The regulation of an intimate family relationship to control and prevent violence against women in the domestic space is analysed as an instance of interference by the state to regulate and monitor a hitherto ‘private’ space. This article explores to what extent can the interference of law help suppressed women to use law as a tool to change situations of familial violence and thereby enhance their capacity to engage with the ‘male space’ of courtrooms? The ‘result’ from the whole legal and judicial process may not give a solution to the ‘violence’ they have undergone but the courtroom and client counselling experience reveals that it does provoke the woman to think in terms of emancipation. The everyday practice of domestic violence law in the lower courts of Kozhikode (Calicut), Kerala has been analysed in this article.
AgnesF. (1992). Protecting women against violence: Review of a decade of legislation, 1980–89. Economic & Political Weekly, 27(17), 19–33.
2.
AhujaR. (1998). Violence against women. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
3.
AravindanK.P. (Ed.). (2006). Kerala Padanam: Keralam Engane Jeevikkunnu, Keralam Engane Chinthinikkunnu. Kozhikode: Kerala Shastra Sahithya Parishad.
4.
CampbellJ.C. (1989). Women’s responses to sexual abuse in intimate relationships. Health Care Women International, 10(4), 335–346.
5.
DevikaJ. (2010). Egalitarian developmentalism, communist mobilisation and the question of caste in Kerala state, India. Journal of Asian Studies, 69(3), 799–820.
6.
DorothyS. (1997). Wife abuse and family idealisation. In RonaiC.R., ZsembikB. & FeaginJ. (Eds), Everyday sexism in the third millennium (pp. 105–137). New York: Routledge.
7.
EllsbergM.C. (1999). Wife abuse among women of childbearing age in Nicaragua. American Journal of Public Health, 89(2), 241–244.
8.
GoV.F., JohnsonS.C., BentleyM.E., SivaramS., SrikrishnanA.K., CelentanoD.D., . (2003). Crossing the threshold: Engendered definitions of socially acceptable domestic violence in Chennai, India. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5(5), 393–408.
9.
HeiseL.L., PitanguyJ., & GermainA. (1994). Violence against women: The hidden health burden (World Bank Discussion Paper No. 255). Washington, DC: World Bank.
10.
HoffL. (1990). Battered women as survivors. London: Routledge.
11.
HotalingG.T., & SugarmanD.B. (1990). A risk maker analysis of assaulted wives. Journal of Family Violence, 5(1), 1–14.
12.
International Center for Research on Women (ICRW). (2000). Domestic violence in India: A summary report of a multi-site survey. Washington, DC: ICRW.
13.
JayasreeA.K. (2004). Searching for justice for body and self in a coercive environment: Sex work in Kerala, India. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(23), 58–67.
14.
JejeebhoyS.J., & CookR.J. (1997). State accountability for wife-beating: The Indian challenge. Lancet, 349(supplement 1), S110–S112.
15.
KirkwoodC. (1993). Leaving abusive partners: From the scars of survivors to the wisdom for change. London: SAGE.
16.
Lawyers Collective. (2007). Staying alive: First monitoring and evaluation report, PWDVA, 2005.
17.
Lawyers Collective and The International Centre for Research on Women. (2009). Staying alive. Third monitoring & evaluation report 2009 on the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, New Delhi.
18.
Lazarus-BlackM. (2001). Law and the pragmatics of inclusion: Governing domestic violence in Trinidad and Tobago. American Ethnologist, 28(2), 388–416.
19.
MartinS.L., TsuiA.O., MaitraK., & MarinshawR. (1999). Domestic violence in Northern India. American Journal of Epidemiology, 150(4), 417–426.
20.
MirchandaniR. (2006). ‘Hitting is not manly’: Domestic violence court and the re-imagination of the patriarchal state. Gender and Society, 20(6), 781–804.
21.
NavedR.T., & PerssonL.A. (2005). Associated with spousal physical violence against women in Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 36(4), 289–300.
22.
PurkayasthaB., SubramaniamM., DesaiM., & BoseS. (2003). The study of gender in India: A partial review. Gender and Society, 17(4), 503–524.
23.
ShieldsN., & HannekeC. (1983). Battered wives’ reactions to marital rape. In FinkelhorD., GellesR.J., HotalingG.T. & StausM.A. (Eds), The dark side of families: Current family violence research (pp. 132–148). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
24.
StrausM.A., GellesR.J., & SteinmetzS.K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in American family. New York: Doubleday/Anchor.
25.
StrausM.A., & SmithC. (1990). Violence in Hispanic families in the United States: Incidence rates and structural interpretations. In StrausM.A. & GellesR.J. (Eds), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 341–367). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
26.
WarringtonM. (2001). ‘I must get out’: The geographies of domestic violence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 26(3), 365–382.
27.
WilliamsP. (1987). Constituting class and gender: A social history of the home 1900–1901. In ThriftN. & WilliamsP. (Eds), Class and space: The making of urban society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
