In any science the meaning given to concepts and the way they are used profoundly influence the formulation of problems and the manner of seeking solutions. This article based on the experiences of an economics teacher of long-standing innings, traces the distortions introduced into the discipline of economics, legitimised by a long tradition of economists who tried to make it a science like physics with universally valid postulates and principles. In this process the discipline has strayed away from social reality which quintessentially is rooted in social relationships. No wonder development economics has no crucial contribution or critical role to play in conquering under development, inequality and unfreedoms that have undermined the tremendous flourishings which the general mass of humanity could have accomplished over the years. It is in this setting that the article underscores the significance of development as freedom, equality, care and social inclusion.
AlkireSabina (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AllardtErik (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In NussbaumM.SenA. (Eds), The quality of life (pp. 88–94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
IfzalAliJuzhongZhuang (2007). ‘Inclusive Growth toward a prosperous Asia: Policy Implications’, ERD Working Paper Series No.97, Asian Development Bank. (downloaded from the website: http://www.adb.org/Documents/ERD/Working_Papers/WP097.pdf)
4.
ArrighiGiovanni (1991). World income inequalities and the future of socialism. New Left Review, 189 (September–October).
5.
BanerjeeAbhijitDufloEsther (2011). Poor economics: Rethinking poverty and the ways to end it. New Delhi: Random House.
6.
BhattV.V. (1958). Techniques, employment and rate of growth. The Economic Journal, 68(271): 581–85.
7.
Coase RonaldH. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1–44.
8.
DebreuGerard (1959). Theory of value: An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
9.
EriksonRobert (1993). Commentator: Bengt–Christer Ysander. In NussbaumM.SenA. (Eds), The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 88–133.
10.
GalbraithJohn K. (1979). The nature of mass poverty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
KurienC.T. (1992). The economy—An interpretative introduction. New Delhi: SAGE.
13.
KuznetsSimon. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1): 1–28.
14.
LewisW. Arthur (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22(May): 139–91.
15.
MankiwGregory. (2005[2009]). Principles of economics (3rd edition) Fort Worth: Dryden Publications.
16.
NussbaumMartha C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
NussbaumMartha C. (2007). Frontiers of justice. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (1987). Teaching of economics in Indian universities. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH.
19.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (1992). Economics, economy and the market friendly paradigm. Discussion Paper No. 1, Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi.
20.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2000). Amartya Sen’s human science of development: An introduction (in Malayalam). Kerala: The State Institute of Language.
21.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2004). Economic justice, globalisation and quest for alternatives. New Delhi: Konark Publishers.
22.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2006). The Dreze’ Sen theory of public action and Kerala’s development experience. In TharamangalamJoseph (Ed.), Kerala: The paradox of public action and development. New Delhi: Orient Longman, pp. 338–59.
23.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2008a). Reforms and the Kerala model. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(2): 22–25.
24.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2008b). Reform and the Kerala model: A critique based on Sen’s capability approach. Paper presented at the 20th ECMSAS conference, 8–11 July, Manchester, UK.
25.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2008c). Capabilities, reform and the Kerala ‘model’. Paper presented at the annual conference of Human Development and Capability Association, 9–13 September, New Delhi.
26.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2009). Development as freedom: Towards a Christian understanding. 16th M.A. Thomas Memorial Lecture, 25 July, Ecumenical Christian Centre, Bangalore.
27.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2010a). Freedom, economic reform and the Kerala ‘model’. In RamanRavi (Ed.), Development, democracy and the state: Critiquing the Kerala model of development. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 71–86.
28.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2010b). Development, freedom and democracy: An appreciative reading of Amartya Sen. 18th Fr. Zacharias Memorial Lecture, Pontifical Institute of Theology & Philosophy, 25 August, Aluva, Kerala.
29.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2011). Freedom development and democracy: A journey with Amartya Sen. In AlexanderP.J. (Ed.), Heritage and development in the mission of the church. A Festschrift in honour of His Grace The Most Rev. Dr. Joseph Mar Thoma Metropolitan, The Mar Thoma Syrian Church of Malabar, pp. 477–94.
30.
PolanyiKarl (1944). The great transformation. Beacon: Boston.
31.
PrebischRaul (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. United Nations E/CN 12/89/Rev. 1, Economic Commission for Latin America, Department of Economic Affairs, United Nations, New York.
32.
RajK.N. (1956). Application of investment criteria in the choice between projects. Indian Economic Review, 3 (2) (August): 22–39.
33.
RayDebraj (2007). Development economics. In BlumeLawrenceDurlaufSteven (Eds), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Princeton University Press, New Jersy.Princeton University Press, New Jersey (downloaded from http://www.econ.nyu.edu/user/debraj/Papers/RayPalgrave.pdf) pp. 1–31.
RobbinsLionel (1932). Essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd.
36.
ShaullRichard (1973). Foreword. In Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press, pp. 1–31.
37.
SchumpeterJoseph A. (1954). History of economic analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.
38.
SenAmartya. (1960). Choice of techniques: An aspect of the theory of planned development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
39.
SenAmartya. (1970). Introduction. In SenA. (Ed.), Growth economics. London: Penguin, pp. 1–12.
40.
SenAmartya. (1984). Resources, values and development. Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
SenAmartya. (1992), Inequality Reexamined. Oxford University Press.
42.
SenAmartya. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
SenAmartya. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny. ADB Social Development Paper No. 1, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines.
44.
SenAmartya. (2005). The argumentative Indian. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
45.
ShahGhanshyamManderHarshThoratSukhadeoDeshpandeSatishBaviskarAmita (2006). Untouchability in rural India. New Delhi: SAGE.
46.
SolowRobert (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1): 65–94.
The Hindu (2012), Expert group to revisit poverty estimate criteria: Minister.
49.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (1999). Human development report. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
US Census Bureau (2011). The research supplemental poverty measure: 2010, Current Population Reports, US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration and US Census Bureau, issued November2011.
51.
VeltmeyerHenry (Ed.). (2011). The critical development studies handbook. Pluto Press.
52.
VernonRaymond (1977). Storm over the multinationals: The real issues. London: Macmillan.
53.
WilkinsonRichardPickettKate (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin.
54.
World Bank (1991). World development report, 1991, The Challenge of Development, Oxford.
55.
World Bank (2011). World development report 2011: Conflict, Security and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
