraman

(1996). Development projects, displacement and outcomes for displaced two case studies. Economic & Political Weekly, 31(24), 1529–1532.

24.

Phadke

(2003). Thirty years on: Women’s studies reflect on the women’s movement. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(43), 4567–4576.

25.

Rege

(2003). More than Just Taking Women on to the Macropicture: Feminist Contributions to Globalisation Discourses. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(43), 4555–4563.

26.

Sahaee

(2003). National rehabilitation policy: Many loopholes. Economic & Political Weekly, 42(8), 3103–3107.

27.

Saroj (2008). Kashipur andolan. Bikalp Bichar, July-December 2007.

28.

Sen

, & Correa

(2000). Gender justice and economic justice: Reflections on the five-year reviews of the UN Conferences of the 1990s. Paper prepared for UNIFEM in preparation for the five-year review of the Beijing Platform of Action.

29.

Sen

(1990). A space within the struggle: Women’s participation in people’s movement. New Delhi: Kali for Women.

30.

Sharma

(2003). Institutionalising feminist agenda(s). Economic & Political Weekly, 38(43), 4564–4566.

31.

Subramaniam

(2004). The Indian women’s movement. Contemporary Sociology, 33(6), 635–639.

32.

The Hindu (2017). Bauxite Vs homelands. Retrieved from https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/bauxite-versus-homelands/article18304064.ece